Eklund
Commissioner |
|
 |
Joined: 09.15.2005
|
|
|
Nucker101
Vancouver Canucks |
|
 |
Location: Vancouver, BC Joined: 09.26.2010
|
|
|
Markstrom |
|
Garth_Mctavish
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
Location: Edmonton, AB Joined: 12.10.2014
|
|
|
4ofaKind
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Location: Campbell River Joined: 11.30.2013
|
|
|
Markstrom  - Nucker101
Unless miller is out for6 weeks I doubt a call up.
He would have be sent down when miller comes off IR. He'd be claimed |
|
Nucker101
Vancouver Canucks |
|
 |
Location: Vancouver, BC Joined: 09.26.2010
|
|
|
Unless miller is out for6 weeks I doubt a call up.
He would have be sent down when miller comes off IR. He'd be claimed - 4ofaKind
They can call him up under "emergency" circumstances and he can be sent back down without having to be waived as long as he's not dressed for 10+ games. |
|
4ofaKind
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Location: Campbell River Joined: 11.30.2013
|
|
|
They can call him up under "emergency" circumstances and he can be sent back down without having to be waived as long as he's not dressed for 10+ games. - Nucker101
I'd be surprised if a regular injury is "emergency circumstances "
I thought that was for junior aged players after being sent down? |
|
Nucker101
Vancouver Canucks |
|
 |
Location: Vancouver, BC Joined: 09.26.2010
|
|
|
I'd be surprised if a regular injury is "emergency circumstances "
I thought that was for junior aged players after being sent? - 4ofaKind
I'm pretty sure teams can call up AHL guys under "emergency circumstances" if an injury occurs and they don't have enough players at that position to cover for the injury. |
|
|
|
So does this mean Boston doesn't want to trade us Malcom Subban for Jeff Petry? |
|
Beatle_john
Vancouver Canucks |
|
 |
Location: Corner of Kirk Maclean's Toe and Robert Reichel's face. Joined: 01.09.2006
|
|
|
I that Markstrom was the Golden Child of the AHL. The 'next one'. I think he would be mighty pissed if the Canucks picked up a backup.... maybe he would be slated for the AHL as a replacement/insurance. |
|
Kopitar1
Los Angeles Kings |
|
Location: west covina, CA Joined: 06.30.2008
|
|
|
Unless miller is out for6 weeks I doubt a call up.
He would have be sent down when miller comes off IR. He'd be claimed - 4ofaKind
on nhl network tonight say looks like they will call him up |
|
Vanoxy
Vegas Golden Knights |
|
 |
Location: Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov!!!! Joined: 06.26.2014
|
|
|
I'd be surprised if a regular injury is "emergency circumstances "
I thought that was for junior aged players after being sent down? - 4ofaKind
From The current CBA...
"The NHL permits each team to carry up to 23 players on its active roster, subject to the constraints of the salary cap. However, it also requires a minimum of 2 goaltenders, 6 defenceman and 12 forwards on its active roster at all times. A player is not considered on the active roster if they have been placed on the Injured Reserve List or are suspended by the NHL.
If the team falls below any of these minimum categories, they are permitted to recall a player without subjection to waivers in order to meet the NHL minimum roster requirements. However, the player must be returned to the affiliate when the player he is replacing returns from their inactive status."
To me, this indicates we get to showcase him, risk free, for as long as Miller is placed on the Injured List.
Consider it our silver lining to the Injury black cloud.
This could honestly be the best case scenario. Markstrom could look great in 1or 2 NHL starts, then return to Utica and take them deep in the AHL playoffs. Miller can rehab and rest, before coming back hungry just before the playoff. Lack could show that he can carry the day to day workload.
They seem committed to stocking up Utica for a big run, so if Miller is done for the season, maybe they would look at adding Neuvirth.
But all season we've been wondering which of our 3 goalies would get traded. If theres any chance Miller might return I can 't see them adding another G. |
|
sniper11
Anaheim Ducks |
|
Location: CA Joined: 06.12.2014
|
|
|
Go ahead... put in a waiver claim on Bryz. I dare ya |
|
oiljapan
Edmonton Oilers |
|
Location: Tokyo Joined: 10.22.2014
|
|
|
This is exciting - Garth_Mctavish
This is VERY exciting. |
|
phyllee
Vancouver Canucks |
|
 |
Joined: 06.24.2014
|
|
|
Markstrom  - Nucker101
Cant wait for him and Lack to challenge each other in the crease, no need to trade for another goalie |
|
Aussiepenguin
Pittsburgh Penguins |
|
Location: Sydney Joined: 08.02.2014
|
|
|
Does this mean the Yandle talks will be held in the offseason?
I'd love to find out what the Yotes are actually trying to do, dump & build or patch & punch. Surely Vermette would be a player that could help the patch & punch on scenario? |
|
Bieksa#3
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Joined: 07.21.2009
|
|
|
I'd be surprised if a regular injury is "emergency circumstances "
I thought that was for junior aged players after being sent down? - 4ofaKind
There's no re entry waivers in the new cba |
|
leonwaldo420
Buffalo Sabres |
|
 |
Location: Never In Canada Joined: 06.30.2008
|
|
|
Cptmjl
New York Islanders |
|
 |
Joined: 11.05.2011
|
|
|
Streit2ThePoint
Seattle Kraken |
|
 |
Location: it's disgusting how good you are at hockeybuzz. Joined: 09.20.2013
|
|
|
Steven_Dean
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
Location: KL Joined: 07.10.2012
|
|
|
From The current CBA...
"The NHL permits each team to carry up to 23 players on its active roster, subject to the constraints of the salary cap. However, it also requires a minimum of 2 goaltenders, 6 defenceman and 12 forwards on its active roster at all times. A player is not considered on the active roster if they have been placed on the Injured Reserve List or are suspended by the NHL.
If the team falls below any of these minimum categories, they are permitted to recall a player without subjection to waivers in order to meet the NHL minimum roster requirements. However, the player must be returned to the affiliate when the player he is replacing returns from their inactive status."
To me, this indicates we get to showcase him, risk free, for as long as Miller is placed on the Injured List.
Consider it our silver lining to the Injury black cloud.
This could honestly be the best case scenario. Markstrom could look great in 1or 2 NHL starts, then return to Utica and take them deep in the AHL playoffs. Miller can rehab and rest, before coming back hungry just before the playoff. Lack could show that he can carry the day to day workload.
They seem committed to stocking up Utica for a big run, so if Miller is done for the season, maybe they would look at adding Neuvirth.
But all season we've been wondering which of our 3 goalies would get traded. If theres any chance Miller might return I can 't see them adding another G. - Vanoxy
The only downside is that Miller must go on IR. If he is only gone for a week or so then they have to either call up a goalie not subject to waivers or pick up a replacement. Bryzgalov will work out sitting on the bench for a week or two (so would Vancouver's AHL's no.2 I guess though.
|
|
bcallaway
St Louis Blues |
|
 |
Location: The Clown may be the source of mirth - but who shall make the clown laugh? Joined: 03.29.2006
|
|
|
dothedougie
Boston Bruins |
|
 |
Location: DISCLAIMER: HEAVY SARCASM FILTER, CO Joined: 10.24.2013
|
|
|
This is very exciting. - Streit2ThePoint
|
|
DDM-Coga
Colorado Avalanche |
|
 |
Location: If Chabot is not in the NHL, Ill revoke my account - AlfiesSald, AB Joined: 07.24.2009
|
|
|
They can call him up under "emergency" circumstances and he can be sent back down without having to be waived as long as he's not dressed for 10+ games. - Nucker101
Rules are for chumps, |
|
Streit2ThePoint
Seattle Kraken |
|
 |
Location: it's disgusting how good you are at hockeybuzz. Joined: 09.20.2013
|
|
|
Bryzgalov to Canucks
(e1) |
|
eichiefs9
New York Islanders |
|
 |
Location: NY Joined: 11.03.2008
|
|
|
Bryzgalov to Canucks
(e1) - Streit2ThePoint
|
|