Again, there is no disputing the number of US deaths in Afghanistan. Do a little research if you don't want to believe me.

http://philadelphia.cbslo...amas-afghan-surge-failed/

http://www.wired.com/dang...012/09/surge-report-card/

http://www.outsidethebelt...s-afghan-surge-a-failure/

http://www.theatlanticwir...-failure-one-chart/57351/

- Doppleganger

ya but hes in there because of Bush eh

so that means you stand behind posting something that stupid?
- kicksave856

explain what is stupid???

ya but hes in there because of Bush eh
- the_cause2000

watch the way you word it. he'll try to deflect the stupidity of his post by arguing your wording. because that takes away the stupidity of his post.

oh and because he's smarter than everyone else.

explain what is stupid???
- Doppleganger

Doppleganger

watch the way you word it. he'll try to deflect the stupidity of his post by arguing your wording. because that takes away the stupidity of his post.

oh and because he's smarter than everyone else.
- kicksave856

Here's the list of US deaths in Afghanistan.

http://icasualties.org/oef/



2001 - 12
2002 - 49
2003- 48
2004 - 52
2005 - 99
2006 - 98
2007 - 117
2008 - 155
2009 - 317
2010 - 499
2011- 418
2012 - 310
2013 - 2

watch the way you word it. he'll try to deflect the stupidity of his post by arguing your wording. because that takes away the stupidity of his post.

oh and because he's smarter than everyone else.
- kicksave856

essentially the same tactic used by velociraptors

Here's the list of US deaths in Afghanistan.

http://icasualties.org/oef/



2001 - 12
2002 - 49
2003- 48
2004 - 52
2005 - 99
2006 - 98
2007 - 117
2008 - 155
2009 - 317
2010 - 499
2011- 418
2012 - 310
2013 - 2
- Doppleganger

keep going. you look more intelligent every time.

watch the way you word it. he'll try to deflect the stupidity of his post by arguing your wording. because that takes away the stupidity of his post.

oh and because he's smarter than everyone else.
- kicksave856

I posted

What is so dumb about the truth.

The War in Afghanistan began on 7 October 2001, so under Bush's roughly 7.8 years, there were fewer US Casualties than under Obama's 4 years.
- Doppleganger

you responded

this is dumb and you know it. they were there because of bush.

keep up the act, man. this kind of thing makes the whole schtick less believable.
- kicksave856

Do you stand by your statement that "they were there because of Bush"??


Are you saying the ONLY reason the US lead coalition invaded Afghanistan was becasue of Bush??


BTW, what does "they were there because of Bush" mean anyways???

Did Bush just throw a dart on board, and decide to invade whichever country it hit?


Did you just forget about the thousands of deaths in the US on 9 11??

Here's the list of US deaths in Afghanistan.

http://icasualties.org/oef/



2001 - 12
2002 - 49
2003- 48
2004 - 52
2005 - 99
2006 - 98
2007 - 117
2008 - 155
2009 - 317
2010 - 499
2011- 418
2012 - 310
2013 - 2
- Doppleganger

i see you neglect to mention that obama also has the year with the LEAST amount of deaths.

ur move

i see you neglect to mention that obama also has the year with the LEAST amount of deaths.

ur move
- the_cause2000

Are you that ignorant?

NONE of Obama's "years" are less that Bush's

Which year are you referring to?

Are you that ignorant?

NONE of Obama's "years" are less that Bush's

Which year are you referring to?
- Doppleganger

2013

ur move geanyus

I posted






you responded






Do you stand by your statement that "they were there because of Bush"??


Are you saying the ONLY reason the US lead coalition invaded Afghanistan was becasue of Bush??


BTW, what does "they were there because of Bush" mean anyways???

Did Bush just throw a dart on board, and decide to invade whichever country it hit?


Did you just forget about the thousands of deaths in the US on 9 11??
- Doppleganger

maybe you have to hang on the way my post was worded, but your post was just stupid.

you understand that post, but you have to deflect.

the sad part is i cannot repeatedly ask you if you stand behind your baseless numbers post because you reposted it, pretty much saying that you do. (the sad part is that you stand behind such a stupid post)

2013

ur move geanyus
- the_cause2000

2013

ur move geanyus
- the_cause2000

22 days is NOT a year............it may be your IQ though.

this is why obama will win the next election easily

maybe you have to hang on the way my post was worded, but your post was just stupid.

you understand that post, but you have to deflect.

the sad part is i cannot repeatedly ask you if you stand behind your baseless numbers post because you reposted it, pretty much saying that you do. (the sad part is that you stand behind such a stupid post)
- kicksave856

They are not my "numbers" I posted the links to the sites where these number are listed, why not go see for yourself, and then apologize for being so ignorant.http://icasualties.org/oef/

this is why obama will win the next election easily
- the_cause2000

The next election is only the house and the senate.

They are not my "numbers" I posted the links to the sites where these number are listed, why not go see for yourself, and then apologize for being so ignorant.http://icasualties.org/oef/
- Doppleganger

the numbers are useless. your website is useless. you are useless.

apologize for being an bumhole.

They are not my "numbers" I posted the links to the sites where these number are listed, why not go see for yourself, and then apologize for being so ignorant.http://icasualties.org/oef/
- Doppleganger

ur basically arguing its not JFJs fault the Leafs stink


let me ask you this. WHO was president in 2003?

The next election is only the house and the senate.
- Doppleganger

not true at all

Again, there is no disputing the number of US deaths in Afghanistan. Do a little research if you don't want to believe me.

http://philadelphia.cbslo...amas-afghan-surge-failed/

http://www.wired.com/dang...012/09/surge-report-card/

http://www.outsidethebelt...s-afghan-surge-a-failure/

http://www.theatlanticwir...-failure-one-chart/57351/



http://icasualties.org/oef/



2001 - 12
2002 - 49
2003- 48
2004 - 52
2005 - 99
2006 - 98
2007 - 117
2008 - 155
2009 - 317
2010 - 499
2011- 418
2012 - 310
2013 - 2
- Doppleganger

Not that I give a poop because I have nothing but contempt for those who blindly and obediently divide themselves over outdated ideologies, but what is it that you feel Obama did to cause all those extra deaths to US military personnel? Numbers are there but surely you realize how nonsensical it is to place them all at his feet.

[quote=the_cause2000]ur basically arguing its not JFJs fault the Leafs stink


let me ask you this. WHO was president in 2003?

this is why obama Hilary Clinton will win the next election easily
- the_cause2000

Not that I give a poop because I have nothing but contempt for those who blindly and obediently divide themselves over outdated ideologies, but what is it that you feel Obama did to cause all those extra deaths to US military personnel? Numbers are there but surely you realize how nonsensical it is to place them all at his feet.
- sanfordnson

I can answer this one too!




He's a socialist!!!!

[quote=Pecafan Fan]dopple, let me answer this one!!!!













George Walker (W.) Bush (born July 6, 1946) is a