|
|
Hemsky ISN'T worth a D prospect from Pittsburgh. Stop with the utter non sense. It gets old. Pittsburgh has no interest in Hemsky and his 5 million cap hit for next year and his inability to stay healthy. |
|
Axeman33
Edmonton Oilers |
|
|
Location: Windsor, NS Joined: 08.18.2011
|
|
|
Tamby has been asleep at the wheel for some time now. I dont expect a trade deadline to wake him up. I dont see the Oilers doing much at the trade deadline. Whitney will probably be the only one on the move and even with his recent resurgence, I wouldnt expect much of a return. You wont get much for a guy heading into UFA. |
|
systemtool
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: Real men always have to poo, ON Joined: 09.12.2007
|
|
|
systemtool
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: Real men always have to poo, ON Joined: 09.12.2007
|
|
|
Hemsky ISN'T worth a D prospect from Pittsburgh. Stop with the utter non sense. It gets old. Pittsburgh has no interest in Hemsky and his 5 million cap hit for next year and his inability to stay healthy. - Oneonta Penguin
Yea, Im going to have to agree with this. Edmonton fans and media have to get over the notion that anyone outside of that bubble has any interest or desire of adding Hemsky to their team.
Edmonton should go after the same guy I want my own team to go after. David Clarkson. |
|
OilHorse
Edmonton Oilers |
|
|
Location: EKolb..ChiRef..Dnozzlesupreme, BC Joined: 10.12.2010
|
|
|
Jesus. Who are you EK?
Smid's agent and the team not talking, and you take that as issues? That happens a fair amount you know.
Again with the Horc buy out, but now you have qualifiers to let you back out. It isn't his play that would require him to be bought out. There is no substantial attitude issue. He is not a financial logjam next year. There is nothing to substantiate your insistence that he will be bought out, other than your "sources". |
|
|
|
At the trade deadline, Khabibulin will be dealt to St. Louis for a 3rd rounder. L5 - laughs2907
Yup prob will |
|
|
|
Hemsky ISN'T worth a D prospect from Pittsburgh. Stop with the utter non sense. It gets old. Pittsburgh has no interest in Hemsky and his 5 million cap hit for next year and his inability to stay healthy. - Oneonta Penguin
Im gonna quote you on that and when he ends up on crosbys wing you will laugh at this. As far as not being worth a defensive prospect your right. Hes worth 2 |
|
Ur Not Me
New York Islanders |
|
Location: Long Island, NY Joined: 11.30.2008
|
|
|
OilHorse
Edmonton Oilers |
|
|
Location: EKolb..ChiRef..Dnozzlesupreme, BC Joined: 10.12.2010
|
|
|
Hemsky ISN'T worth a D prospect from Pittsburgh. Stop with the utter non sense. It gets old. Pittsburgh has no interest in Hemsky and his 5 million cap hit for next year and his inability to stay healthy. - Oneonta Penguin
You do know that he has been healthy for the past 2 years right?
To clarify before you go look at his games played last year, he was slow to get in last year, then when he did he did not miss any consecutive time with a major issue, and the only game he missed this year was after he took a shot off the foot missing one game.
Your "injury" troll attempts have run the course. |
|
|
|
Sens won't get a 1st for a goalie who has only played 8 games and has a 4-4 record. Keep him, no one cares. - Arctic_AARDVARK
They've been going about getting a 1st for him all year.
|
|
deks1
Edmonton Oilers |
|
|
Joined: 02.13.2012
|
|
|
Bishop for a 2nd and 4th? This is insulting...no deal. You say that you will give us a 2nd and laugh in our face when we meet in the finals in 2016 and you ride on Bishop? He's #1 goalie buddy...we know it and when you have him on your team, you will know it.
I don't want to trade him, but we have no choice...unless Anderson goes but then, I don't want that either. I don't want any of my goalies to go
Murray should ask a 1st for Bishop and not trade if no one is offering...reason why Bishop is not playing alot is because of is contract. We're limitating is ice time for a reason.
I would take Bishop and 6th for Pajaarvi...that is how I see Bishop. No deal? Go for M. Smith
- SENSpatriot
no deal |
|
|
|
Bishop for a 2nd and 4th? This is insulting...no deal. You say that you will give us a 2nd and laugh in our face when we meet in the finals in 2016 and you ride on Bishop? He's #1 goalie buddy...we know it and when you have him on your team, you will know it.
I don't want to trade him, but we have no choice...unless Anderson goes but then, I don't want that either. I don't want any of my goalies to go
Murray should ask a 1st for Bishop and not trade if no one is offering...reason why Bishop is not playing alot is because of is contract. We're limitating is ice time for a reason.
I would take Bishop and 6th for Pajaarvi...that is how I see Bishop. No deal? Go for M. Smith
- SENSpatriot
I was with you right up until you offered Bishop+ for Pajaarvi...wow man.
You might as well take the 2nd and 4th. |
|
|
|
I agree about Montreal playing over their heads. The question younshould ask yourself Richard, is why can't the Oilers with their talent ever play over the heads. Answer is coaching and character players. You have the tools to get some, but Tambelini is afraid to trade a young asset. |
|
p_zub
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: Toronto, ON Joined: 02.20.2007
|
|
|
They've been going about getting a 1st for him all year. - robin_steele264
Apparently Lehner is the best young goalie since Carey Price? |
|
doon
Edmonton Oilers |
|
|
Location: Spruce Grove, AB Joined: 08.27.2008
|
|
|
I agree about Montreal playing over their heads. The question younshould ask yourself Richard, is why can't the Oilers with their talent ever play over the heads. Answer is coaching and character players. You have the tools to get some, but Tambelini is afraid to trade a young asset. - Champ
I think its more of other GMs are afraid to deal with the Great Tambelini. |
|
systemtool
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: Real men always have to poo, ON Joined: 09.12.2007
|
|
|
Im gonna quote you on that and when he ends up on crosbys wing you will laugh at this. As far as not being worth a defensive prospect your right. Hes worth 2 - Joshc
Im already laughing at the notion he bumps Kunitz and Neal from that line. |
|
Lahey
Edmonton Oilers |
|
|
Location: del's basement chilling with S, AB Joined: 03.07.2011
|
|
|
Gregor was saying Stafford wouldn't be against a trade.
Be an interesting pickup if say Hemsky going the other way. Stafford plays both wings has size, plays two-way hockey and has a contract that would fit here. |
|
|
|
I think its more of other GMs are afraid to deal with the Great Tambelini. - doon
I guess you're right. |
|
|
|
I'm not sure how the Habs are as good of a team as they are with the roster they have. I know I'm not alone in thinking this.
You are not alone! Habs have tendency to overachieve everyone couple of seasons. |
|
|
|
You are not alone! Habs have tendency to overachieve everyone couple of seasons. - Captain_Quiffe
Yes. It has something to do with that crest. |
|
Rang
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
Joined: 08.21.2006
|
|
|
Trade RNH to the Leafs for Gardiner and both teams get a problem solved.
Do it, you know you want to. |
|
deks1
Edmonton Oilers |
|
|
Joined: 02.13.2012
|
|
|
Gregor was saying Stafford wouldn't be against a trade.
Be an interesting pickup if say Hemsky going the other way. Stafford plays both wings has size, plays two-way hockey and has a contract that would fit here. - Lahey
yup, saw that yesterday. i think it's a fair trade too.
Trade RNH to the Leafs for Gardiner and both teams get a problem solved.
Do it, you know you want to. - Rang
no |
|
|
|
What do y'all want for Willie Mitchell ?? - Deadmau55
young legs |
|
CFCV.
Edmonton Oilers |
|
Location: Edmonton, AB Joined: 01.19.2013
|
|
|
Trade RNH to the Leafs for Gardiner and both teams get a problem solved.
Do it, you know you want to. - Rang
|
|
|
|
Trade RNH to the Leafs for Gardiner and both teams get a problem solved.
Do it, you know you want to. - Rang
Problem with that is RNH can fetch better than Gardiner. |
|