I said that about the summer. There were people that claimed in the summer that he was the best D on the team now. The follow up post I referenced it "like I was just saying". You said no one said that... I think you need to back read actually.
- boonerbuck

I just back read & all I found was you editing your post & I quote…

‘I remember a few arguing that Hronek was a top D and best on the team like I was just saying’

to

‘ I remember a few arguing that Hronek was a top 2 D and best on the team like I was just saying.’

Busted now move along 😂

I just back read & all I found was you editing your post & I quote…

‘I remember a few arguing that Hronek was a top D and best on the team like I was just saying’

to

‘ I remember a few arguing that Hronek was a top 2 D and best on the team like I was just saying.’

Busted now move along 😂
- Nighthawk

What the (frank) are you talking about? Where's the "edit"?

First Post I made on this...

If Hronek plays the rest of the season with Hughes, continues to put up points and plays exceptional D still, there will be no arguing he's not a #2 D. It's not like other D that have been paired with Hughes who only filled a spot because of lack of choices.

It was only the summer when so many argued Hronek was a top 2 and the best D on the team.

The very next post on the same page where instead of retyping it, I just reference it...,,,,

Ikr... when the debate was about value from the Horvat trade I remember a few arguing that Hronek was a top 2 D and best on the team like I was just saying. Now that the conversation changes to how much Hronek is going to gat paid, he's no longer a top 2 D and best on the team.

This is a nightly thing you do. Log onto HB, start arguing about posts you don't actually read through.

What the (frank) are you talking about? Where's the "edit"?

First Post I made on this...



The very next post on the same page where instead of retyping it, I just reference it...,,,,



This is a nightly thing you do. Log onto HB, start arguing about posts you don't actually read through.
- boonerbuck

You daft or what? Read for yourself or you now claim no edit? I call liar.

You added ‘2’ on your edit after.

You daft or what? Read for yourself or you now claim no edit? I call liar.

You added ‘2’ on your edit after.
- Nighthawk

This pattern you display every night is pretty telling. You are a drunk and there is no hiding it.

Brad Elliott Schlossman
@SchlossmanGF
NCAA top 10/average TOI
1. L. Hutson, BU, 28:36
2. Fusco, Dartmouth, 27:05
3. Driscoll, Army, 26:22
4. Casey, Mich, 26:10
5. Foley, Dartmouth, 26:08
6. Pierce, Dartmouth, 25:59
7. Waugh, Mercy, 25:54
8. Hedden, AFA, 25:35
9. Bavaro, Notre Dame, 25:26
10. Brandon, Colgate, 25:21

They would be #1 in the nation if they gave a bunch of those minutes to Aiden Celebrini and Willander.

They would be #1 in the nation if they gave a bunch of those minutes to Aiden Celebrini and Willander.
- manvanfan

They like their 1 dimensional shiny toy. The heck with defence lol

Gezz stick a fork in TB?? 5-0 loss to the Blues.

Nick Paul on the ice for all 5 goals against.

Guess now that everyone has their contracts and they have been good for so long and two cups, they are taking a break from kicking everyones butts for a while.

They like their 1 dimensional shiny toy. The heck with defence lol
- Nighthawk

It's like watching a slower, extra defensively poor Quinn Hughes play.

Flames win! Hear those footsteps. Thursday should be a nice time for you guys, another scheduled game against a non playoff team.
- K-man25

They all are 😆

TB shut out. No points for Kuch again...

It's like watching a slower, extra defensively poor Quinn Hughes play.
- manvanfan

Rathbone

Dave Hall
@hall1289
·
2h
Jack Campbell has now allowed 13 goals on 72 shots faced at the AHL level.

This is no good.

Minus the longer resume & cup.
- Nighthawk

Minus a cup, yes. You are incorrect otherwise.

Dave Hall
@hall1289
·
2h
Jack Campbell has now allowed 13 goals on 72 shots faced at the AHL level.

This is no good.
- VANTEL

4/5m doesn’t go far these days.

Gezz stick a fork in TB?? 5-0 loss to the Blues.

Nick Paul on the ice for all 5 goals against.

Guess now that everyone has their contracts and they have been good for so long and two cups, they are taking a break from kicking everyones butts for a while.
- manvanfan

no.

There is the potential for a heart breaker here. Hronek will want to get paid and the likelihood they trade him at the TDL if the ask is too high is pretty damn low in this particular season. The Canucks have no leverage.
- boonerbuck

Y traded him when it got out that he wanted over $7M AAV on his next contract. Hronek's D was not as good in Detroit, but was much better than Chiarot.

Thank you Michael.

Thanks Mark!

Rathbone
- VANTEL

He's struggling in Wilkes-Barrie Scranton.

He was someone Ruby wanted.

Minus a cup, yes. You are incorrect otherwise.
- neem55

Colorado has won a cup. Filip Hronek 325 games in, has never played a playoff game though.

Y traded him when it got out that he wanted over $7M AAV on his next contract. Hronek's D was not as good in Detroit, but was much better than Chiarot.
- HenryHockey

He didn't have anyone good to play with in Detroit is why. Weren't going to pair Seider and Hronek together.

"You look at the numbers so far this year. The Canucks have outscored their opponents 8-2 with Conor Garland on the ice. His underlying metrics are pretty dominate too." - @harmandayal2

Beauvillier 7-1 Hoglander 9-3 Lafferty 10-4

Pettersson, Kuzmenko, Mikheyev have been not so great 5v5 this season. 9-9 so far.

Beauvillier 7-1 Hoglander 9-3 Lafferty 10-4

Pettersson, Kuzmenko, Mikheyev have been not so great 5v5 this season. 9-9 so far.
- manvanfan

Lafferty has been a little less noticeable as of late. Like to see him use his speed and size to bully by the slow Isles.

Lafferty has been a little less noticeable as of late. Like to see him use his speed and size to bully by the slow Isles.
- Quinn's Quest

He has tailed off a bit lately. Would be nice if the 4th line has some consistent contributions.