Fixed and yes
- Steven_Seagull

I like Tanev because he made Hughes a Norris candidate. He could do the same for Sandin.

That trade would make the Leafs a nearly perfect team.

So since Dubas has given up on that Sandin prospect, would you trade him for former 6th overall pick Jake Virtanen? Fix that top 6 rite up.
- DrunkenCanuck

'
Virtanen is shyte. No one wants him, he wouldn't make the Leafs taxi squad. Doubt even the Kraken takes him if he is exposed.

He’s the new Frankie Corrado. Marincin above Sandin makes no sense. Why not trade him for a solid offer if he’s not going to play?
- DrunkenCanuck

I counter with Lillygreen and Vesey for Tanner Pearson (retained)

Bennett with another goal
- Steven_Seagull

That’s 10 in his last 65 regular season games with 5 assists. But one good playoff makes up for that I guess. But he wants to be traded so I guess he’s our guy

That’s 10 in his last 65 regular season games with 5 assists. But one good playoff makes up for that I guess. But he wants to be traded so I guess he’s our guy
- Canada Cup

Still better than most of our bottom-6, and with better hands than Mikheyev.

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Edit: and as for the bold. Bennett has 11 goals and 19 points in 30 playoff games. (6 goals and 13 points in the last 15 games). Seems like he does well in the playoffs. In comparison, Nylander has 5 goals and 15 points in 25 playoff games.

Matrix>Bennett

Still better than most of our bottom-6, and with better hands than Mikheyev.

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Edit: and as for the bold. Bennett has 11 goals and 19 points in 30 playoff games. (6 goals and 13 points in the last 15 games). Seems like he does well in the playoffs. In comparison, Nylander has 5 goals and 15 points in 25 playoff games.
- Steven_Seagull

Why do we want to give up assets for a $2.55M RFA for our bottom 6? Or did you want to go full AA and replace him for Nylander?

Why do we want to give up assets for a $2.55M RFA for our bottom 6? Or did you want to go full AA and replace him for Nylander?
- Canada Cup

His remaining daily cap hit is less than 1.9M and is decreasing every day.

He’s depth. He’s better than most of the guys in the bottom-6 - an area that is criticized for not being good enough - and he’ll help that. Ideally they add a legitimate top-6 winger, though.

Why did Tampa trade a 1st and a prospect for Coleman then another 1st for Goodrow? All they did was improve their chances to win the Cup. Which they did.

Why do we want to give up assets for a $2.55M RFA for our bottom 6? Or did you want to go full AA and replace him for Nylander?
- Canada Cup

Going full AA is a major improvement over going full Santard.

baby steps.

And i obviously didnt say trade them straight up, buttwipe.

So this morning obviously sucks.

If we had won, we’d be seven points up on the Habs.

Instead we are three.

Tavares and Willy need to get their poop together..

His remaining daily cap hit is less than 1.9M and is decreasing every day.

He’s depth. He’s better than most of the guys in the bottom-6 - an area that is criticized for not being good enough - and he’ll help that. Ideally they add a legitimate top-6 winger, though.

Why did Tampa trade a 1st and a prospect for Coleman then another 1st for Goodrow? All they did was improve their chances to win the Cup. Which they did.
- Steven_Seagull

They didn't trade a top 6 player for them though, that's the difference.

No one saying we don't need to improve these areas, but don't weaken top end to fix bottom end.

They didn't trade a top 6 player for them though, that's the difference.

No one saying we don't need to improve these areas, but don't weaken top end to fix bottom end.
- burn

Who’s trading a top-6 forward?* I only used Nylander as a comparison. I could’ve used Marner or Matthews instead.


*besides AA

Who’s trading a top-6 forward?* I only used Nylander as a comparison. I could’ve used Marner or Matthews instead.


*besides AA
- Steven_Seagull

Yeah he posted a trade for Nylander and then you posted a reply saying fixed which involved Nylander

Yeah he posted a trade for Nylander and then you posted a reply saying fixed which involved Nylander
- burn

I replaced Tanev with Andersson.

I replaced Tanev with Andersson.
- Steven_Seagull

JUDAS!

Talented guy just seems to wilt when contact starts happening.
- Aetherial

That's why I don't get why teams last year just stood aside and allowed him to go to net front and score more than anyone. Fix must've been in.

The rub with Bennet is he's not going to fit into the Leafs bottom 6 cap allocation going forward and he sees himself as a top 6 guy.

So you trade for him ONLY if you believe he's a top 6 Hyman type of guy and you're ready to pay him 3+ for a couple years.

The rub with Bennet is he's not going to fit into the Leafs bottom 6 cap allocation going forward and he sees himself as a top 6 guy.

So you trade for him ONLY if you believe he's a top 6 Hyman type of guy and you're ready to pay him 3+ for a couple years.
- The Law

In other words, no.

Come on Bennett, throw away the chicken poop gun, you don't just want to pull the trigger, you want to put the knife in me, and look me in the eye, and see what's going on in there when you turn it, that's what you want to do, right?

The rub with Bennet is he's not going to fit into the Leafs bottom 6 cap allocation going forward and he sees himself as a top 6 guy.

So you trade for him ONLY if you believe he's a top 6 Hyman type of guy and you're ready to pay him 3+ for a couple years.
- The Law

Wood + Severson for Nylander works 👍

I'd keep Nylander. Trading him is what Chiarelli'd do.😁

In other words, no.
- Zezel

Ya, I don't see it. Leafs can lock up two 3rd liners for 3 Milly instead.

Wood + Severson for Nylander works 👍
- mr.sir

This D (yes, it's early) is the best I've seen in Toronto for more than a decade. I'm taking a temporary break from trading Willie for a D.

Things may change in the summer with the expansion draft and depending on how the playoffs go.

I'd keep Nylander. Trading him is what Chiarelli'd do.😁
- Zezel

Depends on the return

The rub with Bennet is he's not going to fit into the Leafs bottom 6 cap allocation going forward and he sees himself as a top 6 guy.

So you trade for him ONLY if you believe he's a top 6 Hyman type of guy and you're ready to pay him 3+ for a couple years.
- The Law

Bennett career renewal strategy

Step 1. Ask for trade - done
Step 2. Wait for Leaf fans to declare you a legitimate top 6 forward - done
Step 3. Wait for Dave Nonis to return as Leaf GM