The blog is old now

Can say that for 98% of the wingers in the NHL.

That’s my point.

In a league that has a hard salary cap, we could or went with wingers that had less talent with Skinner if it meant shoring up the other positions on the team.

Like a goalie that could stop a beachball for example.

Or a 2C and a 3C.

Johan Larsson was our 2nd most important forward this year in terms of “team” success.
- Pegullaville

Name the premier wingers in the league and tell me their centers.

I mentioned it before and would like to revisit the idea of trading for Victor Rask. He played his best hockey in Carolina with Skinner and hasn't done anything in Minnesota. Skinner produced with him as well.

The Wild are pretty thin at LD, so maybe a Rask for McCabe deal would work. Add a low pick if needed.

Sorry for the length of this post.

Hopefully most will find it worth the read...

I mentioned yesterday that several weeks ago I analyzed the Roster and Cap hits of 10 Teams, in an effort to get a decent sample size of the league and be able to create breakdown of Cap hits by position.

Since there were 1/3 of the teams, some players Caps were obviously not included...hence why you may think of a player and challenge the figures for a certain position.

The 10 teams I selected were as follows:
Boston, Tampa, Washington, Pittsburgh, St Louis, NY Isles, Winnipeg, Nashville, Chicago, San Jose.
I selected teams that were successful and had relatively mature rosters with some higher-priced talent. Only 10 because it is friggin' time-consuming.

1st, I wanted to use the Sabres Cap situation as the baseline for the following to compute how much is available in Cap for their Contracts, but accounted for other commitments such as Buyouts, Bonuses, and hold-over to enable flexibility, so I used:
-Cap ceiling $81,500,000
-Buyouts (Hodgson) $900,000
-2019-2010 Bonus rollover $3,000,000
-2020-2021 Bonuses $3,000,000
That left $74,600,000 available to spend and bank a holdover...so maybe $73,000,000 for AVV only, would still be tight.

Here's what the analysis of those 10 teams showed:
Forwards:
.............LW.......................C......................RW
Line 1.. 6.9% ($5.7m)... 8.0% ($6.5m)... 6.5% ($5.3m)
Line 2. 4.3% ($3.5m)... 7.5% ($6.1m)... 6.0% ($4.9m)
Line 3. 3.0% ($2.5m)... 3.5% ($2.9m)... 2.7% ($2.2m)
Line 4. 2.1% ($1.7m)... 2.0% ($1,6m)... 2.5% ($2.0m)
13th F... 1.1% ($0.9m)

Defense/Goalie:
.........................LhD......................RhD.......................G
1st Pair. 5.8% ($4.7m).... 5.7% ($4.8m).... 6.2% ($5.1m)
2nd Pair. 4.3% ($3.5m).... 4.9% ($4.0m).... 2.1% ($1.7m)
3rd Pair. 2.2% ($1.8m).... 2.0% ($2.4m)....
7th D. 1.2% ($0.95m).


The above percentages total 91.1% which gets me to $74.2m...about $1.2M over the target of $73.0m identified above...pretty close...but some "savings" would be necessary to get that Hold-back up to just $1.6m (which isn't a lot of flexibility).
But it could serve as a rough "blueprint"

If you use this as a guide going forward, and plug in existing Sabres contract commitments like
-Jack @ $10M
-Skinner @ $9M
-Okposo @ $6M
that is already $10M over the blueprint.

Hence why I continually look for opportunities for cheaper players at certain positions like Larsson, Girgs, Mojo, Risto, Montour, Miller, Rhino...
Yup, $500k or $1.0M per player matters

he said it in many interviews before the draft and was playing #1 rd at the time overseas
- homiedclown

Not true
He play way more LD

He said he was fine playing the right side,
not that he “preferred” it

Not true
He play way more LD

He said he was fine playing the right side,
not that he “preferred” it
- jdfitz77

whatever

Good old Sarah Horseface Parker.
- dadeadhead

Seems to be I’m not the only one who thinks she’s got those Kentucky derby looks!