|
|
Bruins Could Get BAck in on OEL (e3)
We all know the OEL team said a deal needed to get done by UFA day and that deadline has come and gone. The Bruins still sit there with the cap space to make it happen however, and these sort of negotiations can always be reborn. The Reality is the Coyotes are sitting there with the need to clear a ton of cap space per their owner's mandate.
Eklund |
|
|
|
Personally, I do not see it happening. |
|
|
|
[quote=HockeyBuzz]Bruins Could Get BAck in on OEL (e3)
PASS.sign your own and think of the three defence to protect next year |
|
jryan88
|
|
Location: PA Joined: 09.02.2020
|
|
|
A package would have to start with Debrusk and Studnicka but I think the Yotes were more interested in the Canucks prospect pool |
|
|
|
You could at least base your rumors off of facts. There was never a mandate to shed cap space. |
|
|
|
Only e3? Nothing to see here. |
|
xShoot4WarAmpsx
Philadelphia Flyers |
|
|
Location: Hamilton, ON Joined: 06.25.2010
|
|
|
The whole point of a deadline is to to complete something before a given day. That deadline has passed. OEL is not going anywhere. Boston IS NOT in on OEL |
|
|
|
You could at least base your rumors off of facts. There was never a mandate to shed cap space. - jmichael7753 Thanks for pretending to have inside information. That is always fun to watch.
|
|
|
|
The whole point of a deadline is to to complete something before a given day. That deadline has passed. OEL is not going anywhere. Boston IS NOT in on OEL - xShoot4WarAmpsx . Maybe you are new to this stuff but teams and players do this deadline bit all the time and deals often get done after the expire.
|
|
Tachmo
Boston Bruins |
|
Location: Canada, SK Joined: 07.01.2008
|
|
|
A package would have to start with Debrusk and Studnicka but I think the Yotes were more interested in the Canucks prospect pool - jryan88
Would have to start with Studnicka and Debrusk? Umm no thanks.
I don’t think Arizona is in any position to start demanding a package like that. They are desperate to dump salary and I can’t seeing them getting a very good return. Pretty hard for a team willing to absorb that contract he has and the term.
Studnicka and Moore for OEL.
Take it or leave it. |
|
bluemoon737
Boston Bruins |
|
|
Location: Portsmouth, NH Joined: 04.19.2019
|
|
|
Would have to start with Studnicka and Debrusk? Umm no thanks.
I don’t think Arizona is in any position to start demanding a package like that. They are desperate to dump salary and I can’t seeing them getting a very good return. Pretty hard for a team willing to absorb that contract he has and the term.
Studnicka and Moore for OEL.
Take it or leave it. - Tachmo
I don't like either of those players in the deal. Need Moore around for the expansion draft. Stud is important to long term plans. How about the Ritchie brothers and either Vaak or Lauzon (and Arizona keeps $1.25M). Heck, throw in a 2021 3rd. |
|
mikeq672
Boston Bruins |
|
|
Location: Auburn, MA Joined: 06.29.2013
|
|
|
I don't like either of those players in the deal. Need Moore around for the expansion draft. Stud is important to long term plans. How about the Ritchie brothers and either Vaak or Lauzon (and Arizona keeps $1.25M). Heck, throw in a 2021 3rd. - bluemoon737
What purpose does Moore serve for the expansion draft? Also we only have one Ritchie brother under contract and that trade offer is terribly, laughably bad. Hey heres all our junk we dont want, gimme your franchise player, thanks. |
|
bluemoon737
Boston Bruins |
|
|
Location: Portsmouth, NH Joined: 04.19.2019
|
|
|
What purpose does Moore serve for the expansion draft? Also we only have one Ritchie brother under contract and that trade offer is terribly, laughably bad. Hey heres all our junk we dont want, gimme your franchise player, thanks. - mikeq672
Moore fits the bill as meeting all the wickets to be picked. You have to expose players and those players have to meet certain criteria and Moore fits the bill. You are correct on Brett Ritchie, thought we had him for another year. Hey Arizona is the one trying to shed salary, no reason to give them anything more than necessary. Vaak or Lauzon are good quality prospects, add in a 3rd (I'd go a 2nd) and toss in a low cost bottom 6 guy. |
|