Wanna blog? Start your own hockey blog with My HockeyBuzz. Register for free today!
 
Forums :: Blog World :: Bill Meltzer: Quick Hits: Voorhees Arrivals, WJC, Alumni 12 Days, TIFH and More
Author Message
MJL
Philadelphia Flyers
Location: Candyland, PA
Joined: 09.20.2007

Dec 18 @ 10:27 AM ET
It went directly to the islanders, it was a horrible play. If he had put it in the corner there was a chance for us to come up with the puck. Not watching the entire shift you can’t know what happened why there was no forward support on that side but regardless he threw the puck blindly to the other team and it led directly to a scoring chance for the opposition.
- ClaudeFather


He would've been blindly throwing the puck to the corner also. You don't know what would've happened after that. We disagree on this play. He cleared the puck out of the danger zone. The safest area on the ice inside the defensive end of the ice is the furthest point away from the net.

Explain to me what Scott Laughton was doing on that play?
ClaudeFather
Philadelphia Flyers
Location: west haven, CT
Joined: 08.14.2015

Dec 18 @ 10:38 AM ET
He would've been blindly throwing the puck to the corner also. You don't know what would've happened after that. We disagree on this play. He cleared the puck out of the danger zone. The safest area on the ice inside the defensive end of the ice is the furthest point away from the net.

Explain to me what Scott Laughton was doing on that play?

- MJL

Haha flying the zone for no reason at all. It was a bad play by ghost though. Even the cut to the middle initially.
MJL
Philadelphia Flyers
Location: Candyland, PA
Joined: 09.20.2007

Dec 18 @ 10:39 AM ET
Haha flying the zone for no reason at all. It was a bad play by ghost though. Even the cut to the middle initially.
- ClaudeFather


When Scott Laughton re-entered the zone, at what position on the ice did he take up?
ClaudeFather
Philadelphia Flyers
Location: west haven, CT
Joined: 08.14.2015

Dec 18 @ 10:48 AM ET
When Scott Laughton re-entered the zone, at what position on the ice did he take up?
- MJL

His vacated point, watching it again I have more issue with the cut to the middle by ghost rather than the chip up the boards. I watched it once and made the comment. The cut to the middle was bad, he should have chipped it to the other side behind the net. Scott Laughton did not help the situation at all flying the zone
MJL
Philadelphia Flyers
Location: Candyland, PA
Joined: 09.20.2007

Dec 18 @ 10:55 AM ET
His vacated point, watching it again I have more issue with the cut to the middle by ghost rather than the chip up the boards. I watched it once and made the comment. The cut to the middle was bad, he should have chipped it to the other side behind the net. Scott Laughton did not help the situation at all flying the zone
- ClaudeFather


I don't disagree that a rim was an option but that was also putting the puck in the same spot. I'm going to educate you here on NHL forechecks and options to beat them. The angle that the Isles players take behind the net on the puck is not an accident. They're looking to take away the walls and rim plays. The play Gostisbehere attempts to make, cutting out in front of the net is a high risk play. However making high risk plays is how you beat NHL forechecks and transition the other way. Those are the plays that good players and good teams make. I intentionally led you to the point where you finally saw what you were missing. Recall that I said that forward support was the issue. When Gostisbehere cuts into the middle and chips to the point, if Laughton was playing his position properly and didn't leave the zone as quickly, he would've been in prefect position to, depending on if the Isle D pinches, either skate it out in transition, or a simple chip out of the zone. Play over. Gostisbehere beat the forecheck.
ClaudeFather
Philadelphia Flyers
Location: west haven, CT
Joined: 08.14.2015

Dec 18 @ 12:21 PM ET
I don't disagree that a rim was an option but that was also putting the puck in the same spot. I'm going to educate you here on NHL forechecks and options to beat them. The angle that the Isles players take behind the net on the puck is not an accident. They're looking to take away the walls and rim plays. The play Gostisbehere attempts to make, cutting out in front of the net is a high risk play. However making high risk plays is how you beat NHL forechecks and transition the other way. Those are the plays that good players and good teams make. I intentionally led you to the point where you finally saw what you were missing. Recall that I said that forward support was the issue. When Gostisbehere cuts into the middle and chips to the point, if Laughton was playing his position properly and didn't leave the zone as quickly, he would've been in prefect position to, depending on if the Isle D pinches, either skate it out in transition, or a simple chip out of the zone. Play over. Gostisbehere beat the forecheck.
- MJL

I see what you’re saying , good point. I do feel he did not exactly cleanly beat the forecheck he got immediately pressured in the middle of the zone but if Laughton is there it’s most likely an odd man rush for us.
MJL
Philadelphia Flyers
Location: Candyland, PA
Joined: 09.20.2007

Dec 18 @ 12:44 PM ET
I see what you’re saying , good point. I do feel he did not exactly cleanly beat the forecheck he got immediately pressured in the middle of the zone but if Laughton is there it’s most likely an odd man rush for us.
- ClaudeFather


Of course he was immediately pressured. That's the point of the Ilse forecheck scheme. To force you to the middle, to the dangerous area of the ice.
Page: Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5