hell yeah

- Pat1993

*puts hat on and everything*

a good bong usually is kind of expensive. i know this $40 jawn isn't gonna be like the one i broke. it's gonna be thinner glass and all. but it just tastes so much better with glass than anything else. and also if i break a $40 bong i won't care as much as if i break a $150 bong.
- kicksave856

but at 150$, isn't the glass a bit thicker and less breakable? that would be one of the main reasons I would throw extra dollars...

but at 150$, isn't the glass a bit thicker and less breakable? that would be one of the main reasons I would throw extra dollars...
- Pat1993

yeah but it's just so heartbreaking if you do break it. the sink is so much more dangerous than you ever thought it was until your standing over it shaking your bong.

i dropped mine right off the counter so i had no chance, but yeah you have a better chance of surviving knocking it over on the table or whatever if it's a thicker more expensive one.

a good bong usually is kind of expensive. i know this $40 jawn isn't gonna be like the one i broke. it's gonna be thinner glass and all. but it just tastes so much better with glass than anything else. and also if i break a $40 bong i won't care as much as if i break a $150 bong.
- kicksave856

lol. you're a Flyers fan, alright.

I'm sure they got it from context, but 'jawn' probably isn't in their lexicon. Your 'Philly' is showing.

yeah but it's just so heartbreaking if you do break it. the sink is so much more dangerous than you ever thought it was until your standing over it shaking your bong.

i dropped mine right off the counter so i had no chance, but yeah you have a better chance of surviving knocking it over on the table or whatever if it's a thicker more expensive one.
- kicksave856

alright, thanks for the help I'll try to find something in the middle I guess lol (and be extra careful with it, even though I know a clumsy moment is bound to happen)

alright, thanks for the help I'll try to find something in the middle I guess lol (and be extra careful with it, even though I know a clumsy moment is bound to happen)
- Pat1993

i'll let you know how this cheap one is if it ever gets here. looks like they ship up there too.

i'll let you know how this cheap one is if it ever gets here. looks like they ship up there too.
- kicksave856

sounds good. and yeah I think they do, can you re-post the link? I don't want someting too fancy, but of decent quality so that it doesn't shatter the moment you slighlty knock it

The story about Jake and Mike is on the Flyers blog if you dare venture there.
- Heywood Jablome

Gonna have to contain McDavid, obviously...

4-1 Habs (Gallagher, Petry, Anderson & Kotkaniemi)

Also, how is it that my weekly matchup score hasn't changed since opening night?

[quote=Heywood Jablome]

really? I still have WASH, BOS and even NYI ahead of them
- fidopro

I don’t know how Boston after losing Chara and Krug will be able to get ahead of Philly. Wash, Philly, NYI then BOS is my guess.

Do we know what the reporter did to deserve that? Seems a bit harsh...someone needs to tell Jake to stop reading the sports pages
- Karine Hains

From Bill Meltzer:
Today @ 9:29 AM ET
I was in the room when the (non) incident happened last season. Voracek was simply chatting with JVR after practice and wasn't even close enough to Vigneault to hear what the coach was saying at the moment. He wasn't laughing behind the coach's back. He was simply in the same room as the coach, and he and JVR chuckled over something.

No one thought anything of it, except Mike, I guess.

I was also in the room the day after the article was published. Jake was peeved at Mike, and understandably so (because the article made it seem like he was insubordinate or didn't care about the team being in a funk). But Sielski wasn't there, and Voracek was perfectly amiable with the rest of us. Last night was their first interaction since then, apparently.

Here's something to know about Jake. Normally he's someone who blows up in the moment, says what's on his mind, and then it's over. In this case, I guess, he filed it away until his next interaction with Mike.

From Bill Meltzer:
Today @ 9:29 AM ET
I was in the room when the (non) incident happened last season. Voracek was simply chatting with JVR after practice and wasn't even close enough to Vigneault to hear what the coach was saying at the moment. He wasn't laughing behind the coach's back. He was simply in the same room as the coach, and he and JVR chuckled over something.

No one thought anything of it, except Mike, I guess.

I was also in the room the day after the article was published. Jake was peeved at Mike, and understandably so (because the article made it seem like he was insubordinate or didn't care about the team being in a funk). But Sielski wasn't there, and Voracek was perfectly amiable with the rest of us. Last night was their first interaction since then, apparently.

Here's something to know about Jake. Normally he's someone who blows up in the moment, says what's on his mind, and then it's over. In this case, I guess, he filed it away until his next interaction with Mike.
- KINGKENZO

what's sielski's rep in the Philly media?

Hey Guys...

If anyone has a sample of a post where I came onto a Habs thread and started trashing players, or the team or was trolling you guys on your thread, in any way...

can you send it to this takemedrunkhome guy? I don't know what the F he is thinking of.

Hey Guys...

If anyone has a sample of a post where I came onto a Habs thread and started trashing players, or the team or was trolling you guys on your thread, in any way...

can you send it to this takemedrunkhome guy? I don't know what the F he is thinking of.
- Aetherial

montreal had their biggest win of the year last night. Let them have this.

montreal had their biggest win of the year last night. Let them have this.
- mr.peanut

I guess I will wait until takedrunkenhome finds an example of me trolling you guys... or sobers up and realizes he is talking about someone else.

I guess I will wait until takedrunkenhome finds an example of me trolling you guys... or sobers up and realizes he is talking about someone else.
- Aetherial

Get out of here TROLL!!



Oh sh!t, sorry that was meant for Peanut

I guess I will wait until takedrunkenhome finds an example of me trolling you guys... or sobers up and realizes he is talking about someone else.
- Aetherial

No, you're correct. I was on the wrong guy. On me completely, my apologies

No, you're correct. I was on the wrong guy. On me completely, my apologies
- Takemedrunkimhome

Wow, you don't hear that much on Hockeybuzz, or the internet at all for that matter; thanks.

At least tell me who trolls you guys all the time... is it French? RogerRoeper?

and can someone tell me if Peanut is really a Leafs fan, or is this the longest-running schtick on HB?

Good Morning gentlemen! How you guys feeling about tonight's match up?

what's sielski's rep in the Philly media?
- mr.peanut

snarky weasel that tries too hard to be funny and hip

Wow, you don't hear that much on Hockeybuzz, or the internet at all for that matter; thanks.

At least tell me who trolls you guys all the time... is it French? RogerRoeper?

and can someone tell me if Peanut is really a Leafs fan, or is this the longest-running schtick on HB?
- Aetherial

His whole life is a lie...

snarky weasel that tries too hard to be funny and hip
- KINGKENZO

basically a philly doubledown

basically a philly doubledown
- mr.peanut

he was just on 590 and said he's a he's a true Torontonian at heart

he was just on 590 and said he's a he's a true Torontonian at heart
- KINGKENZO

he's an ethnic minority who likes the raptors more than any hockey team?