|
|
|
|
https://www.tsn.ca/video/toffoli-not-using-groin-injury-as-an-excuse-for-his-play~2234549 - Reubenkincade
Covid is an excuse / Toffoli's groin acceptable
|
|
Nucker101
Vancouver Canucks |
|
 |
Location: Vancouver, BC Joined: 09.26.2010
|
|
|
|
|

You gotta love it - Nucker101
|
|
|
|

You gotta love it - Nucker101
Yes, I thought it was a good move by a veteran like Toffoli to come out and say how he played like sh it, and isn't using a groin injury as an excuse.
|
|
manvanfan
Vancouver Canucks |
|
 |
Location: MB Joined: 01.21.2012
|
|
|
ITALY!!!!! |
|
manvanfan
Vancouver Canucks |
|
 |
Location: MB Joined: 01.21.2012
|
|
|
Canadiens going after Olesiak seems as if they have talked to Seattle and have been told they are losing Chariot or Edmundson whoever they don't protect. |
|
|
|
Canadiens going after Olesiak seems as if they have talked to Seattle and have been told they are losing Chariot or Edmundson whoever they don't protect. - manvanfan
Montreal is going to protects 8 and 1 so they don't lose any of the top 4 defenseman. |
|
manvanfan
Vancouver Canucks |
|
 |
Location: MB Joined: 01.21.2012
|
|
|
Montreal is going to protects 8 and 1 so they don't lose any of the top 4 defenseman. - Reubenkincade
I would think they have more than 4 forwards they would like to protect.
Gallagher, Kotkaniemi, Toffoli, Anderson, Armia?, Evans?
|
|
|
|
I would think they have more than 4 forwards they would like to protect.
Gallagher, Kotkaniemi, Toffoli, Anderson, Armia?, Evans? - manvanfan
You would protect 2 4th liners over a top 4 defenseman? |
|
manvanfan
Vancouver Canucks |
|
 |
Location: MB Joined: 01.21.2012
|
|
|
You would protect 2 4th liners over a top 4 defenseman? - Reubenkincade
That's something you would do.
I'd protect the upside of the forward group that is much more lacking over 1 semi top 4 D that obviously can be replaced pretty easily. |
|
Retinalz
Vancouver Canucks |
|
 |
Location: Vancouver, BC Joined: 01.31.2015
|
|
|
What a lot of people don't seem to realize when talking about poaching someone from a team for cheap so they don't lose them for nothing is that it doesn't necessarily lower their value. I Seattle is taking player X you need to make an offer worth losing player X and Y, because they still need to lose a guy to Seattle. If you don't make that offer, it's better to lose player X and be done with it. |
|
LeftCoaster
San Jose Sharks |
|
 |
Location: Shark City, CA Joined: 07.03.2009
|
|
|
That's something you would do.
I'd protect the upside of the forward group that is much more lacking over 1 semi top 4 D that obviously can be replaced pretty easily. - manvanfan
That's what Dale Tallon did, protecting upside in Bjugstad, Petrovic and Pysyk instead protecting Marchessault and Reilly Smith.....whoops. |
|
|
|
manvanfan
Vancouver Canucks |
|
 |
Location: MB Joined: 01.21.2012
|
|
|
That's what Dale Tallon did, protecting upside in Bjugstad, Petrovic and Pysyk instead protecting Marchessault and Reilly Smith.....whoops. - LeftCoaster
Edmundson probably gone Seattle. Sign Olesiak to the same contract when free agency hits. |
|
manvanfan
Vancouver Canucks |
|
 |
Location: MB Joined: 01.21.2012
|
|
|
So far no real off the board picks in the Jan Levine draft.
Guenther to SJ at 7
LA to pick with McTavish, Clarke still on the board possibly Wallstedt, or Cossa who has now come out as a possible top 10 pick according to some. Hopefully Van trades back in real life to get real value for their pick. |
|
Marwood
Vancouver Canucks |
|
 |
Location: Cumberland, BC Joined: 03.18.2010
|
|
|
|
|
LordHumungous
Vancouver Canucks |
|
 |
Location: Greetings from the Humungous. Ayatollah of rock and rolla! Joined: 08.15.2014
|
|
|
I think he went the last 11 games without scoring . He still is a good player though. - VANTEL
At this point of his career looks like he's a regular season guy only. Glad we passed. |
|
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Location: Canuckville, BC Joined: 01.09.2015
|
|
|
At this point of his career looks like he's a regular season guy only. Glad we passed. - LordHumungous
We could've used TT but moving on is ok 👍 |
|
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Location: Canuckville, BC Joined: 01.09.2015
|
|
|
Older vets like TT & Pearson are fine but best if the 3rd wheel not part of a line duo in the top 6. |
|
manvanfan
Vancouver Canucks |
|
 |
Location: MB Joined: 01.21.2012
|
|
|
We coul’ve used TT but moving on is ok 👍 - Nighthawk
Others worrying about 1 player scoring. Toffoli was 2nd in the team in scoring. Guys not a superstar, he's a supporting cast player. Where's the rest of the team?
Josh Anderson getting 1.25M more per year than Toffoli and he had half the points.
Probably a buyout contract in a year or two Anderson. |
|
manvanfan
Vancouver Canucks |
|
 |
Location: MB Joined: 01.21.2012
|
|
|
At this point of his career looks like he's a regular season guy only. Glad we passed. - LordHumungous
Yup, 2nd on the team in the playoffs in scoring. Definitely regular season only. |
|
|
|
At this point of his career looks like he's a regular season guy only. Glad we passed. - LordHumungous
We didn't pass Benning ran out of time. |
|
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Location: Canuckville, BC Joined: 01.09.2015
|
|
|
Yup, 2nd on the team in the playoffs in scoring. Definitely regular season only.  - manvanfan
Goes to say how boring the Habs are & the lack of scoring talent is upfront. |
|