Saying her accusations are reputable is a brutal take.
- bobbyisno1

Why?

Because you know her?

He’s under investigation, so clearly he hasn’t been proven guilty yet.

Terrible take.

You’re aware this isn’t the first we’ve heard of these accusations right?
- burn

So investigate, telling the entire world gives some major bad backlash.

So if I said something about my neighbor should the police investigate that?
- bobbyisno1

...Yes?

Accusations lead to investigations.

Investigations lead to evidence that either suggests someone is guilty or innocent.

Why?

Because you know her?
- burn

Because you don't.
And I'm better neither does the NHL investigators.

So investigate, telling the entire world gives some major bad backlash.
- bobbyisno1

Considering his previous record, do you really want to side with Kane on this one. He's a know idiot

Considering his previous record, do you really want to side with Kane on this one. He's a know idiot
- Archaic

Well I'm not siding with her. she's obviously not very bright. Kane could lose everything, in turn so will she.

So investigate, telling the entire world gives some major bad backlash.
- bobbyisno1

They are so what’s your point.

She’s brought this to the the attention, but according to you this shouldn’t be investigated because ‘estranged wife’

Just a brutal take

Considering his previous record, do you really want to side with Kane on this one. He's a know idiot
- Archaic

Lol

Was he the guy that posted pics with bricks of money? What kind of balloonhead even takes out bricks of cash and puts pictures on the infernet lol

Considering his previous record, do you really want to side with Kane on this one. He's a know idiot
- Archaic

This gambling first came out in 2019, and now they are getting wind of throwing games? Seems fishy.

Well I'm not siding with her. she's obviously not very bright. Kane could lose everything, in turn so will she.
- bobbyisno1

Likely at this point Kane was gonna bottom out either way.

They are so what’s your point.

She’s brought this to the the attention, but according to you this shouldn’t be investigated because ‘estranged wife’

Just a brutal take
- burn

First they heard of throwing games from an angry tweet 2 years later?

Because you don't.
And I'm better neither does the NHL investigators.
- bobbyisno1

That doesn’t matter. If that was intact his wife and those are real then that is brutal, on multiple accounts.

You are coming off as extremely arrogant and egotistical saying it’s up to you to determine you can and can’t be believed for investigation.

It’s a good thing that law doesn’t work that way.

This gambling first came out in 2019, and now they are getting wind of throwing games? Seems fishy.
- bobbyisno1

What's fishy about a degenerate gambler doing ddegenerate gambler things? It's like a guy has a booze problem, next thing he crashes his car. It's not surprising.

That doesn’t matter. If that was intact his wife and those are real then that is brutal, on multiple accounts.

You are coming off as extremely arrogant and egotistical saying it’s up to you to determine you can and can’t be believed for investigation.

It’s a good thing that law doesn’t work that way.
- burn

Well look at the facts we do know, a casino sued him for money owed, did they bring up betting on his own games?
He went through bankruptcy for gambling did anyone say he was betting on hockey?
I'll bet the NHL looked into then and now they are just saying this as a PR move.

Well look at the facts we do know, a casino sued him for money owed, did they bring up betting on his own games?
He went through bankruptcy for gambling did anyone say he was betting on hockey?
I'll bet the NHL looked into then and now they are just saying this as a PR move.
- bobbyisno1

Nice

The worst is if you try to fix games but you STILL lose the bet, that's gotta suck.

What's fishy about a degenerate gambler doing ddegenerate gambler things? It's like a guy has a booze problem, next thing he crashes his car. It's not surprising.
- Zezel

Next thing is, He sucks the wrong end of a Glock.

Well look at the facts we do know, a casino sued him for money owed, did they bring up betting on his own games?
He went through bankruptcy for gambling did anyone say he was betting on hockey?
I'll bet the NHL looked into then and now they are just saying this as a PR move.
- bobbyisno1

Him owing money to a casino and filling for bankruptcy has nothing to do with betting on his own NHL games. Why would they investigate that then?

From disgruntled exes with vendettas.. Yes.
- bobbyisno1

Well guys abandon their kids.
Its understandable

What's fishy about a degenerate gambler doing ddegenerate gambler things? It's like a guy has a booze problem, next thing he crashes his car. It's not surprising.
- Zezel

Whats fishy is that nobody said anything about throwing games ever, till his wife tweets it to the world.
People taking all these bets that bankrupted him say nothing about him betting on hockey? That's fishy.

You're right, guilty until proven innocent.
- bobbyisno1

I think in this case, Kane has proven who/what kind of person he is throughout the years.

Him owing money to a casino and filling for bankruptcy has nothing to do with betting on his own NHL games. Why would they investigate that then?
- Steven_Seagull

If he's a degenerate gambler don't you think they would want to know if he's sports betting?
especially on his own team.

So if I said something about my neighbor should the police investigate that?
- bobbyisno1

Well ya. Of course they would.
If they found nothing, then they come looking into you and why

If he's a degenerate gambler don't you think they would want to know if he's sports betting?
especially on his own team.
- bobbyisno1

You know what could offer some insight and answers to all of these questions you have?

An investigation.

Whats fishy is that nobody said anything about throwing games ever, till his wife tweets it to the world.
People taking all these bets that bankrupted him say nothing about him betting on hockey? That's fishy.
- bobbyisno1

You’re surprised that a bookie (who made millions off all Kane’s losses)didn’t turn him in for betting on his own games (if true)


I don’t think you’re thinking this though probably