Well you got all those white folks upset when NFL players were peacefully protesting. I guess people should just shut up and look the other way.
- Mentalorgasm5

Weren’t you wishing people to die of covid 19 last week? That’s not important anymore to brainwashed liberals like you though. Keep looting though 😂

Well one poster here believes that black people are literally sub-human and he's halfway convinced at least one more
- jcragcrumple

Oof. That's quite a leap

Yea cause that's totally what I said. Typical SJW triggered and sperging out. I thought you'd be okay by now, little guy..? Everything nice and warm in your safe space? Rocking out to Shiny Happy People? Or all you all hot and bothered & ready for a rough pegging session?
- BareMetal

Man, I don't know your guys' history with eachother, but you're both damn quick to condemn and assume the worst possible thing of one another. Wildly unproductive, at best.

12 times he was under review.
- dadeadhead

Not exactly.

AMENDMENT I
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."

An employer can limit what a person says or does.
- adambuffalo

nonetheless his right to do it is there, countless morons on here talking about how they should leave the country since they were protesting. That has nothing to do with the private sector.

He doesnt have a job in the NFL, which is unrelated to my point.

Weren’t you wishing people to die of covid 19 last week? That’s not important anymore to brainwashed liberals like you though. Keep looting though 😂
- Alex the Great

And this moron here, you have no idea who I am, and my political affiliation. You are one dense individual.

He is right. Not sure why people want to dispute facts in here. I know some people want to create a narrative to make themselves feel better but facts are facts
- Fattony1187

No poop. However, there are many more white America, the ratio should be even, its not- 1/9 is far greater than 1/19.

Comparing totals among populations that have a huge difference in numbers is a very easy way to manipulate the numbers. AKA spinning your misleading narrative. But its okay, I am sure you feel better about those facts.

This is genetically, biologically, anthropologically proven to be false. The Out of Africa theory has been completely debunked.
- BareMetal

To go back to this, the one paper you later cite detail the following as their conclusions (in the abstract):

"This study shows that the Out-of-Africa hypothesis has not been adequately substantiated. The common assertion that "anatomically modern hu-mans came out of Africa some 70,000 years ago" has never been convincingly calculated or determined otherwise; our research suggests that it is incorrect."

Which certainly doesn't support a full-out debunking. Further, I see no evident consensus among the geneticist community about this. I'll concede I may not have looked in enough detail yet, but these are a few quotes from things I've found regarding the debate surrounding the matter:

"(just a general description of the two "competing" theories) Broadly speaking, there are two competing hypotheses on the origin of modern humans: the Out-of-Africa hypothesis and the multiregional hypothesis. Both agree that Homo erectus originated in Africa and expanded to Eurasia about one million years ago, but they differ in explaining the origin of modern humans (Homo sapiens sapiens). The first hypothesis proposes that a second migration out of Africa happened about 100,000 years ago, in which anatomically modern humans of African origin conquered the world by completely replacing archaic human populations (Homo sapiens; Model A). The multiregional hypothesis states that independent multiple origins (Model D) or shared multiregional evolution with continuous gene flow between continental populations (Model C) occurred in the million years since Homo erectus came out of Africa (the trellis theory). A compromised version of the Out-of-Africa hypothesis emphasizes the African origin of most human populations but allows for the possibility of minor local contributions (Model B)." https://www.nature.com/sc...regional-hypothesis-6391/

" ‘Modernity’ was not a package that had a single African origin in one time, place, and population, but was a composite whose elements appeared, and sometimes disappeared,at different times and places and then coalesced to assume the form we see in extant humans [6] . However, during the past 400 000 years, most of that assembly took place in Africa, which is why a recent African origin still represents the predominant (but not exclusive) mode of evolution for H.sapiens. Rather than saying ‘we are all multiregionalists trying to explain the out-of-Africa pattern’ [1] , it would be more appropriate to say ‘we are all out-of-Africanists who accept some multiregional contributions’." https://reader.elsevier.c...CD57678CF065BA4EFFE671A2D

"(in response to the claims made by Multiregional Theory proponents regarding something far too complex for my knowledge on the matter to summarize) However, "Out of Africa" Theory proponents also explain this with the fact that genetic changes occur on a regional basis rather than a continental basis, and populations close to each other are likely to share certain specific regional SNPs while sharing most other genes in common." An excerpt from a Wikipedia page https://en.wikipedia.org/...l_origin_of_modern_humans

This isn't too assert that Multi-regional Theory is wrong or Out of Africa theory is right. As I've established, I'm not even remotely trained in this field. However, it seems like a cursory Google search raises points of contention to your claim of OoA being "completely debunked".

That's what I (frank)ing thought.

You couldn't prove your racist, half-baked, scientifically illiterate ramblings.

Take a seat.

You're the worst kind of conspiratorial contrarian

Also, I'm a registered libertarian for whatever the (frank) it's worth
- jcragcrumple

lol okay dude.. I literally presented you with facts and you outright reject it. You deny reality, and not only that, it's racist, of course. I say "we're different, here's how," and you retort with "this means blacks are sub-human." So how am I the racist, exactly?

You've got it all worked out in that little box of yours.

Oof. That's quite a leap
- MaximumBone

Case in point

lol okay dude.. I literally presented you with facts and you outright reject it. You deny reality, and not only that, it's racist, of course. I say "we're different, here's how" and you retort with "this means blacks are sub-human." So how am I the racist, exactly?

You've got it all worked out in that little box of yours.
- BareMetal

Still waiting for your studies proving black people are a different species you absolute moron. You're the Charles Darwin of our age with these revolutionary thoughts

What a brilliant contrarian thought experiment. It must go over like gangbusters on the alt-right forums

To go back to this, the one paper you later cite detail the following as their conclusions (in the abstract):

"This study shows that the Out-of-Africa hypothesis has not been adequately substantiated. The common assertion that "anatomically modern hu-mans came out of Africa some 70,000 years ago" has never been convincingly calculated or determined otherwise; our research suggests that it is incorrect."

Which certainly doesn't support a full-out debunking. Further, I see no evident consensus among the geneticist community about this. I'll concede I may not have looked in enough detail yet, but these are a few quotes from things I've found regarding the debate surrounding the matter:

"(just a general description of the two "competing" theories) Broadly speaking, there are two competing hypotheses on the origin of modern humans: the Out-of-Africa hypothesis and the multiregional hypothesis. Both agree that Homo erectus originated in Africa and expanded to Eurasia about one million years ago, but they differ in explaining the origin of modern humans (Homo sapiens sapiens). The first hypothesis proposes that a second migration out of Africa happened about 100,000 years ago, in which anatomically modern humans of African origin conquered the world by completely replacing archaic human populations (Homo sapiens; Model A). The multiregional hypothesis states that independent multiple origins (Model D) or shared multiregional evolution with continuous gene flow between continental populations (Model C) occurred in the million years since Homo erectus came out of Africa (the trellis theory). A compromised version of the Out-of-Africa hypothesis emphasizes the African origin of most human populations but allows for the possibility of minor local contributions (Model B)." https://www.nature.com/sc...regional-hypothesis-6391/

" ‘Modernity’ was not a package that had a single African origin in one time, place, and population, but was a composite whose elements appeared, and sometimes disappeared,at different times and places and then coalesced to assume the form we see in extant humans
- MaximumBone[6] . However, during the past 400 000 years, most of that assembly took place in Africa, which is why a recent African origin still represents the predominant (but not exclusive) mode of evolution for H.sapiens. Rather than saying ‘we are all multiregionalists trying to explain the out-of-Africa pattern’ [1] , it would be more appropriate to say ‘we are all out-of-Africanists who accept some multiregional contributions’." https://reader.elsevier.c...CD57678CF065BA4EFFE671A2D

"(in response to the claims made by Multiregional Theory proponents regarding something far too complex for my knowledge on the matter to summarize) However, "Out of Africa" Theory proponents also explain this with the fact that genetic changes occur on a regional basis rather than a continental basis, and populations close to each other are likely to share certain specific regional SNPs while sharing most other genes in common." An excerpt from a Wikipedia page https://en.wikipedia.org/...l_origin_of_modern_humans

This isn't too assert that Multi-regional Theory is wrong or Out of Africa theory is right. As I've established, I'm not even remotely trained in this field. However, it seems like a cursory Google search raises points of contention to your claim of OoA being "completely debunked".

Thanks for actually reading; but in favor of just putting this to bed, I'm going to leave with this.. this guy is an amazing anthropologist.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nxCjqD5HSUM

Trigger warning for Jcrag

Ahhhh politicsbuzz here today

Thanks for actually reading; but in favor of just putting this to bed, I'm going to leave with this.. this guy is an amazing anthropologist.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nxCjqD5HSUM

Trigger warning for Jcrag
- BareMetal

Maybe tomorrow someone will publish a paper saying that black people are a different species

Until then, that Goebbels biography won't read itself. Get to it.

Still waiting for your studies proving black people are a different species you absolute moron. You're the Charles Darwin of our age with these revolutionary thoughts

What a brilliant contrarian thought experiment. It must go over like gangbusters on the alt-right forums
- jcragcrumple

Like I said however many posts ago - call it what you want, I don't care.

Joe Biden said today

“If someone runs at a cop with a knife we need to train cops them to shoot them in leg instead of the chest.”

Wow. Wants cops to die and knows nothing about firearms. Who the frank is voting for this guy.

I can't with the different species bull poop has to be the dumbest thing I've ever heard in my life

Joe Biden said today

“If someone runs at a cop with a knife we need to train cops them to shoot them in leg instead of the chest.”

Wow. Wants cops to die and knows nothing about firearms. Who the frank is voting for this guy.
- Fattony1187

Me ... its saving life's so you would rather kill them ? police should have the ability
To do that without killing someone if not then find another job

Me ... its saving life's so you would rather kill them ? police should have the ability
To do that without killing someone if not then find another job
- gerbe75pts

Clueless.

Clueless.
- Fattony1187

How? You guys should be able to handle a person with a knife you are trained to take out terrorist
You should be able to shoot someone so they are disarmed or fight some one

How? You guys should be able to handle a person with a knife you are trained to take out terrorist
You should be able to shoot someone so they are disarmed or fight some one
- gerbe75pts

Clueless

I can't with the different species bull poop has to be the dumbest thing I've ever heard in my life
- gerbe75pts

Flat earth.......

That one has been debunked on record since at least 1492.......

What’s goin on in Buffalo? Car drove through a group of police?

Holy (frank)