https://twitter.com/ADiMa...aJkLRbEF2y03ZyOt-Tpg&s=19

It looks like I was wrong believing Hayes to CLB was dead. Apparently, still hope.

https://twitter.com/ADiMarco25/status/1666832932613267456?t=41aJkLRbEF2y03ZyOt-Tpg&s=19

It looks like I was wrong believing Hayes to CLB was dead. Apparently, still hope.
- Trox88

Maybe they'll take Ristolainen also.

Should be listening on both him and Hart, they are the biggest assets right now. Given how streaky he is, I don't know if TK will match the year he had this year so time to sell high!
- TobyFlenderson

If the ask for #2 is Tk, Hart and #7 do you do it?

Sanheim had a poor season last year but he is a much higher value that Ristolainen. Ristolainen's physical element is not a positive. He is not good in coverage in his own zone and for a guy who is supposed to be this physical monster. He is frequently beaten in space around the net. If he can provide some offense, that's probably the only way he can add some value. Sanheim, if he plays as capable, adds puck movement and offense to the team along with reliable defense.
- MJL

It’s probably big bad Tort’s fault for benching him in Calgary, right? 😭

The value that a player adds to the ice isn't a factor in who would be easier to trade?
- MJL

lol. didn't say that. it is a factor but there are many other factors as well. one of the bigger ones are the IF's, cap and term. As I previously stated. Sanhiem had a down year. Risto is a known player. But with the term and over 6 mil, would be easier to move risto imo.

lol. didn't say that. it is a factor but there are many other factors as well. one of the bigger ones are the IF's, cap and term. As I previously stated. Sanhiem had a down year. Risto is a known player. But with the term and over 6 mil, would be easier to move risto imo.
- Peter Richards

What was the reason for your comment then if what I posted is indeed a factor in who is easier to move? Somehow you got confused and didn't understand that a player's value is a major factor in a trade potential. What's a known player? LOL. What is known about Ristolainen is that he is overpaid and isn't a very good player. I doubt there would be much interest around the league for Ristolainen at 5.1M a year. The Flyers would likely have to either retain salary or take back a bad contract or add a sweetener to move him. Sanheim if he reverts back to form, would be more moveable. Although the term might limit some teams. Sanheim is the kind of defenseman teams want. Ristolainen is not.

What was the reason for your comment then if what I posted is indeed a factor in who is easier to move? Somehow you got confused and didn't understand that a player's value is a major factor in a trade potential. What's a known player? LOL. What is known about Ristolainen is that he is overpaid and isn't a very good player. I doubt there would be much interest around the league for Ristolainen at 5.1M a year. The Flyers would likely have to either retain salary or take back a bad contract or add a sweetener to move him. Sanheim if he reverts back to form, would be more moveable. Although the term might limit some teams. Sanheim is the kind of defenseman teams want. Ristolainen is not.
- MJL

it was already explained.

it was already explained.
- Peter Richards

- MJL

keep trolling

keep trolling
- Peter Richards

Responding that I think your comment was humorous, is not trolling.