|
|
I honestly think Islanders are the team we need to look to catch. Having 3 games against them, win them and we are back to 2 points back. Not going to be easy but I just don't see us catching Boston with their schedule. - TPC
With a win and a little help from Philly today we could be 6 back of them with a monster game vs them on Tuesday. I hate Putin. |
|
aecliptic
New York Rangers |
|
|
Location: Stacheville Joined: 06.17.2010
|
|
|
Getting harder and harder to justify an “upgrade” from Strome. He is due for a raise soon. Only 28. One more year on what is now a bargain. And this thing he has going on with Bread, is it worth breaking up? It’s going to cost the same or more if they go elsewhere. The 3C is a bigger issue. Chytil is meh...maybe he is having lingering Covid issues. I don’t know. These by the way are glare at problems to have. They do have to move pieces bc there are too many now. What an off-season this is going to be. - Blueshirts4ever
Ive taken a step back on all the Strome stuff. However, the question you have to ask is when he does become a free agent next year, what are you offering him? He will be 29 years old, staring down the tipping point that is 30. Personally, anything longer than 4 years is too much, and anything more than 7.5-8m is too much. Yes, he plays really well with Panarin, but honestly... who wouldnt? Strome lacks too much in other places and situations that hes not worth a penny more.
However, lets say we keep Strome what we really have to do then is upgrade on Chytil. We need a young, stud 3C who can play a 200ft game and will grow into the 2C role when Strome's contract is done. |
|
jimbro83
New York Rangers |
|
|
Location: Lets Go Rangers!, NY Joined: 12.25.2009
|
|
|
bottom line
Panarin was great before he got here, but he wasn't the 2nd best player in the NHL
He is absolutely the 2nd best player in the NHL playing in Quinn's system
it's an absolute fact
so people still calling for a coaching change should really take that into consideration |
|
aecliptic
New York Rangers |
|
|
Location: Stacheville Joined: 06.17.2010
|
|
|
bottom line
Panarin was great before he got here, but he wasn't the 2nd best player in the NHL
He is absolutely the 2nd best player in the NHL playing in Quinn's system
it's an absolute fact
so people still calling for a coaching change should really take that into consideration - jimbro83
For me, the test will come down to what I said about Quinn when he first got hired. Can he coach a team in the NHL playoffs? Can he make the right in-game adjustments? Its a totally different animal. |
|
|
|
bottom line
Panarin was great before he got here, but he wasn't the 2nd best player in the NHL
He is absolutely the 2nd best player in the NHL playing in Quinn's system
it's an absolute fact
so people still calling for a coaching change should really take that into consideration - jimbro83
If he was still with the blackhawks yes he would of been but not with the bluejackets |
|
aecliptic
New York Rangers |
|
|
Location: Stacheville Joined: 06.17.2010
|
|
|
With a win and a little help from Philly today we could be 6 back of them with a monster game vs them on Tuesday. I hate Putin. - Blueshirts4ever
Im definitely concerned about the teams energy playing these 4 games, finishing off on a b2b. I think it got to them the second half of that 3rd game. |
|
ELew11
New York Rangers |
|
Location: Huntington Beach, CA Joined: 07.22.2016
|
|
|
I’m not a Strome lover, or hater. All I care about is production and the team winning.
A lot of people credit all of Strome’s success to playing with Panarin, but Panarin’s numbers with Strome are also the best he has ever had. Point is, they “just work” together. I refuse to believe Panarin would have had the same numbers if he played with Chytil the last 2 years.
In any event, Buch and Strome need to understand the state of affairs these days.
There is a flat cap for the next 4 years, they are in a place that it is working for them, and the future of this team…. If they want to remain a part of this, and be a part of what we all believe is future championships, they need to accept reasonable contracts. If not, so long
|
|
|
|
bottom line
Panarin was great before he got here, but he wasn't the 2nd best player in the NHL
He is absolutely the 2nd best player in the NHL playing in Quinn's system
it's an absolute fact
so people still calling for a coaching change should really take that into consideration - jimbro83
Or people calling to take his center away |
|
jimbro83
New York Rangers |
|
|
Location: Lets Go Rangers!, NY Joined: 12.25.2009
|
|
|
Im definitely concerned about the teams energy playing these 4 games, finishing off on a b2b. I think it got to them the second half of that 3rd game. - aecliptic
hopefully the 2nd half of yesterday's game was a wakeup call for today's game
they simply must finish off this 4 game sweep, this would be an absolutely devestating loss today
|
|
|
|
I’m not a Strome lover, or hater. All I care about is production and the team winning.
A lot of people credit all of Strome’s success to playing with Panarin, but Panarin’s numbers with Strome are also the best he has ever had. Point is, they “just work” together. I refuse to believe Panarin would have had the same numbers if he played with Chytil the last 2 years.
In any event, Buch and Strome need to understand the state of affairs these days.
There is a flat cap for the next 4 years, they are in a place that it is working for them, and the future of this team…. If they want to remain a part of this, and be a part of what we all believe is future championships, they need to accept reasonable contracts. If not, so long - ELew11
I have no problem with Strome , if it works it works |
|
aecliptic
New York Rangers |
|
|
Location: Stacheville Joined: 06.17.2010
|
|
|
Or people calling to take his center away - nyrangers9479
If the money and term arent team friendly, you have to move on.
Im gonna go back to a trade that already happened but could potentially work in our favor. PLDubois. Wasnt happy in CBJ, understably so Torts has that effect. Traded to WPG and things dont seem to be better for him there. If the price was right, could reunite PLD with Panarin, if Strome's numbers dont work. |
|
Tonybere
New York Rangers |
|
|
Location: ON Joined: 02.04.2016
|
|
|
Ive taken a step back on all the Strome stuff. However, the question you have to ask is when he does become a free agent next year, what are you offering him? He will be 29 years old, staring down the tipping point that is 30. Personally, anything longer than 4 years is too much, and anything more than 7.5-8m is too much. Yes, he plays really well with Panarin, but honestly... who wouldnt? Strome lacks too much in other places and situations that hes not worth a penny more.
However, lets say we keep Strome what we really have to do then is upgrade on Chytil. We need a young, stud 3C who can play a 200ft game and will grow into the 2C role when Strome's contract is done. - aecliptic
This discussion is ignoring the fact that Strome scored 33 points as a Ranger in the partial season he was here before we had Panarin. And also put up 10 points in the 11 games with out him this year.
Is it not possible that he’s a decent to good 2C that simply took a while to figure it out at the NHL level, regardless of his linemates?
(...who is undeniably not good on face offs) |
|
aecliptic
New York Rangers |
|
|
Location: Stacheville Joined: 06.17.2010
|
|
|
This discussion is ignoring the fact that Strome scored 33 points as a Ranger in the partial season he was here before we had Panarin. And also put up 10 points in the 11 games with out him this year.
Is it not possible that he’s a decent to good 2C that simply took a while to figure it out at the NHL level, regardless of his linemates?
(...who is undeniably not good on face offs) - Tonybere
Again, Im not knocking him. Im not saying we shouldnt keep him. Im just saying hes gonna be 29 years old in his contract year. My concern is he will want to get paid. Hes gonna want term and money. For a guy that is one dimensional, if the term and money doesnt work for us, then Im comfortable enough with this team to move on from him and using our plethora of assets to bring in a replacement. |
|
Brukie
New York Rangers |
|
|
Location: Putnam, NY Joined: 06.14.2011
|
|
|
This discussion is ignoring the fact that Strome scored 33 points as a Ranger in the partial season he was here before we had Panarin. And also put up 10 points in the 11 games with out him this year.
Is it not possible that he’s a decent to good 2C that simply took a while to figure it out at the NHL level, regardless of his linemates?
(...who is undeniably not good on face offs) - Tonybere
Agreed Tony, How easy it is for some to forget that Panarins production has INCREASED while playing with Strome. It seems they have formed a tight bond also. 2 games ago when Srome was hit with that hip check, it was Panarin that went after the Devil that hit him. Fans love to focus on the why didnt he shoot or why how did he not shoot. He sucks, blaa, blaa, blaa. He has settled in and fit nicely with Panarin. At 4.5 he is a bargain. Thing is what is he looking for next contract? 5.5 to 6 per for 3 years?? Reasonable if he produces next yer also. |
|
|
|
Awolff9
New York Rangers |
|
Joined: 02.05.2020
|
|
|
Again, Im not knocking him. Im not saying we shouldnt keep him. Im just saying hes gonna be 29 years old in his contract year. My concern is he will want to get paid. Hes gonna want term and money. For a guy that is one dimensional, if the term and money doesnt work for us, then Im comfortable enough with this team to move on from him and using our plethora of assets to bring in a replacement. - aecliptic
I like Strome don’t love him. There are moments during the game I want to pull my hair out because of a horrible play in the defensive zone or a dumb penalty he has the occasion to take. I will say, this is his best year in the NHL when it comes to his overall game. Sucks to say I wouldn’t want to resign him unless he willing to do like 4 years at like 6 mill per. Really don’t want to offer anything more. I believe we need to raise the ceiling when it comes to down the middle. No doubt Panarin and Strome work so well together but a new contract has to be very reasonable for someone entering there 30’s in today’s NHL and was a nobody before coming to the Rangers. |
|
aecliptic
New York Rangers |
|
|
Location: Stacheville Joined: 06.17.2010
|
|
|
Agreed Tony, How easy it is for some to forget that Panarins production has INCREASED while playing with Strome. It seems they have formed a tight bond also. 2 games ago when Srome was hit with that hip check, it was Panarin that went after the Devil that hit him. Fans love to focus on the why didnt he shoot or why how did he not shoot. He sucks, blaa, blaa, blaa. He has settled in and fit nicely with Panarin. At 4.5 he is a bargain. Thing is what is he looking for next contract? 5.5 to 6 per for 3 years?? Reasonable if he produces next yer also. - Brukie
This is no where NEAR what Im expecting him to ask for. I expect him to ask for atleast 7.5-8m for 6-7 years with a NMC/NTC. |
|
picklerick
New York Rangers |
|
|
Location: New York, NY Joined: 03.01.2018
|
|
|
Caps are sucking - way out west
I don’t think the bruins end up in the 4th spot. Not sure we can catch anyone but our best bet is probably the isles |
|
TommyGTrain
New York Rangers |
|
Location: Part of NJ where its Taylor Ham not pork roll Joined: 05.19.2017
|
|
|
This is no where NEAR what Im expecting him to ask for. I expect him to ask for atleast 7.5-8m for 6-7 years with a NMC/NTC. - aecliptic
Prior to COVID, that would be a reasonable demand. However because of the flat cap, that is no longer reasonable and truthfully, when the Rangers say no, who will give him that $$$ and term?
Teams are broke due to lack of revenue and I just don't see many large contracts being given out across the entire league... |
|
aecliptic
New York Rangers |
|
|
Location: Stacheville Joined: 06.17.2010
|
|
|
I don’t think the bruins end up in the 4th spot. Not sure we can catch anyone but our best bet is probably the isles - picklerick
Just based on the Isles schedule, its gonna be really close. |
|
picklerick
New York Rangers |
|
|
Location: New York, NY Joined: 03.01.2018
|
|
|
Just based on the Isles schedule, its gonna be really close. - aecliptic
They play the flyers tonight, the caps a few times, and us 3 times. We gotta beat them all 3 times and win one more game outside of our series than they do |
|
aecliptic
New York Rangers |
|
|
Location: Stacheville Joined: 06.17.2010
|
|
|
Prior to COVID, that would be a reasonable demand. However because of the flat cap, that is no longer reasonable and truthfully, when the Rangers say no, who will give him that $$$ and term?
Teams are broke due to lack of revenue and I just don't see many large contracts being given out across the entire league... - TommyGTrain
...and this is why I want the Rangers to make the move for Barkov, they can afford to pay him.
In all seriousness, if he asks for anything less than 7.5m Id be shocked.
Id tell him 3y @ 6m per, take it or leave it.
However, we have to keep in mind this next year. We have no idea how next years schedule will pan out and how the salary cap will be affected going into 22-23 off-season and forward. |
|
ELew11
New York Rangers |
|
Location: Huntington Beach, CA Joined: 07.22.2016
|
|
|
Our Powerplay loves the Devils |
|
aecliptic
New York Rangers |
|
|
Location: Stacheville Joined: 06.17.2010
|
|
|
The inability to clear the zone still haunts this team. |
|
Brukie
New York Rangers |
|
|
Location: Putnam, NY Joined: 06.14.2011
|
|
|
This is no where NEAR what Im expecting him to ask for. I expect him to ask for atleast 7.5-8m for 6-7 years with a NMC/NTC. - aecliptic
Ahh ok, but he took 4.5 per for 2 years. He knows his bread and butter, so does the rest of the league. These connections are far and few between. I think he gets it by him taking his current contract. |
|