It honestly may come to something like that. Would you be willing to include Kakko to get JT Miller
- TPC

I would. I would also include Laf but they would also have to take Nemeth and nothing else if Vanc went that direction.

I would. I would also include Laf but they would also have to take Nemeth and nothing else if Vanc went that direction.
- Greschnergy#4

Come on…

You’d trade both Laf and Kakko for JT Miller…

You must be out yo mind boy

No, absolutely not.

If we trade either of those guys, their replacements in the roster need to be included with Miller.

We’d then be complaining how the left side or RW have even more holes.
- Bean_Dip

Well my thinking is if you traded Kakko for Miller, you could play Miller at center and move Strome to RW

I would. I would also include Laf but they would also have to take Nemeth and nothing else if Vanc went that direction.
- Greschnergy#4

Including Laf would be a mistake. Still think he pans out. Kakko I would include

I would. I would also include Laf but they would also have to take Nemeth and nothing else if Vanc went that direction.
- Greschnergy#4

Laf, K'Andre, Nils/Jones, 1st rd pick for JT and Elias and a 4th (because they always do something weird like that)

Come on…

You’d trade both Laf and Kakko for JT Miller…

You must be out yo mind boy
- Bean_Dip

never said that

never said that
- Greschnergy#4

you said you'd also include Laf, which makes it sound like you'd include both instead of replacing kakko with laf.

i wouldn't want to trade either of them for just JT

Laf, K'Andre, Nils/Jones, 1st rd pick for JT and Elias and a 4th (because they always do something weird like that)
- picklerick

this has merit

you said you'd also include Laf, which makes it sound like you'd include both instead of replacing kakko with laf.

i wouldn't want to trade either of them for just JT
- Mtlca66

ok teacher- i will try better next time -

never said that
- Greschnergy#4

You said “I would. I’d also include Laf”.

Probably misunderstood you. Coffee hasn’t kicked in yet

you said you'd also include Laf, which makes it sound like you'd include both instead of replacing kakko with laf.

i wouldn't want to trade either of them for just JT
- Mtlca66

Ask TPC if he understood what I meant in our conversation?

you said you'd also include Laf, which makes it sound like you'd include both instead of replacing kakko with laf.

i wouldn't want to trade either of them for just JT
- Mtlca66

I’m with you. You know who we gave up on because they weren’t showing growth at the pace we wanted?

JT Miller!

Ask TPC if he understood what I meant in our conversation?
- Greschnergy#4

I thought you meant either Kakko or Laf

I would. I would also include Laf but they would also have to take Nemeth and nothing else if Vanc went that direction.
- Greschnergy#4

You are insane! No way you trade Miller, KK or Laf for JT.

I thought you meant either Kakko or Laf
- TPC

we should trade kreider while his value is high and put laf in his spot

You said “I would. I’d also include Laf”.

Probably misunderstood you. Coffee hasn’t kicked in yet
- Bean_Dip

I would include either separately in deals that include but not both- I would prefer it to Laf over Kakko for a few reasons

1- Right wing (or make -up with Krav)
2- Laf has more trade Value
3- Laf was kind of a fluky lucky draft pick - we earned kakko

Reminder JT Miller is not PPG player when he gets to the Rangers until he earns PP time, right now he is on the second unit if he were a Ranger.

we should trade kreider while his value is high and put laf in his spot
- Mtlca66

his value will never be higher

I thought you meant either Kakko or Laf
- TPC

Of course- you had context

I would include either separately in deals that include but not both- I would prefer it to Laf over Kakko for a few reasons

1- Right wing (or make -up with Krav)
2- Laf has more trade Value
3- Laf was kind of a fluky lucky draft pick - we earned kakko

Reminder JT Miller is not PPG player when he get to the ranger until he earns PP time, right now he is on the second unit if he were a Ranger.
- Greschnergy#4

I’m sorry. We’re just going to have to agree to disagree on this one. Trading Laf/Kakko for JT Miller is so Glen Sather, even Glen Sather would be impressed.

And we all had context, this is a public message board lol

I don’t buy the Miller talk. Vancouver is still in the mix because that division sucks

I do however think the chychrun rumors are real. Just think of the top 4 if we got Chychrun- w/Fox Trouba and Lindgren. That would easily be a top 5 dcorp in the league. His contract is definitely a positive too. The 5-6 pair are Schneider and *insert name here* (plenty of options)

I could see where we get all 3 of Chychrun, Kessel and Crouse. All 3 is a bit crazy, but def one of the wingers. I’d be willing to have Kakko in the trade, but not Schnieder or Laf

Kakko-Kandre and our first for chychrun and Crouse. Crouse def would be a gallant kind of player. He’s a little better offensively than Blais is, but have similar games imo

I’m sorry. We’re just going to have to agree to disagree on this one. Trading Laf/Kakko for JT Miller is so Glen Sather, even Glen Sather would be impressed.

And we all had context, this is a public message board lol
- Bean_Dip

but you missed it ?

You are insane! No way you trade Miller, KK or Laf for JT.
- Brukie

When its all said and done - I think JT will have had the best career out of them. ..and why not get him him while he is peaking since we kind of have a age window and positional need now

but you missed it ?

- Greschnergy#4

This is silly. It was an understandable misunderstanding.

Let’s get back to selling the farm for JT Miller

The JT Miller we traded away no longer exists. The only player that remains is this JT Miller right now.

This is silly. It was an understandable misunderstanding.

Let’s get back to selling the farm for JT Miller
- Bean_Dip

I’m sorry. We’re just going to have to agree to disagree on this one.