This is exactly how we played last year. We benefited from Shesty being unbeatable, good bounces, clutch play. If all of those things don’t go right for this team they can’t win like they did last season
- picklerick

Me and you, peas and carrots.

I think the Kreider-Trocheck duo has a real chance to stick which makes the team so much deeper. More straight line players as we saw last night. A little disappointed Mika is already off the Laf/Kakko line, but in reality if he could click with Panarin this team will be really dangerous.
- TC88

And that is why I want Gauthier on that line. Let him be discount Kreider. Go to net, draw defenders to him, and let Zibanejad create with space. Goodrow killed that line last night, They did nothing with him on the ice

Tom after the Kakko goal:


- JRR1285

I just saw this. Touche.

And that is why I want Gauthier on that line. Let him be discount Kreider. Go to net, draw defenders to him, and let Zibanejad create with space. Goodrow killed that line last night, They did nothing with him on the ice
- tomburton99

They need to sit Blais and/or Brodzinski. Get Kravtsov back into the lineup and push Goodrow/Vesey down the lineup.


Can Blais be sent down to Hartford for conditioning? Might be the best thing for him to play big minutes.

Me and you, peas and carrots.
- tomburton99

Pickles and “Jerk”ins

Down 2-0 and 3-1 it’s very nice to win the game. But they need to come out better. They have this awful habit of oh poop we’re losing halfway through the game when if they would just take the bull by the horns in the first ten minutes they wouldn’t be fkin losing

I will say the devils are really good. They are going to be a problem for years

Me and you, peas and carrots.
- tomburton99

Yes, very Gump like.

They need to sit Blais and/or Brodzinski. Get Kravtsov back into the lineup and push Goodrow/Vesey down the lineup.


Can Blais be sent down to Hartford for conditioning? Might be the best thing for him to play big minutes.
- JRR1285

Blais is ineligible. He'd have to scratched for 7 games or 3 weeks. This is the 12 man forward group Gallant wants. Fine. Trade Kravtsov. But holy hell, get Goodrow out of top 6.

Yes, very Gump like.



- JRR1285

You right, you right.

What a weird game. Happy they won. But they did not deserve too. Igor wasn't asked to make a ton of saves, but the saves he made were difficult. Probably want's the first one back. Trouba Awful 2 periods, so-so 3rd period. Happy to see the kid line gererating offense. Panarin continues to pile on points. Goodrow once again sabotaged another scoring line.

Please for the love all things holy Gallant, if this line up you want please just try:

10-93-12
13-72-24
20-16-26
91-76-21
- tomburton99

Your lineup is no good if you can't figure out a spot for 74 --- gotta get him on the ice!

Me and you, peas and carrots.
- tomburton99

Don’t let the haters try to take away what we have

Blais is ineligible. He'd have to scratched for 7 games or 3 weeks. This is the 12 man forward group Gallant wants. Fine. Trade Kravtsov. But holy hell, get Goodrow out of top 6.
- tomburton99

Figured it was something like that. Then start scratching him and get him to Hartford by early January.

Your lineup is no good if you can't figure out a spot for 74 --- gotta get him on the ice!
- TommyGTrain

I think Tom is assuming that Gallant is not going to insert him into the lineup at this point. Apparently he is why the team kept losing.

Your lineup is no good if you can't figure out a spot for 74 --- gotta get him on the ice!
- TommyGTrain

Did you not get that this the Line up Gallant wants? If it were up to me the line would be

10-93-74
13-72-24
20-16-12
91-21-26
76

Again. Kravtsov isn't playing. I can't do anything about that.

Your lineup is no good if you can't figure out a spot for 74 --- gotta get him on the ice!
- TommyGTrain

I believe he qualified his statement quite well by starting with this:

Please for the love all things holy Gallant, if this line up you want please just try:

I totally agree they need to figure out a spot for VK, but that was not the point of his post.

I think Tom is assuming that Gallant is not going to insert him into the lineup at this point. Apparently he is why the team kept losing.
- JRR1285

Bingo. Gallant isn't going to play him, because Gallant is stubborn son of female dog.

I believe he qualified his statement quite well by starting with this:




I totally agree they need to figure out a spot for VK, but that was not the point of his post.
- Tonybere

Tony, my guy!

Tony, my guy!
- tomburton99

Sometimes, Tommy-boy!! Sometimes.

That was mostly from the clown. While Panarin did not light up the playoffs- he wasnt the reason they did not advance to the SCF.
- Greschnergy#4

Clown?? You are the one with a Pin Up poster like a teenager. If maybe he played better they would have advanced.

Sometimes, Tommy-boy!! Sometimes.
- Tonybere

Clown?? You are the one with a Pin Up poster like a teenager. If maybe he played better they would have advanced.
- Brukie

That was mostly from the clown. While Panarin did not light up the playoffs- he wasnt the reason they did not advance to the SCF.
- Greschnergy#4

Once again, you are wrong, many people poop on him during the playoffs, I wasnt the one beating that drum till after it was known he wasnt hurt, Richard.

Bingo. Gallant isn't going to play him, because Gallant is stubborn son of female dog.
- tomburton99

Not that I don’t agree with you about Kravtsov but he certainly isn’t changing it up after 4 wins in a row

I’ve said they are waiting for a trade to come about therefore not playing him. For fear he’ll get hurt going for a water bottle

- JRR1285

did you pull that off of geocities?

did you pull that off of geocities?
- Mtlca66

Just a google image search and I liked this variant.