That one had me fuming.
- JRR1285

I hear ya. Just kind of heat of the moment play. He probably felt bad because Stone was hurting

A good sign too is after they tied it with that 5 on 3, last few weeks they wouldn’t folded and probably lose like 4-1 or something. They moved past it pretty quick and played even better after it

The dumber penalty on the night was Lindgren on Stone. Being already short handed.

Not that I want you to kill Lindgren for 3 hours
- Slimtj100

That call was because Stone looked hurt. Similar play happens several times a game and never called. I think he was trying to stop Stone from getting to the rebound, though one didn't end up existing

That call was because Stone looked hurt. Similar play happens several times a game and never called. I think he was trying to stop Stone from getting to the rebound, though one didn't end up existing
- airjan23

That got him good. Right on the side ribs. Oofah that’s a painful area

Fair enough. Good way to look at it. I think we are all just frustrated with Gallant's usage of him.
- JRR1285

As am I. Not playing Kravstov right now, even if he did make some sort of structural mistakes, makes zero sense to me. It can only benefit the team in the long term. Whether it's because he improves, or we decide to move him.
But, as TJ said, that's not Goodrow's fault. And in my opinion, his much maligned fight was a direct proponent of the squad picking up their play in the last 25 minutes last night.

- picklerick

I am gonna start calling you Neo-Tom.

That one had me fuming.
- JRR1285

That one actually had me mad at the refs (and Stone). We were on the PK, which generally give you more leeway in front of the net and Lindgren didn't even extend his arms through the crosschecking motion. That play happens 50 times a game. If Stone didn't drop like he was hit by a sniper (not saying he wasn't actually hurt - it looked like it hit an unprotected area somehow) then the refs just look away.

As am I. Not playing Kravstov right now, even if he did make some sort of structural mistakes, makes zero sense to me. It can only benefit the team in the long term. Whether it's because he improves, or we decide to move him.
But, as TJ said, that's not Goodrow's fault. And in my opinion, his much maligned fight was a direct proponent of the squad picking up their play in the last 25 minutes last night.
- Tonybere

The Goodrow hate is silly. He does have 12 pts in 28 games. If he had 2-3-4 ok he’s a scrub. Wether we want him to do it or not is irrelevant, but the fact is he can actually go onto any line and be good enough for it. Unlike say Hunt for example. He’s as versatile as they come. Integral player for winning teams, on the ice and off it

I hear ya. Just kind of heat of the moment play. He probably felt bad because Stone was hurting

A good sign too is after they tied it with that 5 on 3, last few weeks they wouldn’t folded and probably lose like 4-1 or something. They moved past it pretty quick and played even better after it
- Slimtj100

That they did. My mood was in the poopter since I was expecting them to fold like a cheap suit again. But they got through it and gave us a good reason to stay up so late.

Didn't that game seem to end exceptionally late?

That one actually had me mad at the refs (and Stone). We were on the PK, which generally give you more leeway in front of the net and Lindgren didn't even extend his arms through the crosschecking motion. That play happens 50 times a game. If Stone didn't drop like he was hit by a sniper (not saying he wasn't actually hurt - it looked like it hit an unprotected area somehow) then the refs just look away.
- Tonybere

It looked like he got him somewhere unprotected like you said. Or he hit him in an injured spot or something. He looked legit in pain. The replay looked more benign than it looked live. Bad luck.

The Goodrow hate is silly. He does have 12 pts in 28 games. If he had 2-3-4 ok he’s a scrub. Wether we want him to do it or not is irrelevant, but the fact is he can actually go onto any line and be good enough for it. Unlike say Hunt for example. He’s as versatile as they come. Integral player for winning teams, on the ice and off it
- Slimtj100

You're not wrong. He is versatile, a Fast type of player. I really just want to keep seeing Kravtsov because he oozes potential. I am tired of seeing guys like Brodzinski et al in the lineup.

Full disclosure. This exact conversation is why he is no longer is here. Because for like 30 seconds it was a positive day, but Goodrow gave the puck away twice and that’s all we can muster up in conversation 🤷🏻‍♂️
- Slimtj100

Tell him to grow thicker skin.

That they did. My mood was in the poopter since I was expecting them to fold like a cheap suit again. But they got through it and gave us a good reason to stay up so late.

Didn't that game seem to end exceptionally late?
- JRR1285

I think it was normal. Like 1230ish it ended I think

I think it was normal. Like 1230ish it ended I think
- Slimtj100

I'm just too old I guess.

Tell him to grow thicker skin.
- Brukie

Ooooor we can be positive after a nice win🤷🏻‍♂️is it really that hard?

What are we female doging about Panarin today for?

Ooooor we can be positive after a nice win🤷🏻‍♂️is it really that hard?
- Slimtj100

Tell Jimmy to stop being a puss and get his ass in here.

Tell him to grow thicker skin.
- Brukie

Oh snap.

Oh snap.
- tomburton99

Don't talk to him too much.

Ooooor we can be positive after a nice win🤷🏻‍♂️is it really that hard?

What are we female doging about Panarin today for?
- Slimtj100

Well, I don't really like his hair.

Tell Jimmy to stop being a puss and get his ass in here.
- JRR1285

Why he’ll just be a complete doosh too

Ooooor we can be positive after a nice win🤷🏻‍♂️is it really that hard?

What are we female doging about Panarin today for?
- Slimtj100

Nothing? Cause Panarin isn't the issue on that line. Especially last night.

Ooooor we can be positive after a nice win🤷🏻‍♂️is it really that hard?

What are we female doging about Panarin today for?
- Slimtj100

As I said before, I dont like to live game to game rather by multiple games at a time.

Panarin looked liked he played with some heart, which is nice for one game but I want to see it for a few games in a row.

Nothing? Cause Panarin isn't the issue on that line. Especially last night.
- tomburton99

He looked like 2019 Breadman

Why he’ll just be a complete doosh too
- Slimtj100

I need it.

Don't talk to him too much.
- JRR1285

Don't worry, I'm sure I'll piss Burkie off somehow. That's why I do.