In case you haven't noticed, Chicago has never been shy about long-term contracts...it's the AAV they need to consider, which as I said is even.
- Hawks18
That's wrong, they have to consider both.
It's not a foolish statement...that is actual fact. If you don't have the absolute best of something, there is room for improvement. Pretty basic and simple stuff...not my fault you can't comprehend logic.
As per your inference of "so according to your last statement, every team but one in the NHL needs to upgrade their goaltending" that is absolutely not what I said, which is precisely putting words into my mouth.
So, you've yet to use my actual words to discredit anything...all you've done is used your own subjective opinion to assume Chicago values what you deem to be worthwhile.
Shall we keep going? I can talk in circles like this with you forever...
- Hawks18
In the context of how you used it, it was very foolish. The context that you stated it in was in regards to a team's need. If you don't have the best goaltender in the league then you have a goaltending need, is pretty much what you said. It was a weak attempt to create a false need for the team when the need is not there. Chicago has a very good goaltender whether you like the player or not. No reasonable analysis of Chicago's team would point to goaltending as being an area of weakness that needs to be upgrade.
