I don't need you to fill me in on things.
You can win if you don't score.
ask the devils, sabres, Bruins

I am well aware of what team D is. but this D is there to eliminate the extra pressure on suspect goaltending and unless you are going to spend money to upgrade the nets, you need to keep this "great" D around.
- nails

What did the Devils, Sabres, and Bruins win last year? If the Bruins could score, the Flyers wouldn't have gone to the finals.

If you well aware of what team D is, then why are so focused on the defenseman? This team is able to withstand the loss of a Dman far more easily than the loss of Carter.

Unless you've got something new here, I'm done discussing this with you.

you forgot that JVR needed to stay in the minors
- nails

you forgot that JVR needed to stay in the minors
- nails

yes I did -- mjl told us all that it was pre-determined that he would -- he also told us to watch for randy jones on the Flyers PP


I cant believe I overlooked those true statements

What did the Devils, Sabres, and Bruins win last year? If the Bruins could score, the Flyers wouldn't have gone to the finals.

If you well aware of what team D is, then why are so focused on the defenseman? This team is able to withstand the loss of a Dman far more easily than the loss of Carter.

Unless you've got something new here, I'm done discussing this with you.
- MJL

what did the Flyers win with carter? You were the one that stated that you cant win if you dont score -- dont try to turn the tables on Nails -- he is like way smart and stuff -- he is around college students all day

And your assuming that the team would be better if they move Carter. Which you don't know. And your assuming that they can withstand the loss of Carter, which you don't know. And your assuming that a player won't waive his clause. Which you don't know. I can go on if I need to.
- MJL

please, go on.

Yes, I assume that a TEAM can withstand the loss of one player. If they can't, then they aren't a good team.
I assume they won't waive because they don't have to.

You make it sound, every time, like I WANT to trade Carter. I don't want to trade Carter. I am merely offering an option that will maintain a strong team on the ice, keep the D that protects our sub par goaltender, and doesn't require the hypothetical waive of a movement clause.

The only thing you offer is the assumption that a guy who doesn't need to waive his clause will do so so that we can keep a guy who has scored 40 goals once.

What did the Devils, Sabres, and Bruins win last year? If the Bruins could score, the Flyers wouldn't have gone to the finals.

If you well aware of what team D is, then why are so focused on the defenseman? This team is able to withstand the loss of a Dman far more easily than the loss of Carter.

Unless you've got something new here, I'm done discussing this with you.
- MJL

typical

what did the Flyers win with carter? You were the one that stated that you cant win if you dont score -- dont try to turn the tables on Nails -- he is like way smart and stuff -- he is around college students all day
- lukin

most of them are half neked, so I don't think much

please, go on.

Yes, I assume that a TEAM can withstand the loss of one player. If they can't, then they aren't a good team.
I assume they won't waive because they don't have to.

You make it sound, every time, like I WANT to trade Carter. I don't want to trade Carter. I am merely offering an option that will maintain a strong team on the ice, keep the D that protects our sub par goaltender, and doesn't require the hypothetical waive of a movement clause.

The only thing you offer is the assumption that a guy who doesn't need to waive his clause will do so so that we can keep a guy who has scored 40 goals once.
- nails

LOL. No that's not the only thing I offer.

Every statement you've made on this subject is a hypothetical. And hypotheticals not based on sound logic.

And if a team can withstand the loss of one player, why can't that player be a defenseman. Like you said, if they can't then they aren't a good team. You contradict yourself.

Like I said, if you don't have anything new to offer, I'm done here.

most of them are half neked, so I don't think much
- nails

do they tell you to put away your little hammer?

typical
- nails

It certainly is! Right on target, as usual.

LOL. No that's not the only thing I offer.

Every statement you've made on this subject is a hypothetical. And hypotheticals not based on sound logic.

Like I said, if you don't have anything new to offer, I'm done here.
- MJL

and what isn't hypothetical about your statements?

It certainly is! Right on target, as usual.
- MJL

or quitting when someone won't kowtow to your opinion.

wow

and what isn't hypothetical about your statements?
- nails

havent you learned anythoing -- his statements are FACTS!!!!!

wow
- FlyerMike18

its been an active evening

wow
- FlyerMike18

can you please spell that backwards for me?

havent you learned anythoing -- his statements are FACTS!!!!!
- lukin

sorry, I thought maybe pointing it out was the appropriate way to go.

can you please spell that backwards for me?
- lukin

wow bob wow

sorry, I thought maybe pointing it out was the appropriate way to go.
- nails

just kowtow to him and you will be allright



dont PM me text me instead

wow bob wow
- FlyerMike18

you just lupuL my mind with that one

just kowtow to him and you will be allright



dont PM me text me instead
- lukin

T3 asleep in arms. not moving until she wakes up
phone in other room.

T3 asleep in arms. not moving until she wakes up
phone in other room.
- nails

which one is T3? And if it is your arms how can you type?

which one is T3? And if it is your arms how can you type?
- lukin

from the wrist down is all typing.
T3 is the new one. the cute one.

you just lupuL my mind with that one
- lukin

pretty wild

from the wrist down is all typing.
T3 is the new one. the cute one.
- nails

you do understand that this post I am quoting will be forwarded to Watson, and when the time is rite, will be sent to the "ugly" ones