I’d rather get Ritchie, a tough physical 3rd pair LHD and another bottom 6 forward over getting Kane. Won’t cost as much and this team lacks depth scoring in the bottom 6.

I’d be ok with trading Kravtsov for a young player in return, not a rental. Maybe NSH would be interested given only 3 teams in the West have a worse goals for (137) than they do. (ANA AZ CHI)
- nyrangers9479

I thought Tolvanen would've been a good swap for Krav, and then i was flabbergasted that he was waived. We absolutely missed out

I thought Tolvanen would've been a good swap for Krav, and then i was flabbergasted that he was waived. We absolutely missed out
- picklerick

And he now is excelling in Seattle

And he now is excelling in Seattle
- airjan23

And let me tell you. Tolvanen ALWAYS pans out in the NHL games and that is solely what i go by.

And let me tell you. Tolvanen ALWAYS pans out in the NHL games and that is solely what i go by.
- picklerick

He had good underlying analytics when he got waved. Very badly wanted the Rangers to claim him, but they were determined to stick with... well yeah.

I thought Tolvanen would've been a good swap for Krav, and then i was flabbergasted that he was waived. We absolutely missed out
- picklerick

Ya I was completely baffled they waived him. I’d take Trenin as our 4C and Lauzon for Kravtsov+. Add Ritchie and playoff moves are done.

Panarin Zib Vesey
Laf Chytil Kakko
Kreider Trochek Goodrow
Ritchie Trenin Gauthier

Lindgren Fox
Miller Trouba
Schneider Lauzon

Kevin Weekes
@KevinWeekes
·
36m
I’m told from another club that was highly interested and involved in the
@Canucks Horvat deal, that Van didn’t shop the offer, and locked in on the
@NYIslanders package.

Well folks
@NHL
Trade Market is open !
@espn

@NHLNetwork

@TSNHockey

@DKSportsbook
#HockeyTwitter

Ya I was completely baffled they waived him. I’d take Trenin as our 4C and Lauzon for Kravtsov+. Add Ritchie and playoff moves are done.

Panarin Zib Vesey
Laf Chytil Kakko
Kreider Trochek Goodrow
Ritchie Trenin Gauthier

Lindgren Fox
Miller Trouba
Schneider Lauzon
- nyrangers9479

Those RWs.

Kevin Weekes
@KevinWeekes
·
36m
I’m told from another club that was highly interested and involved in the
@Canucks Horvat deal, that Van didn’t shop the offer, and locked in on the
@NYIslanders package.

Well folks
@NHL
Trade Market is open !
@espn

@NHLNetwork

@TSNHockey

@DKSportsbook
#HockeyTwitter
- jimbro83

The only explanation is that they were really high on Raty

Those RWs.
- tomburton99

How/who else is out there. I think you need your 10 and 11 million dollar players playing on the same line to carry that line. I think Kakko is fine on the kid line and I think Goodrow on the 3rd is fine.

How/who else is out there. I think you need your 10 and 11 million dollar players playing on the same line to carry that line. I think Kakko is fine on the kid line and I think Goodrow on the 3rd is fine.
- nyrangers9479

Realistically we can't have Vesey up there and hope for anything great to happen. Even a vatrano type is better than that

Ya I was completely baffled they waived him. I’d take Trenin as our 4C and Lauzon for Kravtsov+. Add Ritchie and playoff moves are done.

Panarin Zib Vesey
Laf Chytil Kakko
Kreider Trochek Goodrow
Ritchie Trenin Gauthier

Lindgren Fox
Miller Trouba
Schneider Lauzon
- nyrangers9479

Trenin doesnt play center. This fails right out the gate.

How/who else is out there. I think you need your 10 and 11 million dollar players playing on the same line to carry that line. I think Kakko is fine on the kid line and I think Goodrow on the 3rd is fine.
- nyrangers9479

Available RW's that aren't wearing 88 in a certain Central city:

Nyquist
JVR
Puljujärvi
Tarasenko
Meier
Boeser

All can be discussed on why they can/can't happen. All are better options that 1st line Jimmy Vesey.

Will try and get an initial trade deadline blog up later. Less focused on the individual names, but more of a crowd source one where i pose some questions and get the readers’ views. My only ask is respect. I get the analytics view and how that indicates Kane should not be a target. But can understand the opinion that he would get a bump from changing teams and hope/belief that a movement out of Chicago and playoff push would resurrect his game, which has cleared tailed off. Keep that in mind when responding.

Those RWs.
- tomburton99

Yea duh

Will try and get an initial trade deadline blog up later. Less focused on the individual names, but more of a crowd source one where i pose some questions and get the readers’ views. My only ask is respect. I get the analytics view and how that indicates Kane should not be a target. But can understand the opinion that he would get a bump from changing teams and hope/belief that a movement out of Chicago and playoff push would resurrect his game, which has cleared tailed off. Keep that in mind when responding.
- airjan23

I'll say it for you. Can we not do the whole same Kane song and dance that we do 20x a week on here

Yea duh
- Slimtj100

Scroll up.

Will try and get an initial trade deadline blog up later. Less focused on the individual names, but more of a crowd source one where i pose some questions and get the readers’ views. My only ask is respect. I get the analytics view and how that indicates Kane should not be a target. But can understand the opinion that he would get a bump from changing teams and hope/belief that a movement out of Chicago and playoff push would resurrect his game, which has cleared tailed off. Keep that in mind when responding.
- airjan23

Every blog....

Available RW's that aren't wearing 88 in a certain Central city:

Nyquist
JVR
Puljujärvi
Tarasenko
Meier
Boeser

All can be discussed on why they can/can't happen. All are better options that 1st line Jimmy Vesey.
- tomburton99

I can’t believe you of all people want Puhljarvi

Trenin doesnt play center. This fails right out the gate.
- aecliptic

I know he was drafted as a center and hockeydb still lists him as a center

Scroll up.
- tomburton99

Yea and they suck, or will cost more than 88

A) All they did was change how two characters' relationship ended. In the game it was more implied and they ended badly. The way they did it in the show gives Joel a reason to care
B) It (frank)ing gutted me. Nick Offerman plays Ron Swanson but so much more deeply layered. The way he played the end was a masterclass
C) The people who aren't gonna like it aren't gonna like it. There's no real conversation to be had and i dont really care to
- picklerick

it was a perfectly executed divergence from the game. definitely teared up and my gf was crying her eyes out for like 20 minutes

I can’t believe you of all people want Puhljarvi
- Slimtj100

He's got good underlying analytics. This isn't hard.

Available RW's that aren't wearing 88 in a certain Central city:

Nyquist
JVR
Puljujärvi
Tarasenko
Meier
Boeser

All can be discussed on why they can/can't happen. All are better options that 1st line Jimmy Vesey.
- tomburton99

All cost way to much except maybe Nyquist. Puljujarvi has 5 goals LESS than Vesey (9 vs 4)

He's got good underlying analytics. This isn't hard.
- tomburton99

And Edmonton may want to move on from him, but he is making 3mil and an RFA, so how is he fitting in next year?

He's got good underlying analytics. This isn't hard.
- tomburton99

He also has 4 goals this year and makes 3 million bucks. He’d fit right in not being a finisher