Pat1993
Montreal Canadiens |
|
 |
Location: disguise delimit, QC Joined: 08.28.2009
|
|
|
So who DO you want as your #1? - braidan
someone else that isn't with the habs yet would be my guess |
|
braidan
Referee Montreal Canadiens |
|
 |
Location: State of Corruption. Joined: 09.27.2006
|
|
|
Not really, career journeyman, inconsistent and often frantic between the pipes isn’t who I’d want as my #1. Again, to each their own though. - Habsolute009
2 teams is a journey?? |
|
Habsolute009
Montreal Canadiens |
|
 |
Location: Toronto, ON Joined: 12.09.2010
|
|
|
well, that's my opinion about your reactions right now, that isn't really debatable 
but yes, about the goalies, to each their own, I agree. - Pat1993
I dont think you understand what debatable means if you are approaching that as fact. Keep trying Pat. |
|
braidan
Referee Montreal Canadiens |
|
 |
Location: State of Corruption. Joined: 09.27.2006
|
|
|
someone else that isn't with the habs yet would be my guess - Pat1993
Ill take Devon Levi, Askarov, or one of the BOS goalies please |
|
Habsolute009
Montreal Canadiens |
|
 |
Location: Toronto, ON Joined: 12.09.2010
|
|
|
So who DO you want as your #1? - braidan
None, keep rotation between 2 and trade another. It’s simple. |
|
Pat1993
Montreal Canadiens |
|
 |
Location: disguise delimit, QC Joined: 08.28.2009
|
|
|
I dont think you understand what debatable means if you are approaching that as fact. Keep trying Pat. - Habsolute009
holy poop... okay bro |
|
Pat1993
Montreal Canadiens |
|
 |
Location: disguise delimit, QC Joined: 08.28.2009
|
|
|
Ill take Devon Levi, Askarov, or one of the BOS goalies please - braidan
yesssss |
|
braidan
Referee Montreal Canadiens |
|
 |
Location: State of Corruption. Joined: 09.27.2006
|
|
|
I dont think you understand what debatable means if you are approaching that as fact. Keep trying Pat. - Habsolute009
OK so start debating instead of just crapping.
You STILL have not mentionned what you would do with the goalie situation.
We have 3 goalies, one has to start, who do you choose?
Not that complicated |
|
fidopro
Chicago Blackhawks |
|
 |
Location: Service Temporarily Unavailable, QC Joined: 08.10.2008
|
|
|
So who DO you want as your #1? - braidan
I want Vasilevski to injure himself again when he returns this weekend.
and then I want TB to trade for Monty, you know the type of deal they made the past few years. like a 1st, a 2nd, a 3rd and a 4th for Monty and RHP.
then we'll watch them win cups elsewhere and say oh look! they are so good. |
|
Habsolute009
Montreal Canadiens |
|
 |
Location: Toronto, ON Joined: 12.09.2010
|
|
|
OK so start debating instead of just crapping.
You STILL have not mentionned what you would do with the goalie situation.
We have 3 goalies, one has to start, who do you choose?
Not that complicated - braidan
Sure did, try looking above 👆 |
|
braidan
Referee Montreal Canadiens |
|
 |
Location: State of Corruption. Joined: 09.27.2006
|
|
|
None, keep rotation between 2 and trade another. It’s simple. - Habsolute009
Which do you trade?
Very hard to debate you when you wont pick a side
|
|
Pat1993
Montreal Canadiens |
|
 |
Location: disguise delimit, QC Joined: 08.28.2009
|
|
|
Which do you trade?
Very hard to debate you when you wont pick a side - braidan
we're wrong, he's right, if we can't accept that there's no conversation to be had... |
|
braidan
Referee Montreal Canadiens |
|
 |
Location: State of Corruption. Joined: 09.27.2006
|
|
|
Sure did, try looking above 👆 - Habsolute009
so wishy-washy, this i what your debate looks like...
Yeah keep 2 trade 1 they all suck but I wont say which one id trade
|
|
braidan
Referee Montreal Canadiens |
|
 |
Location: State of Corruption. Joined: 09.27.2006
|
|
|
we're wrong, he's right, if we can't accept that there's no conversation to be had... - Pat1993
He reminds me of my ex when Id ask:
do you want to do A or B?
her answer.....yes |
|
Habsolute009
Montreal Canadiens |
|
 |
Location: Toronto, ON Joined: 12.09.2010
|
|
|
I want Vasilevski to injure himself again when he returns this weekend.
and then I want TB to trade for Monty, you know the type of deal they made the past few years. like a 1st, a 2nd, a 3r and a 4th for Monty and RHP.
then we'll watch them win cups elsewhere and say oh look! they are so good.  - fidopro
Hoping this is sarcasm. Because RHP and Monty are the missing pieces? |
|
braidan
Referee Montreal Canadiens |
|
 |
Location: State of Corruption. Joined: 09.27.2006
|
|
|
we're wrong, he's right, if we can't accept that there's no conversation to be had... - Pat1993
you cant be wrong if you dont offer an opinion, so just nod and smile |
|
Habsolute009
Montreal Canadiens |
|
 |
Location: Toronto, ON Joined: 12.09.2010
|
|
|
Which do you trade?
Very hard to debate you when you wont pick a side - braidan
I’d like it to be Allen but the contract doesn’t help IMO. So that leaves Monty. Make it closer to the deadline if he can keep playing decent. Easier to move. |
|
Habsolute009
Montreal Canadiens |
|
 |
Location: Toronto, ON Joined: 12.09.2010
|
|
|
we're wrong, he's right, if we can't accept that there's no conversation to be had... - Pat1993
Sure, or I just don’t agree with you and don’t want Monty as a #1. We can agree to disagree. Difference of opinion is good after all. |
|
braidan
Referee Montreal Canadiens |
|
 |
Location: State of Corruption. Joined: 09.27.2006
|
|
|
I’d like it to be Allen but the contract doesn’t help IMO. So that leaves Monty. Make it closer to the deadline if he can keep playing decent. Easier to move. - Habsolute009
I agrEE, was that so hard?
They have to do something about the menage a trois sooner rather than later. |
|
|
|
Well until we get a legit #1 Monty is it.
the depth drops off after that. Allen, primeau and some kids.
If the return for Monty is NICE then go for it and roll with Allen Primeau if not we will have to trade Allen for mediocre package - braidan
That was my nickname in high school. |
|
braidan
Referee Montreal Canadiens |
|
 |
Location: State of Corruption. Joined: 09.27.2006
|
|
|
Sure, or I just don’t agree with you and don’t want Monty as a #1. We can agree to disagree. Difference of opinion is good after all. - Habsolute009
I get that, but they are ALL we have so technically one of them has to be front-of-the-line-Goalie I dint say #1 |
|
Pat1993
Montreal Canadiens |
|
 |
Location: disguise delimit, QC Joined: 08.28.2009
|
|
|
Sure, or I just don’t agree with you and don’t want Monty as a #1. We can agree to disagree. Difference of opinion is good after all. - Habsolute009
yes but you seem to be jumping to conclusions about other people's opinions, something you've been blaming others of doing. I never said I want Monty as #1, just saying he needs to be part of the conversation. |
|
braidan
Referee Montreal Canadiens |
|
 |
Location: State of Corruption. Joined: 09.27.2006
|
|
|
My alimony payments say otherwise |
|
Mashadar
|
|
 |
Location: Let the creamy goaltending season begin! Joined: 08.31.2014
|
|
|
Imma go with Braidan here, folks.
EDIT: Not the part about alimony. |
|
Habsolute009
Montreal Canadiens |
|
 |
Location: Toronto, ON Joined: 12.09.2010
|
|
|
My alimony payments say otherwise - braidan
Touché sir. |
|