This is and never was called charging. Those were for hits to the head moron.
- TurdFergeson

YOU - https://www.nhl.com/video...ame/t-277440360/c-7819430

ARE - https://www.nhl.com/video...es/t-277440360/c-64982503

WRONG - https://www.nhl.com/video...es/t-277440360/c-50279403

I accept your apology. Moron.

Good. As a "referee" you should really brush up on previous DOPS decisions. They really help when trying to figure out what's legal and what isn't.
- Kcannon98

Every argument you make is just a complete joke. I’m convinced you’re trolling. If not...


42.3 Major Penalty – The Referee, at his discretion, may assess a major penalty, based on the degree of violence of the check, to a player guilty of charging an opponent (see 42.5).
42.4 Match Penalty – The Referee, at his discretion, may assess a match penalty if, in his judgment, the player attempted to or deliberately injured his opponent by charging.
42.5 Game Misconduct Penalty - When a major penalty is imposed under this rule for a foul resulting in an injury to the face or head of an opponent, a game misconduct shall be imposed.
42.6 Fines and Suspensions – Refer to Rule 23.6 – Fines and Suspensions – Physical Fouls Category.
If deemed appropriate, supplementary discipline can be applied by the Commissioner at his discretion (refer to Rule 28).

I don't even get how you did to last that long... He's trolling you.
- MightyPee

the patience of a saint

But if somebody does push a moose off an airplane than there is a law to cover, even though it has been on the books for a while and rarely if ever inforced IT IS STILL a law
- braidan

Well.....they should have known that it was Rocky the Squirrel that could fly.....NOT BULLWINKLE!!!!!

Do you also not understand the difference between a moderator on a hockey website and an NHL referee?
- eichiefs9

Of course I do. I was mocking him for thinking he's smarter than everyone else because he moderates a blog.

Every argument you make is just a complete joke. I’m convinced your trolling. If not...


42.3 Major Penalty – The Referee, at his discretion, may assess a major penalty, based on the degree of violence of the check, to a player guilty of charging an opponent (see 42.5).
42.4 Match Penalty – The Referee, at his discretion, may assess a match penalty if, in his judgment, the player attempted to or deliberately injured his opponent by charging.
42.5 Game Misconduct Penalty - When a major penalty is imposed under this rule for a foul resulting in an injury to the face or head of an opponent, a game misconduct shall be imposed.
42.6 Fines and Suspensions – Refer to Rule 23.6 – Fines and Suspensions – Physical Fouls Category.
If deemed appropriate, supplementary discipline can be applied by the Commissioner at his discretion (refer to Rule 28).
- TurdFergeson

Your wrong streak is getting longer.

Good. As a "referee" you should really brush up on previous DOPS decisions. They really help when trying to figure out what's legal and what isn't.
- Kcannon98

Ok, last time you dense mother(frank)er. You're stuck on the distance traveled line. We get it.

A few strides? Good hit.

Across half the (frank)ing arena? CHARGING.

When was the last player to be suspended for "distance traveled?"

Hint - It's never happened.
- Kcannon98

How would I know? I dont keep a log of all charging infractions.

It doesnt matter. DoPS failure to be consistent does not change the fact it is charging.

Your wrong streak is getting longer.
- Kcannon98

Cool. I guess you are right and the actual rule book is wrong.
I feel sorry for anyone in your life.

Ok, last time you dense mother(frank)er. You're stock on the distance traveled line. We get it.

A few strides? Good hit.

Across half the (frank)ing arena? CHARGING.


- Darksyde

I never brought up the distance traveled thing. You guys did because that's your only argument. He didn't leave his feet. He didn't target the head. That's the only thing left.

DOPS will suspend him because of social pressure but not because of any rule on the books.

nice mouth.

Of course I do. I was mocking him for thinking he's smarter than everyone else because he moderates a blog.
- Kcannon98

So by trying to explain the rules I think I'm smarter?
Wow do you also think I disappear during peek-=a-boo?

the patience of a saint
- Pat1993

I witnessed that !

Cool. I guess you are right and the actual rule book is wrong.
I feel sorry for anyone in your life.
- TurdFergeson

I just posted 3 (out of many) videos from the department of player safety proving you wrong.

So by trying to explain the rules I think I'm smarter?
Wow do you also think I disappear during peek-=a-boo?
- braidan

Nope, not because you're trying to explain rules. It's the way to present yourself and you do it because you have that little citation under your name. You're a moderator on a blog. Take it easy.

I just posted 3 (out of many) videos from the department of player safety proving you wrong.
- Kcannon98

Not one was relevant. Proving yourself wrong again. Every post you make just makes you look dumber.

I never brought up the distance traveled thing. You guys did because that's your only argument. He didn't leave his feet. He didn't target the head. That's the only thing left.

DOPS will suspend him because of social pressure but not because of any rule on the books.

nice mouth.
- Kcannon98

Nope, not because you're trying to explain rules. It's the way to present yourself and you do it because you have that little citation under your name. You're a moderator on a blog. Take it easy.
- Kcannon98

At what point was I even disrespectful of you or your opinion?
I am trying to have a discussion with you

I never brought up the distance traveled thing. You guys did because that's your only argument. He didn't leave his feet. He didn't target the head. That's the only thing left.

DOPS will suspend him because of social pressure but not because of any rule on the books.

nice mouth.
- Kcannon98

Does not matter who brought it up. Distance traveled IS part of the rule.

How do you not understand that? The actual rule has been posted in these threads many times.

Does not matter who brought it up. Distance traveled IS part of the rule.

How do you not understand that? The actual rule has been posted in these threads many times.
- Nasty_Duck

But it wasn't charging, so the distance travelled is irrelevant

So by trying to explain the rules I think I'm smarter?
Wow do you also think I disappear during peek-=a-boo?
- braidan

Hockey Central podcast went full cuck as you might expect. Low-T hockey commentary

But it wasn't charging, so the distance travelled is irrelevant
- braidan

12 pages....ek is getting a new kitchen

Imagine a world where Scheifele arrived 2/10ths of a second earlier and knocked Evans off the puck, negating an open-net goal.

We'd all be saying "Great hit", wouldn't we?

Imagine a world where Scheifele arrived 2/10ths of a second earlier and knocked Evans off the puck, negating an open-net goal.

We'd all be saying "Great hit", wouldn't we?
- Nh_kong

Imagine a world where MS even tried to prevent a goal on that play and the reaction would have been different