caufield out for season when are we going to sit konecny for the rest of the season to match their tank
- 2Real

😆 with flyers luck Brown will be out for the season.

Slafkovsky is/was out for 3 months too , dont know the the start date of his injury...and another player Kuhle ? I wonder what the Habs fans are thinking?
- RajaAmpat

Smart moves is what they are thinking

It was the 11th pick that they traded to Arizona. If the Flyers had kept that 11th pick, then they would not have had the 14th pick. It's impossible to pass on a player twice if you only make one selection in that draft before Caufield was selected. The Flyers only had an opportunity to select one player. Now if they had drafted two players before Caufield was selected. Then you could say they passed on him twice. The Flyers passed on him once, not twice. It does remain to be seen if York has more to offer than that. Hence the question. If York turns out to be a really good NHL defenseman, would that still be a major blunder?
- MJL

Matter of semantics as far as whether they passed on him twice. I say yeah and you say nah. As of this writing it remains a major blunder. No one knows what the future holds, but unless York becomes a true top notch defender it will always be a major blunder in my eyes. Again, no one knows how things play out. I think Caufield becomes a perennial 50 goal guy if he can stay healthy, so York better become much more than a steady defender.

Matter of semantics as far as whether they passed on him twice. I say yeah and you say nah. As of this writing it remains a major blunder. No one knows what the future holds, but unless York becomes a true top notch defender it will always be a major blunder in my eyes. Again, no one knows how things play out. I think Caufield becomes a perennial 50 goal guy if he can stay healthy, so York better become much more than a steady defender.
- Phillywhiteout

It's not semantics. You can't pass on a player if you don't have a pick. One pick= one player. It's not a major blunder. It's unknown as of this writing.

How many perennial 50 goal players are there in the NHL? Go back 10 years and see how many players that can be called a perennial 50 goal scorer. There's one, Alex Ovechkin. There's a few more players with the talent in MatthewsMc David, Draisaitl and Pasternak. Speaking of premature. It's incredibly premature to label Caulfield a perennial 50 goal scorer.

It's not semantics. You can't pass on a player if you don't have a pick. One pick= one player. It's not a major blunder. It's unknown as of this writing.

How many perennial 50 goal players are there in the NHL? Go back 10 years and see how many players that can be called a perennial 50 goal scorer. There's one, Alex Ovechkin. There's a few more players with the talent in MatthewsMc David, Draisaitl and Pasternak. Speaking of premature. It's incredibly premature to label Caulfield a perennial 50 goal scorer.
- MJL

Then why did you ask me the question? Kind of cracks me up that you ask me my opinion and then you tell me I'm wrong. If you already have all the answers why did you bother asking? I did NOT label Caufield a perennial 50 goal scorer. I said I think he will become one which indicates that I think he has the potential to become one. Let's just say I feel that Caufield will have a bigger impact on his team than York will have on the Flyers.

It's not semantics. You can't pass on a player if you don't have a pick. One pick= one player. It's not a major blunder. It's unknown as of this writing.

How many perennial 50 goal players are there in the NHL? Go back 10 years and see how many players that can be called a perennial 50 goal scorer. There's one, Alex Ovechkin. There's a few more players with the talent in MatthewsMc David, Draisaitl and Pasternak. Speaking of premature. It's incredibly premature to label Caulfield a perennial 50 goal scorer.
- MJL

Lol guy has never scored 30 goals but let’s label him a perennial 50 goal guy. Makes sense

Then why did you ask me the question? Kind of cracks me up that you ask me my opinion and then you tell me I'm wrong. If you already have all the answers why did you bother asking? I did NOT label Caufield a perennial 50 goal scorer. I said I think he will become one which indicates that I think he has the potential to become one. Let's just say I feel that Caufield will have a bigger impact on his team than York will have on the Flyers.
- Phillywhiteout

Can we hit 30 goals first? A guy that small, needs to prove he can play a full season in this league. Talented player, has to stay on the ice

Can we hit 30 goals first? A guy that small, needs to prove he can play a full season in this league. Talented player, has to stay on the ice
- ClaudeFather

Dude, are you serial?? He had 26 goals halfway through the season. Perhaps math isn't your strong suit, but try to think a bit before you go on some agenda filled tangent.

Lol guy has never scored 30 goals but let’s label him a perennial 50 goal guy. Makes sense
- ClaudeFather

I guess the word potential isn't in your vocabulary either? I did NOT label him anything. I said IMO he will become a perennial 50 goal scorer in the league. If you find a reason that he will not become that then by all means take your best shot.

Dude, are you serial?? He had 26 goals halfway through the season. Perhaps math isn't your strong suit, but try to think a bit before you go on some agenda filled tangent.
- Phillywhiteout

Dude, has he ever hit 30 goals? He’s 5’7, his health will be a huge question mark until proven otherwise, what’s so hard to comprehend?

I guess the word potential isn't in your vocabulary either? I did NOT label him anything. I said IMO he will become a perennial 50 goal scorer in the league. If you find a reason that he will not become that then by all means take your best shot.
- Phillywhiteout

Well he’s never touched 30 😂 so there’s that

Dude, has he ever hit 30 goals? He’s 5’7, his health will be a huge question mark until proven otherwise, what’s so hard to comprehend?
- ClaudeFather

Oh, I understand it perfectly. Cause he has now had one shoulder injury he is now labeled by you as injury prone. He played in the playoffs a couple years back and excelled. Don't think his physicality was an issue at all. Yes, perhaps he will have to bulk up some a la Jack Hughes, but smaller guys can play in today's NHL without all the clutching and grabbing.

Then why did you ask me the question? Kind of cracks me up that you ask me my opinion and then you tell me I'm wrong. If you already have all the answers why did you bother asking? I did NOT label Caufield a perennial 50 goal scorer. I said I think he will become one which indicates that I think he has the potential to become one. Let's just say I feel that Caufield will have a bigger impact on his team than York will have on the Flyers.
- Phillywhiteout

I asked you the question to lead the conversation towards the facts. To prove that calling passing on Caulfield for York is not anywhere near at this point something that can be called a major blunder. I then provided you the reality of what it takes to be a perennial 50 goal scorer and how often that happens in this league.

Again, your last statement is unknown.

I guess the word potential isn't in your vocabulary either? I did NOT label him anything. I said IMO he will become a perennial 50 goal scorer in the league. If you find a reason that he will not become that then by all means take your best shot.
- Phillywhiteout

The reason has already been given to you.

Dude, are you serial?? He had 26 goals halfway through the season. Perhaps math isn't your strong suit, but try to think a bit before you go on some agenda filled tangent.
- Phillywhiteout

Konency has 24 goals right now as age 25. Does this mean Konency is gonna score 50? I mean, he is still playing…