Wanna blog? Start your own hockey blog with My HockeyBuzz. Register for free today!
 
Forums :: Blog World :: Peter Tessier: Make it Whole or Make it Fehr?
Author Message
Peter Tessier
Joined: 10.11.2011

Nov 3 @ 11:40 AM ET
Peter Tessier: Make it Whole or Make it Fehr? A look at how the NHL and it's 'make it whole' proposal could work.
spatso
Ottawa Senators
Location: jensen beach, FL
Joined: 02.19.2007

Nov 3 @ 11:59 AM ET
If you remember when Bettman first proposed 50/50 he also said he was open to discuss other means of making existing contracts whole. People make too much of the need for talks. Both sides know exactly what are the options. I think the NHLPA was in a much better position to do a deal when Bettman made the initial 50/50 offer. Looks bad to take the deal now.
captainserious
Chicago Blackhawks
Joined: 02.24.2010

Nov 3 @ 12:13 PM ET
I still don't get how any of this would work...if they reduce the salary cap,how will a lot of teams in the NHL get under the cap? Would existing contracts be reduced? Anyone have the time to explain?
Peter Tessier
Joined: 10.11.2011

Nov 3 @ 1:02 PM ET
I still don't get how any of this would work...if they reduce the salary cap,how will a lot of teams in the NHL get under the cap? Would existing contracts be reduced? Anyone have the time to explain?
- captainserious


The first year is tricky and should it go ahead I'm curious to see how a cap and HRr split happens. I've got some ideas but not so much time today.
saul91
Ottawa Senators
Location: Niagara Falls, ON
Joined: 11.02.2012

Nov 3 @ 1:12 PM ET
Pete, I think you are forgetting that the cap ceiling is actually higher than just 1/30th of 57% (or 50%) of HRR. The ceiling is actually a percentage above that, and the floor is a percentage below that.

As it stands right now, if the players' share of HRR dropped down to 50% from 57%, the cap ceiling would become about $61.58 million instead of the currently-projected $70.2 million. I can only speculate as to what the floor would be, as I have heard rumours that owners actually want the floor to be closer to the cap midpoint, but if it were under the same rules as present, it would be $16 million below the cap, or $46.58 million.
Peter Tessier
Joined: 10.11.2011

Nov 3 @ 3:31 PM ET
Pete, I think you are forgetting that the cap ceiling is actually higher than just 1/30th of 57% (or 50%) of HRR. The ceiling is actually a percentage above that, and the floor is a percentage below that.

As it stands right now, if the players' share of HRR dropped down to 50% from 57%, the cap ceiling would become about $61.58 million instead of the currently-projected $70.2 million. I can only speculate as to what the floor would be, as I have heard rumours that owners actually want the floor to be closer to the cap midpoint, but if it were under the same rules as present, it would be $16 million below the cap, or $46.58 million.

- saul91


Good point and I'm using basic math to discuss the idea. The spread of the cap has always been problematic because players have voted again and again to use their 5% increase right- their way of more money spent.

If players are guaranteed a floor of HHR at 50% of 3.3 billion it's their best interest for league to grow revenue. Right now it's in their interest but not nearly to the same extent.

The salary cap right now is a spending limit not a pay out limit. Link the cap to a guaranteed floor of 1.65 bill and then let split revenue over it go back to players as profit sharing. The hard cap means deals going forward are just going to be A LOT less.