Lucic did play the Puck, fair game.
- bobbyisno1

Don’t make me rewind

I thought he did too.

If he’s fair game it’s not interference. He was eligible to be hit. The hit wasn’t a penalty (ie high, knee, from behind, boarding)
- burn

It was interference. If he's not hit he gets the puck, if he isn't hit he does. That's interference 101. The "he was fair game to be hit" does not have merit if it is a clear infraction. It's no different than the idea that you can't take 20 strides at a player just because he is fair game to be hit.

Gallagher gone... again.

Wrong
- bobbyisno1

Okay Karen, thanks for the insightful contribution. 😂

- Steven_Seagull

Garnie’s next

It was interference. If he's not hit he gets the puck, if he isn't hit he does. That's interference 101. The "he was fair game to be hit" does not have merit if it is a clear infraction. It's no different than the idea that you can't take 20 strides at a player just because he is fair game to be hit.
- joel878

Difference is anybody playing the Puck can be hit within a reasonable time. And that Puck just came off his stick. Fair game.

Okay Karen, thanks for the insightful contribution. 😂
- joel878

Wrong again.

Staal looks like a goof in a Habs uni

All is good now.

It was interference. If he's not hit he gets the puck, if he isn't hit he does. That's interference 101. The "he was fair game to be hit" does not have merit if it is a clear infraction. It's no different than the idea that you can't take 20 strides at a player just because he is fair game to be hit.
- joel878

It wasn’t interference.


It wasn’t an infraction because he was fair game to be hit.

It wasn’t interference.


It wasn’t an infraction because he was fair game to be hit.
- burn

Don't tell him, he called me Karen. That tells me he doesn't even know what a woman is.

Wrong again.
- bobbyisno1

So it wasn't an insightful contribution? 🤣

All is good now.
- Woderwick

Remember the slumping Leafs?

We now have the third best record in the league over the past 10 games.

It wasn’t interference.


It wasn’t an infraction because he was fair game to be hit.
- burn

He blatantly interfered with Lucic being able to get the puck, maybe the issue is your lack of understanding of what interference is. Being fair game to be hit does not allow you to take a penalty on the player.

You are absolutely the RogerRoeper of arguing that refs (frank)ed the leafs. I know you will stay up until 6 am refusing to let this die, full disclosure... I don't really care that much. Have it. 😂

It was interference. If he's not hit he gets the puck, if he isn't hit he does. That's interference 101. The "he was fair game to be hit" does not have merit if it is a clear infraction. It's no different than the idea that you can't take 20 strides at a player just because he is fair game to be hit.
- joel878

Your analogy is bonkers. Of course you can’t take 20 strides to hit a guy who is fair game because that is a penalty. Terrible comparison.

The Simmonds hit wasn’t a penalty (high, from behind, charging , boarding, etc) he was called for a penalty because the ref said he was ineligible to be hit (even you agreed he was eligible)

James Mirtle
@mirtle
This is the first time in franchise history the Leafs have 55 points or more after 39 games.

A 116-point pace, their best in franchise history.
12:18 AM · Apr 6, 2021


So, fire Dubas and Keefe?

So it wasn't an insightful contribution? 🤣
- joel878

C'mon man, he just played the Puck, he's allowed to be hit.

Don't tell him, he called me Karen. That tells me he doesn't even know what a woman is.
- bobbyisno1

Do you want to speak to my manager about this?

You're right, calling you Karen was wrong. When someone sits on the sidelines and just jumps in with 'wrong', that's more worthy of being called Donald Trump than it is Karen. 😂

Remember the slumping Leafs?

We now have the third best record in the league over the past 10 games.
- Atomic Wedgie

I don’t want to say too much for fear of the jinx. I am sure the last slump was my fault.

C'mon man, he just played the Puck, he's allowed to be hit.
- bobbyisno1

Whether he just played it or not, he's not allowed to be interfered with from getting the puck. If he's not hit, he gets the puck. That's a two minute penalty, it's called interference... Having just played the puck does not suddenly make it not a penalty. 🤦🏻‍♂️

He blatantly interfered with Lucic being able to get the puck, maybe the issue is your lack of understanding of what interference is. Being fair game to be hit does not allow you to take a penalty on the player.

You are absolutely the RogerRoeper of arguing that refs (frank)ed the leafs. I know you will stay up until 6 am refusing to let this die, full disclosure... I don't really care that much. Have it. 😂
- joel878

Holy (frank). Go to bed.

Do not tell someone they don’t understand when you clearly don’t know what interface is.


What penalty did he commit? You keep saying he was eligible to be hit but that doesn’t mean you are now allowed to commit a penalty.

So how good are the Habs without Gallagher now?

James Mirtle
@mirtle
This is the first time in franchise history the Leafs have 55 points or more after 39 games.

A 116-point pace, their best in franchise history.
12:18 AM · Apr 6, 2021


So, fire Dubas and Keefe?
- Steven_Seagull

“Took best team they ever had and ruined it”