Wanna blog? Start your own hockey blog with My HockeyBuzz. Register for free today!
 

Analyzing Matt Martin's reported four-year extension

January 7, 2021, 6:49 PM ET [44 Comments]
Ben Shelley
New York Islanders Blogger • RSSArchiveCONTACT
Follow me on Twitter: @BenShelley_20
Follow HockeyBuzz Islanders on Twitter: @HB_Islanders


It was confirmed by Lou Lamoriello last week that the New York Islanders re-signed forward Matt Martin, though the details were left unknown.

It appears we now have those details and according to The Athletic’s Arthur Staple, Martin’s deal is four years long and carries an AAV of around $1.5 million.


While it’s fair for a general manager and organization to have loyalty to a player, this is not a good contract for the Islanders. Sure, you could argue $1.5 million really isn’t all that much money against an $81.5 million cap. But if the plan was to re-sign Martin all along, that Ross Johnston extension doesn't make much sense. The Islanders are continuing to throw money into the bottom of their lineup, without addressing greater needs first.

Plus, we can bet the extra money that was tacked onto Martin’s contract could have been used to extend Mathew Barzal and resolve the contract situation. Or if the Islanders think they’ll have a deal for Barzal in place for the start of the season, why wouldn’t they capitalize on the market to sign a forward who can help out their top-nine?

The term is another thing. In this market, even productive players who are still relatively young are getting one-year deals at a low price. It’s highly unlikely any other team was willing to give out that much money and term to sign Martin, so to give him another four-year deal right now is unnecessary.

The strangest part about this is that it’s been reported that the Islanders are actively trying to clear cap space and move Thomas Hickey or Leo Komarov, with an asset attached. Say they clear that space by giving up an asset to get rid of Hickey’s contract - more than half that money is now being allocated to a 31-year-old fourth-line forward, when the Islanders already have another younger fourth-line forward signed for above market value on a multi-year deal.

If the Islanders were intent on bringing Martin back, it should have been done on a cheaper, shorter contract, especially given the market right now.



***NOTE: We've launched a HockeyBuzz Islanders Twitter account! For anyone interested, you can follow @HB_Islanders for updates on articles, Islanders news, etc.***

Here’s today’s poll question (results and discussions will be posted in a future article):

Do you think this is a good contract for the Islanders?
Yes
No



OTHER ISLANDERS ARTICLES FROM JANUARY:

Islanders won't invite Josh Ho-Sang to training camp
Predicting the Islanders' taxi squad
Weekly Recap: Islanders Edition (January 3)
East Division Comparison: Islanders/Rangers
East Division Comparison: Islanders/Flyers
Matias Rajanimi earns Bronze Medal with Finland at World Juniors
Join the Discussion: » 44 Comments » Post New Comment
More from Ben Shelley
» Islanders sign Ken Appleby
» Analyzing the Islanders' trade for Kyle Palmieri and Travis Zajac
» Islanders acquire Kyle Palmieri and Travis Zajac from Devils
» Weekly Recap: Islanders Edition (April 5)
» Would claiming Nikita Gusev off waivers make sense for the Islanders?