TheSabresTaco
Buffalo Sabres |
|
|
Location: For me. jack Eichel is bobby ryan….that's it. - Octavarium, NY Joined: 05.05.2011
|
|
|
Hope whoever had the choice of Mahomes/Rodgers listened and went with Rodgers - SDSabre
A-ARon.
Thank me tomorrow. - TheSabresTaco
|
|
TheSabresTaco
Buffalo Sabres |
|
|
Location: For me. jack Eichel is bobby ryan….that's it. - Octavarium, NY Joined: 05.05.2011
|
|
|
Makes sense. Sign your best players first. - Boss34
Some disagree that VO is better than Sam
|
|
SABRES 89
Season Ticket Holder Buffalo Sabres |
|
|
Location: I'm very Happy to be here. Las Vegas Via Buffalo N.Y. Joined: 02.17.2007
|
|
|
Trade him - GERBE!!!75PTS
Jesus Christ do you ever stop with the trade Reinhart crap, all day every day. STFU already. |
|
SDSabre
Buffalo Sabres |
|
|
Joined: 02.05.2014
|
|
|
- TheSabresTaco
Falcons are down 5 DBs. Belichick always seems to neutralize the other teams best players. It was nothing against Mahomes, normal week him for sure. |
|
SDSabre
Buffalo Sabres |
|
|
Joined: 02.05.2014
|
|
|
- TheSabresTaco
Same yard total as Mahomes for the entire game in the first half, with an extra TD. When you know you know |
|
sbroads24
Buffalo Sabres |
|
Location: We are in 30th place. It's 2017 , NY Joined: 02.12.2012
|
|
|
Some disagree that VO is better than Sam - TheSabresTaco
What confuses me is the people who dislike Sam, dislike him because he’s soft, isn’t fast, isn’t big or physical......but like Olofsson? |
|
Boss34
Buffalo Sabres |
|
Location: BUFFALO , NY Joined: 12.03.2015
|
|
|
Some disagree that VO is better than Sam - TheSabresTaco
And that's ok.
Price per point, I think your getting much better value with olloffson. Probably 1 or 2 million less a year for similar point totals. |
|
TheSabresTaco
Buffalo Sabres |
|
|
Location: For me. jack Eichel is bobby ryan….that's it. - Octavarium, NY Joined: 05.05.2011
|
|
|
What confuses me is the people who dislike Sam, dislike him because he’s soft, isn’t fast, isn’t big or physical......but like Olofsson? - sbroads24
I thought it, but I didn't say it.
|
|
SDSabre
Buffalo Sabres |
|
|
Joined: 02.05.2014
|
|
|
What confuses me is the people who dislike Sam, dislike him because he’s soft, isn’t fast, isn’t big or physical......but like Olofsson? - sbroads24
Shiny new toy + 7th Cinderella pick. |
|
Boss34
Buffalo Sabres |
|
Location: BUFFALO , NY Joined: 12.03.2015
|
|
|
What confuses me is the people who dislike Sam, dislike him because he’s soft, isn’t fast, isn’t big or physical......but like Olofsson? - sbroads24
You could refer to me by name 😐
I like his shot. Sam lacks a scorers touch around the net.
Eichel needs shooters. |
|
TheSabresTaco
Buffalo Sabres |
|
|
Location: For me. jack Eichel is bobby ryan….that's it. - Octavarium, NY Joined: 05.05.2011
|
|
|
And that's ok.
Price per point, I think your getting much better value with olloffson. Probably 1 or 2 million less a year for similar point totals. - Boss34
Might as well go back to battling about politics, because we will nevery ever-y settle on that debate.
A data based theory could be produced to kinda answer, who is the more valuable player per dollar. Need access to evolvinghockey or sean tierney's site to compile that argument. |
|
Boss34
Buffalo Sabres |
|
Location: BUFFALO , NY Joined: 12.03.2015
|
|
|
I thought it, but I didn't say it. - TheSabresTaco
Being that sam and olo are the same age, who has more room to grow? The rookie or the high end draft pick?
What point totals do you predict next year out of them? |
|
ImThatGuy
Buffalo Sabres |
|
|
Location: I AM MY OWN DAMN SOURCE!, NY Joined: 11.04.2010
|
|
|
You could refer to me by name 😐
I like his shot. Sam lacks a scorers touch around the net.
Eichel needs shooters. - Boss34
VO can’t get his shot off 5v5 so it almost becomes useless.
Unless he gets better at finding spots he’s going to be a PP specialist.
Reinhart is a 20/40+ minute player. He also sets up Eichel. They work well together.
Sam at 7 mil getting 60-70 points a season is damn fine by me. |
|
ImThatGuy
Buffalo Sabres |
|
|
Location: I AM MY OWN DAMN SOURCE!, NY Joined: 11.04.2010
|
|
|
Being that sam and olo are the same age, who has more room to grow? The rookie or the high end draft pick?
What point totals do you predict next year out of them? - Boss34
Sam 60-70
VO 35-45 |
|
Boss34
Buffalo Sabres |
|
Location: BUFFALO , NY Joined: 12.03.2015
|
|
|
Might as well go back to battling about politics, because we will nevery ever-y settle on that debate.
A data based theory could be produced to kinda answer, who is the more valuable player per dollar. Need access to evolvinghockey or sean tierney's site to compile that argument. - TheSabresTaco
I thought my question was "off the record " . My apologies. |
|
ImThatGuy
Buffalo Sabres |
|
|
Location: I AM MY OWN DAMN SOURCE!, NY Joined: 11.04.2010
|
|
|
You could refer to me by name 😐
I like his shot. Sam lacks a scorers touch around the net.
Eichel needs shooters. - Boss34
Also you do realize Reinhart plays the net front presence on the PP and is banging in rebounds quite a bit right? |
|
|
|
What confuses me is the people who dislike Sam, dislike him because he’s soft, isn’t fast, isn’t big or physical......but like Olofsson? - sbroads24
VO skates pretty well and I called him a 2nd line player today the Sabres got him in the 7th round where draft picks go to die.
The Sabres got Sam at #2 overall where draft picks go to thrive, become franchise players, all-stars, HOFers perhaps, get out in their community and go to children's hospitals
Being a realist is liberating some of you should try it. |
|
Boss34
Buffalo Sabres |
|
Location: BUFFALO , NY Joined: 12.03.2015
|
|
|
Sam 60-70
VO 35-45 - ImThatGuy
Fair enough
They will probably be paid 100,000 per point with your ratio.
I thought olloffson looked much better late in the season 5 x 5. Not sure if anyone has any stats.
Didnt everyone suck 5 x 5 ? How do sam and olo compare? |
|
sbroads24
Buffalo Sabres |
|
Location: We are in 30th place. It's 2017 , NY Joined: 02.12.2012
|
|
|
You could refer to me by name 😐
I like his shot. Sam lacks a scorers touch around the net.
Eichel needs shooters. - Boss34
aint just you |
|
|
|
By the way, this isn't going to sit well with the true homers here but Reinhart AND Skinner as your top two wingers will lead this team to nowhere.
Realism is a powerful thing. |
|
Boss34
Buffalo Sabres |
|
Location: BUFFALO , NY Joined: 12.03.2015
|
|
|
Also you do realize Reinhart plays the net front presence on the PP and is banging in rebounds quite a bit right? - ImThatGuy
Um , quite a bit ? Really.
I watch him play next the goalies right side. Along the side of the net. Occasionally he drifts in front and has some decent tip goals.
It's funny how people watch 2 different games |
|
sbroads24
Buffalo Sabres |
|
Location: We are in 30th place. It's 2017 , NY Joined: 02.12.2012
|
|
|
By the way, this isn't going to sit well with the true homers here but Reinhart AND Skinner as your top two wingers will lead this team to nowhere.
Realism is a powerful thing. - GilPerreault11
Who were St. Louis’s two best wingers last year? Tarasenko was out.
Are you going to convince me Jaden Schwartz and David Perron are better than Skinner and Reinhart? |
|
Boss34
Buffalo Sabres |
|
Location: BUFFALO , NY Joined: 12.03.2015
|
|
|
aint just you - sbroads24
Yeah, me and the other posters that know hockey 😉 |
|
|
|
Also you do realize Reinhart plays the net front presence on the PP and is banging in rebounds quite a bit right? - ImThatGuy
Thanks for bringing that up. I'd love to know how many of Sam's goals were the exquisite tip-ins. I know, all goals count but damn Risto can stand in front of the net and if he had the same hand-eye coordination you would all love him too. |
|
Boss34
Buffalo Sabres |
|
Location: BUFFALO , NY Joined: 12.03.2015
|
|
|
Who were St. Louis’s two best wingers last year? Tarasenko was out.
Are you going to convince me Jaden Schwartz and David Perron are better than Skinner and Reinhart? - sbroads24
I had a hard time convincing you that ror wasn't just a "fine" or " decent" player ☝️ |
|
Page: Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109 Next |