Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Location: Canuckville, BC Joined: 01.09.2015
|
|
|
After watching Kucherov's presser and how Ovi partied all summer after winning the cup, I think the NHL needs more Russians in it.
Loved Kucherov trash talking the Habs fans! - Marwood
It was refreshing lol
No more vanilla NHL player interviews would help the gane. |
|
|
|
Listen to the man with a lifetime of practical experience trying to find a cure for himself.  - rojan61
Did I upset you because I don't like shiny Hughes, or is it because I express my opinion openly and don't give a f uck what others think. |
|
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Location: Canuckville, BC Joined: 01.09.2015
|
|
|
Everyone has a different idea of what a big win is though. - VANTEL
Miller was a win. Next up for another key piece would follow that up nicely. Yes differing opinions out there for sure.
Giving up a controlled ELC pick magnifies the importance. |
|
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Location: Canuckville, BC Joined: 01.09.2015
|
|
|
With the endorsement of Benning from ownership, you should feel confident that he will make a big splash in player additions. That Schmidt trade speaks columns of what to expect.
Just give him time, he’s got this. - K-man25
JB is juggling a few balls atm. A splash will come & how he does overall will make or break next season & probably beyond. |
|
|
|
Miller was a win. Next up for another key piece would follow that up nicely. Yes differing opinions out there for sure.
Giving up a controlled ELC pick magnifies the importance. - Nighthawk
Exactly my point . I thought Miller was a win but a fair amount of fans or media didn't feel the same.
|
|
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Location: Canuckville, BC Joined: 01.09.2015
|
|
|
Most thought the Schmidt trade was a huge win.
#canucksfansgetwhattheydeserve.
😁 - Reubenkincade
I liked the trade it wasn’t a loss. Next up is how to trampoline into the next deal. That’ll go under the microscope for sure lol
|
|
Marwood
Vancouver Canucks |
|
 |
Location: Cumberland, BC Joined: 03.18.2010
|
|
|
Did I upset you because I don't like shiny Hughes, or is it because I express my opinion openly and don't give a fuck what others think. - Reubenkincade
|
|
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Location: Canuckville, BC Joined: 01.09.2015
|
|
|
 - VANTEL
Impressive pillars 😂 |
|
1970vintage
Seattle Kraken |
|
 |
Location: BC Joined: 11.11.2010
|
|
|
Exactly my point . I thought Miller was a win but a fair amount of fans or media didn't feel the same. - VANTEL
I still don’t. By the time the team is good he’ll be a UFA. If we’re calling Petey Pouty then Miller is Super Pouty.
Good player, I like him, but I’d rather they kept drafting and waited until he was a FA, or signed another guy they liked.
Now, if it had been Miller for a 3rd, I’d consider that a win. |
|
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Location: Canuckville, BC Joined: 01.09.2015
|
|
|
That Schmidt trade really showed me how dumb not only Benning is, but how smart this fanbase is. - Reubenkincade
Cost only a 3rd not much imo but reliant on what Schmidt is traded for or if a substantial rebound. |
|
|
|
Impressive pillars 😂 - Nighthawk
It speaks columns |
|
Marwood
Vancouver Canucks |
|
 |
Location: Cumberland, BC Joined: 03.18.2010
|
|
|
Miller was a win. Next up for another key piece would follow that up nicely. Yes differing opinions out there for sure.
Giving up a controlled ELC pick magnifies the importance. - Nighthawk
No it wasn't.
It was another example of Benning being too pumped too soon. Miller will be gone by the end of next season. He can go feel sorry for himself on another team. |
|
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Location: Canuckville, BC Joined: 01.09.2015
|
|
|
Did I upset you because I don't like shiny Hughes, or is it because I express my opinion openly and don't give a fuck what others think. - Reubenkincade
Hughes is the classic 1 dimensional D man. Burns is a big example pun intended lol
It still comes down to designing a D corp that covers all bases & is far from that. 1 piece at a time. |
|
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Location: Canuckville, BC Joined: 01.09.2015
|
|
|
Exactly my point . I thought Miller was a win but a fair amount of fans or media didn't feel the same. - VANTEL
Pros…added a legit top liner
Cons…a later pick ELC went out
Boils down to short & long term results. So far so good. |
|
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Location: Canuckville, BC Joined: 01.09.2015
|
|
|
I still don’t. By the time the team is good he’ll be a UFA. If we’re calling Petey Pouty then Miller is Super Pouty.
Good player, I like him, but I’d rather they kept drafting and waited until he was a FA, or signed another guy they liked.
Now, if it had been Miller for a 3rd, I’d consider that a win. - 1970vintage
The 20oa pick for Miller
https://www.hockeydb.com/...s/pdisplay.php?pid=225854
Is that a game changer or worth it? |
|
|
|
Pros…added a legit top liner
Cons…a later pick ELC went out
Boils down to short & long term results. So far so good. - Nighthawk
It has been talked about over and over , like I said some will like it some wont . This is my point , if Benning trades this year pick there is going to be a percentage that will be against it. Damned if you do Damned if you don't .
I stand by my first comment that we don't even seem to know this draft who is good and who is not good . Opinions are all over the place even more than most years.
|
|
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Location: Canuckville, BC Joined: 01.09.2015
|
|
|
No it wasn't.
It was another example of Benning being too pumped too soon. Miller will be gone by the end of next season. He can go feel sorry for himself on another team. - Marwood
Aah ok. What would be your tune without him & waiting on the 20oa pick to develop?
https://www.hockeydb.com/...s/pdisplay.php?pid=225854
Would you show your usual patience or move on to another gripe? |
|
1970vintage
Seattle Kraken |
|
 |
Location: BC Joined: 11.11.2010
|
|
|
The 20oa pick for Miller
https://www.hockeydb.com/...s/pdisplay.php?pid=225854
Is that a game changer or worth it? - Nighthawk
Could be? What has Miller accomplished here? He’s good and all that, but my opinion is they should have kept building. Without Miller they probably aren’t in the thingy, the pick is much higher than 20th and they get another dynamic player. If it doesn’t make sense I’m sure Nucker can fill you in on the butterfly effect. |
|
SMP8719
Vancouver Canucks |
|
 |
Location: ALDY , BC Joined: 02.24.2012
|
|
|
Aah ok. What would be your tune without him & waiting on the 20oa pick to develop?
https://www.hockeydb.com/...s/pdisplay.php?pid=225854
Would you show your usual patience or move on to another gripe? - Nighthawk
Keep in mind it would have been a better pick if we didn't have JTM. I dunno how much... but he was a big contributor.
|
|
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Location: Canuckville, BC Joined: 01.09.2015
|
|
|
It has been talked about over and over , like I said some will like it some wont . This is my point , if Benning trades this year pick there is going to be a percentage that will be against it. Damned if you do Damned if you don't .
I stand by my first comment that we don't even seem to know this draft who is good and who is not good . Opinions are all over the place even more than most years. - VANTEL
Trading a 9oa vs 20oa is a bigger gamble. 20th was not all that expensive but 9th could back fire. |
|
|
|
The 20oa pick for Miller
https://www.hockeydb.com/...s/pdisplay.php?pid=225854
Is that a game changer or worth it? - Nighthawk
The guy can't hit the net if he tried. I seen him play a few times. Good defensively . His aim is so bad that one game after a bad play he took his helmet off in frustration and threw it on the floor . He missed.
|
|
|
|
I liked the trade it wasn’t a loss. Next up is how to trampoline into the next deal. That’ll go under the microscope for sure lol - Nighthawk
Really. You must have missed my comment on smart canuck fans. |
|
SMP8719
Vancouver Canucks |
|
 |
Location: ALDY , BC Joined: 02.24.2012
|
|
|
Could be? What has Miller accomplished here? He’s good and all that, but my opinion is they should have kept building. Without Miller they probably aren’t in the thingy, the pick is much higher than 20th and they get another dynamic player. If it doesn’t make sense I’m sure Nucker can fill you in on the butterfly effect. - 1970vintage
Beat me to it
|
|
|
|
Trading a 9oa vs 20oa is a bigger gamble. 20th was not all that expensive but 9th could back fire. - Nighthawk
Yeah but from the comments I have seen on here you very easily could be drafting Gaunce all over again at 9
|
|
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Location: Canuckville, BC Joined: 01.09.2015
|
|
|
Could be? What has Miller accomplished here? He’s good and all that, but my opinion is they should have kept building. Without Miller they probably aren’t in the thingy, the pick is much higher than 20th and they get another dynamic player. If it doesn’t make sense I’m sure Nucker can fill you in on the butterfly effect. - 1970vintage
Also same for you…
Could you be patient with the rebuild without Miller? Top 6 wingers were not very deep at all. |
|