Location: The centre of the hockey universe Joined: 07.31.2006
Feb 4 @ 9:56 AM ET
You're allowed to find it silly, that's your call. But when I say "Josh Anderson is hurt, that contract won't age well"... And the response is an accusation that I'm making fun of someone getting hurt from a guy who also states a death will be celebrated, I'm allowed to point out that hypocrisy as I'm the one the accusation was levelled at.
Don't believe I require your validation either. 🤷 - joel878
Pro tip: if you don't require people's validation, quit responding to them; your response is validation.
Location: God Leafs Satan The Oneness, ON Joined: 02.28.2011
Feb 4 @ 9:59 AM ET
Some MAGAts already feel betrayed because Trump somehow let them down on 6th and on Inauguration Day when he just left instead of arresting all the Lib pedophiles. But overall it’s true that the idea of Trump is what drives these crazies. If cared about who he really was and how what he did in terms of policy actually affected them, they’d put him on a list with AOC and Pelosi.
Hopefully the longer he is deplatformed, the weaker his broad influence will be. Hopefully. - Canada Cup
Trump is irrelevant at this point. The real problems are wealth inequality and information tech filter bubbles. How that gets fixed I dunno.
Lol. It’s a conversation but feel free to kiss the ring (but only the ring) whenever you want. I get that AA gets everyone bent out of shape and that every time you guys post is going to be an accusation. I was just commenting on the logic. - Canada Cup
Absolutely, and like I said, you're entitled to that. That would be my acknowledgement that it is in fact a discussion. We can all do logic commenting whenever we want, for example I could randomly question the logic behind daily political commentary on a hockey thread.
But again as it is a discussion, I was simply pointing out that I don't need your validation, just as you don't need mine. It's a discussion. 🤷
Location: Not here to sell jerseys , ON Joined: 07.06.2007
Feb 4 @ 10:04 AM ET
Absolutely, and like I said, you're entitled to that. That would be my acknowledgement that it is in fact a discussion. We can all do logic commenting whenever we want, for example I could randomly question the logic behind daily political commentary on a hockey thread.
But again as it is a discussion, I was simply pointing out that I don't need your validation, just as you don't need mine. It's a discussion. 🤷 - joel878
Location: God Leafs Satan The Oneness, ON Joined: 02.28.2011
Feb 4 @ 10:07 AM ET
A good example of how messed up the information space is: when I google 'Leafs', a Tanner article is frequently in the top results. I know them just by their titles.
Think about that. The Leafs are one of the biggest sports teams in the world. Arguably the most famous hockey team. And if a newbie is googling them, they will be getting confident, sage analysis from a hipster troll who has never been to an NHL hockey game.
Location: Not here to sell jerseys , ON Joined: 07.06.2007
Feb 4 @ 10:11 AM ET
A good example of how messed up the information space is: when I google 'Leafs', a Tanner article is frequently in the top results. I know them just by their titles.
Think about that. The Leafs are one of the biggest sports teams in the world. Arguably the most famous hockey team. And if a newbie is googling them, they will be getting confident, sage analysis from a hipster troll who has never been to an NHL hockey game. - Zezel
Location: The centre of the hockey universe Joined: 07.31.2006
Feb 4 @ 10:14 AM ET
A good example of how messed up the information space is: when I google 'Leafs', a Tanner article is frequently in the top results. I know them just by their titles.
Think about that. The Leafs are one of the biggest sports teams in the world. Arguably the most famous hockey team. And if a newbie is googling them, they will be getting confident, sage analysis from a hipster troll who has never been to an NHL hockey game. - Zezel
Doesn't it work that the algorithms are heavily biased towards your browsing history?
So you probably get Tanner because of Hockeybuzz, but a newbie would never see his crap.
Lol. It’s a conversation but feel free to kiss the ring (but only the ring) whenever you want. I get that AA gets everyone bent out of shape and that every time you guys post is going to be an accusation. I was just commenting on the logic. - Canada Cup
Cause he's a whiny little female dog.
He laughed and was happy when Anderson was hurt, it was gross. Now he's trying to draw a false comparison to me saying i'll celebrate Trumps death (i will) because i damaged him so bad that he cant stop thinking about me. It's (frank)ing sad that this is what his life is about, trying to get some kind of schoolyard revenge so he can sleep at night lol.
Location: The centre of the hockey universe Joined: 07.31.2006
Feb 4 @ 10:17 AM ET
Cause he's a whiny little female dog.
He laughed and was happy when Anderson was hurt, it was gross. Now he's trying to draw a false comparison to me saying i'll celebrate Trumps death (i will) because i damaged him so bad that he cant stop thinking about me. It's (frank)ing sad that this is what his life is about, trying to get some kind of schoolyard revenge so he can sleep at night lol.
Pro tip: if you don't require people's validation, quit responding to them; your response is validation. - Atomic Wedgie
Ahhh, well played confucius. I would argue a response is validation to a person's commentary, however... Does not validate the need for their validation. If you get what I'm putting down.
Such as I am validating your response right now, but that doesn't change that I didn't need that validation. Coming from a savvy vet such as yourself I'm still happy to validate such a pro tip however. 🤷
