Nope.

Nor Beeves and Butthead also..
- pete26

and also yes, much more quality content, so I'm pretty happy if podcasts are doing so well
- Pat1993

If you want to survive doing a podcast, you actually have to be good. If you want to survive as a radio personality just don't swear and be happy making 25k a year

Your boat?

https://twitter.com/prade.../1263658422227963905?s=20
- AGalchenyuk27

That’s a great boat!

If you want to survive doing a podcast, you actually have to be good. If you want to survive as a radio personality just don't swear and be happy making 25k a year
- mr.peanut

as long as the ads and commercial incentives don't directly affect the quality... I've noticed a few podcasts with very intrusive ads, which is counterintuitive to what a podcast is supposed to be

farmers..?
- Pat1993

They are called cows. Never heard a beef moo

as long as the ads and commercial incentives don't directly affect the quality... I've noticed a few podcasts with very intrusive ads, which is counterintuitive to what a podcast is supposed to be
- Pat1993

Big time. I listen to one where the integration is terrible and another one where they make it part of the show (if you want someone to break in to your house and chop your head off, fine, don't buy simplisafe. Fot those who don't want to be decapitated...)

They are called cows. Never heard a beef moo
- Gramps28

It was actually the Norman-French invasion that brought the modern word beef into our language, as the older French term boef, which had derived from the Latin bubula. Although the word cou stuck around to refer to live animals, the term beef became firmly established to refer to the meat. There are, of course, more details to this story, but let’s move on to the plural.

According to the Oxford English Dictionary:
Plural of Beef
beef: n. 1. the flesh of a cow, bull, or ox, used as food. (plural beeves /bēvz/) Farming A cow, bull, or ox fattened for its meat.

In early Latin, the actual animals that bobula came from were called bovus, which could mean anything to do with cows or oxen. Our modern word bovine comes from this source. The question is if cow (or bull/oxen) was used to refer to the actual animal, and beef referred to its meat, how could there be a plural? Today we use meat as a mass noun. Think of meat, then, as similar to a word like concrete or wood. These items exist as undifferentiated wholes which cannot be separated and counted. There are no concretes. Meat is similar. Only occasionally do we break this rule and use a plural form of meat to refer to a group of more than one type or variety meats. Even then, we are just as like to use a phrase such as “several varieties of meat were on display.”

Beef would seem to be similar to meat, in this regard. Well, it turns out that there was a time when a cow that was ready to slaughter, meaning it had been fattened up and readied for market, was then referred to as a beef. Likewise, the slaughtered carcass might be called a beef. And two or more market-ready cows, or carcasses, were beeves.

In case you’re wondering, if you have a beef with more than one person, the plural is beefs!

Big time. I listen to one where the integration is terrible and another one where they make it part of the show (if you want someone to break in to your house and chop your head off, fine, don't buy simplisafe. Fot those who don't want to be decapitated...)
- mr.peanut

jesus



I don't mind how joe rogan or bill burr do it... but podcasts like Ron Burgundy, which you would think would just be silliness, is actually around (frank)ing 50% ads... and not even very funny lol

jesus



I don't mind how joe rogan or bill burr do it... but podcasts like Ron Burgundy, which you would think would just be silliness, is actually around (frank)ing 50% ads... and not even very funny lol
- Pat1993

That Ron burgundy character is so played. I remember hearing someone playing a clip and it sounded like someone acting like will ferral trying to play ron

That Ron burgundy character is so played. I remember hearing someone playing a clip and it sounded like someone acting like will ferral trying to play ron
- mr.peanut

well... it is Will Ferrell acting as Ron Burgundy...

well... it is Will Ferrell acting as Ron Burgundy...
- Pat1993

The point is he didn't sound like Ron burgundy. It sounded like a poor impersonation

The point is he didn't sound like Ron burgundy. It sounded like a poor impersonation
- mr.peanut

ahh, I see lol... I've listened to a few and I find it sounds exactly like him, just not very funny

It was actually the Norman-French invasion that brought the modern word beef into our language, as the older French term boef, which had derived from the Latin bubula. Although the word cou stuck around to refer to live animals, the term beef became firmly established to refer to the meat. There are, of course, more details to this story, but let’s move on to the plural.

According to the Oxford English Dictionary:
Plural of Beef
beef: n. 1. the flesh of a cow, bull, or ox, used as food. (plural beeves /bēvz/) Farming A cow, bull, or ox fattened for its meat.

In early Latin, the actual animals that bobula came from were called bovus, which could mean anything to do with cows or oxen. Our modern word bovine comes from this source. The question is if cow (or bull/oxen) was used to refer to the actual animal, and beef referred to its meat, how could there be a plural? Today we use meat as a mass noun. Think of meat, then, as similar to a word like concrete or wood. These items exist as undifferentiated wholes which cannot be separated and counted. There are no concretes. Meat is similar. Only occasionally do we break this rule and use a plural form of meat to refer to a group of more than one type or variety meats. Even then, we are just as like to use a phrase such as “several varieties of meat were on display.”

Beef would seem to be similar to meat, in this regard. Well, it turns out that there was a time when a cow that was ready to slaughter, meaning it had been fattened up and readied for market, was then referred to as a beef. Likewise, the slaughtered carcass might be called a beef. And two or more market-ready cows, or carcasses, were beeves.

In case you’re wondering, if you have a beef with more than one person, the plural is beefs!
- Pat1993

yeah, cows. no one says..oh look at the herd of beef. unless they have the munchies.

ahh, I see lol... I've listened to a few and I find it sounds exactly like him, just not very funny
- Pat1993

that's because will ferrel is not funny.

yeah, cows. no one says..oh look at the herd of beef. unless they have the munchies.
- Gramps28

Yeah "herd of beef" is not acceptable nomenclature in English.

"Herd of Beefeaters"...



OK, still not quite right, but as you see above, it's real.

Now a "herd of Beefeater gin bottles"...



Nothing wrong with that at all

deadpoulet and adam french. Quite the combo
- mr.peanut

I flagged this.

where's my money for my podcast?

the (frank) needs a plural for beef?
- Gramps28

Hi welcome to Arbys

Hi, can I get 5 beef n cheddar roast beeves please?

I flagged this.
- deadpoulet

Too hot for HB

Yeah "herd of beef" is not acceptable nomenclature in English.

"Herd of Beefeaters"...



OK, still not quite right, but as you see above, it's real.

Now a "herd of Beefeater gin bottles"...



Nothing wrong with that at all
- Bendecko

didn't even realize those guys with the little hats are actually called Beefeaters lol

didn't even realize those guys with the little hats are actually called Beefeaters lol
- Pat1993

they are?

they are?
- deadpoulet

well I think the correct appellation is "Yeomen Warders"


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yeomen_Warders

so the players are voting tonight for the playoff format, how exciting...!!

so the players are voting tonight for the playoff format, how exciting...!!
- Pat1993

I just came....