He’s got the old school gigantic phone down on the porch in Florida just giving it all out
- ClaudeFather

Haha yes, I can totally picture it! "We need more muckers and grinders."

I didn’t realize that. Reading some of Friedmans tweets I thought it was a full no movement clause.
- Sinisalo4vr

I should amend my previous comment that I think maybe that 15 team provision doesn't kick in until 25-26, he may be indeed on a full NMC until then.

If it’s a lower end prospect to be returned by Carolina. Why are the flyers doing this deal? I guess the situation has become untenable with torts? Deangelo should be a deadline deal and the flyers would sure to be getting more than a single low end prospect. The torts effect I guess.

I would not waste a retaining slot on this deal also. This narrows their deadline flexibility

If it’s a lower end prospect to be returned by Carolina. Why are the flyers doing this deal? I guess the situation has become untenable with torts? Deangelo should be a deadline deal and the flyers would sure to be getting more than a single low end prospect. The torts effect I guess.

I would not waste a retaining slot on this deal also. This narrows their deadline flexibility
- Just5

Its the Chuck Fletcher Jelly Of The Month Club. Its the gift that keeps on giving all year.

Why are the Flyers so desperate to get rid of Sanheim?

I didn’t realize that. Reading some of Friedmans tweets I thought it was a full no movement clause.
- Sinisalo4vr

It's not a NMC, it's a full NTC. In 2025-26 it turns into a 15-team NTC.

https://www.capfriendly.com/players/torey-krug

Why are the Flyers so desperate to get rid of Sanheim?
- StepfordSam

IMO 2 reasons. His contract length, cap hit, and age don't quite line up for a rebuild, and second, his full NTC kicks in on July 1st.

Jelly Of The Month.

Why are the Flyers so desperate to get rid of Sanheim?
- StepfordSam

His 8 year deal looks horrendous. He’s way overpaid. I’m not saying he stinks or anything, but he’s not the player that contract says he is.

I also think he and Torts don’t mesh.

I will say I do have some concern as there aren’t a lot of players that want to come here to play for him and I don’t want to run players out that aren’t “Torts guys” because his shelf life is finite to put it politely.

If it’s a lower end prospect to be returned by Carolina. Why are the flyers doing this deal? I guess the situation has become untenable with torts? Deangelo should be a deadline deal and the flyers would sure to be getting more than a single low end prospect. The torts effect I guess.

I would not waste a retaining slot on this deal also. This narrows their deadline flexibility
- Just5

It is absolutely the Torts effect. If Jonesy is out golfing today he needs to at least get on the phone and bring the coach in line.

These trades are dead

Why are the Flyers so desperate to get rid of Sanheim?
- StepfordSam

My guess is they don't want to be tied to him for 8 years, taking a spot that could go to a young player. He's not so good that he can help, he's not so young that it makes sense to keep him and grow and he's got some value right now. I think the team knows what they get with him and he doesn't fit. They'd rather have the cap space flexibility over the next 8 years to use on players that can be a part of the future.

Now that it's out that he was going to be traded, I think they're forced to trade him somewhere.

His 8 year deal looks horrendous. He’s way overpaid. I’m not saying he stinks or anything, but he’s not the player that contract says he is.

I also think he and Torts don’t mesh.

I will say I do have some concern as there aren’t a lot of players that want to come here to play for him and I don’t want to run players out that aren’t “Torts guys” because his shelf life is finite to put it politely.
- Flyers1218

It’s not a horrendous contract though. The length is the issue. Cap hit is “fine”.

It just seems like it’s another player the Flyers want to move on from because he isn’t thriving in Torts’ turtle style hockey.

These trades are dead
- Just5

If the TDA trade where the Flyers retain for a poop prospect is dead then good.

My guess is they don't want to be tied to him for 8 years, taking a spot that could go to a young player. He's not so good that he can help, he's not so young that it makes sense to keep him and grow and he's got some value right now. I think the team knows what they get with him and he doesn't fit. They'd rather have the cap space flexibility over the next 8 years to use on players that can be a part of the future.

Now that it's out that he was going to be traded, I think they're forced to trade him somewhere.
- atibus

That’s fine if the Flyers move him but the return better be adequate. Now it seems they are dealing from a position of weakness as it is now obvious they want to move him.

That’s fine if the Flyers move him but the return better be adequate. Now it seems they are dealing from a position of weakness as it is now obvious they want to move him.
- StepfordSam

If it was Hayes (<=30% retained) + Sanheim for Krug + 1st then I'd be happy with it.

I agree, I don't want to just dump Sanheim.

These trades are dead
- Just5

Like I said yesterday. Fake news

Not concerned at all. Still think Sanheim and Hayes get dealt. Luckily, this is draft week, all the GMs are together. A little patience and may be even Laughts gets moved this week.

Not concerned at all. Still think Sanheim and Hayes get dealt. Luckily, this is draft week, all the GMs are together. A little patience and may be even Laughts gets moved this week.
- Trox88

This is how the sausage gets made. Kind of fun watching. More fun than the past few seasons.

Krug does feel like a devil to me
- Just5

nah he fits the rangers MO better

Why are the Flyers so desperate to get rid of Sanheim?
- StepfordSam

he doesn't bring us much value

Guess somebody should have asked Krug if he would waive before a possible trade and before the media was alerted. Inexperience!

Like I said yesterday. Fake news
- SMS4016

I'm now 100% positive trades will be happening ; -)

If the TDA trade where the Flyers retain for a poop prospect is dead then good.
- Sinisalo4vr

This! You waste a salary retention and valuable cap space for a B or C prospect? At least get your 2nd rounder back! If you can’t, hold him until the deadline.

If Torts is the reason for selling low, that guy needs to go. I’d trade him for a second rounder too!

Will we ever see Tuomaala in a Flyers uniform?
- Bayareaflyer

This will be an important year for him. Needs to establish himself in Liiga first after failing to do so last year .

Mōtley Krüg destroyed the Blues deal. 🫡