|
|
50% of 1st round picks play 300 NHL games.
25% of 2nd round picks play 300 NHL games.
8% of players drafted after the 2nd round play 300 NHL games.
Going to take a while to see if today's trades impact the rebuild. |
|
BGKarras
Chicago Blackhawks |
|
|
Location: Itasca, IL Joined: 06.19.2012
|
|
|
Gustafsson is awful, and has always been an awful defender. Save for his 1 outlier year last season, he's basically an AHL player. He'll probably ask for $4M or more as a FA.
Getting anything for 'ole #56 is a plus.
Lehner cost you no picks or prospects to get. Based on the fact that they moved him, it's pretty clear that Stan and Lehner were not in the same ballpark on an extension.
Getting something (3 somethings?) for something for which you paid nothing is a plus in my book.
Stan has some work to do in the off season, again. But this trade deadline is far from bad. Bad would be still having Lehner & Gustafsson on the roster after 3 PM EDT today. - scottak
Well said everyone complaining should take a deep breath |
|
TommyHawk
Chicago Blackhawks |
|
|
Joined: 05.23.2013
|
|
|
The Canes didn't think so. - mohel
Or they did and Stan balked. We will never know. 🤔 |
|
|
|
That’s a fair interpretation.
But for a team like Carolina who is top-10 in GA, #1 in SA, and lost their best offensive d-man and will be without him long-term, might Gus have made more sense to them?
We can do this all day long. I’m not here to pick fights. I’m just under the impression that Stan overplayed his hand, that’s all. - TommyHawk
No you're not wrong on that. I think he was shooting too high because he thought his guys were more valuable than other teams thought they were. He waited thinking they would bite and they moved on and he had to move to his fallback trades |
|
BGKarras
Chicago Blackhawks |
|
|
Location: Itasca, IL Joined: 06.19.2012
|
|
|
I always have been, maybe you are seeing clearer now. - powerenforcer
Stop your lying |
|
MadHatter
Chicago Blackhawks |
|
Location: Woodridge, IL Joined: 07.07.2015
|
|
|
Scoring D is not that big of a deal if you have forwards who can score and forecheck. But since they have not mastered holding on to the puck yet, let alone scoring, you may have a point at least for the short term.
I still think losing Gus was a net win even with nothing in return. I saw at least three games he lost for them all by himself. - Return of the Roar
addition by subtraction |
|
Hawkster
Chicago Blackhawks |
|
|
Location: Quebec , QC Joined: 06.13.2008
|
|
|
50% of 1st round picks play 300 NHL games.
25% of 2nd round picks play 300 NHL games.
8% of players drafted after the 2nd round play 300 NHL games.
Going to take a while to see if today's trades impact the rebuild. - stevefrmglencoe
There's a rebuild? |
|
squishy24
Chicago Blackhawks |
|
Joined: 11.08.2019
|
|
|
wait, we got a 3rd for Gust? that's sweet |
|
mohel
Chicago Blackhawks |
|
|
Location: IL Joined: 02.08.2013
|
|
|
Or they did and Stan balked. We will never know. 🤔 - TommyHawk
Alrighty then. |
|
TommyHawk
Chicago Blackhawks |
|
|
Joined: 05.23.2013
|
|
|
No you're not wrong on that. I think he was shooting too high because he thought his guys were more valuable than other teams thought they were. He waited thinking they would bite and they moved on and he had to move to his fallback trades - Savetheembers33
Exactly. And that’s my belief too.
Per usual, he thought his guys were more valuable than they really were. That’s why he often re-acquires his own players - more value in his eyes to the team than others.
Wouldn’t surprise me in the slightest if a second was on the table as early as Friday, but Stan held Gus out, holding for more - and waited, waited, and waited before having to accept a third. |
|
|
|
Wait ... so ... Shalunov wasn't traded? |
|
mohel
Chicago Blackhawks |
|
|
Location: IL Joined: 02.08.2013
|
|
|
wait, we got a 3rd for Gust? that's sweet - squishy24
Stan coulda had way more, but he effed it up! |
|
StLBravesFan
Season Ticket Holder Chicago Blackhawks |
|
|
Location: IL Joined: 07.03.2011
|
|
|
This is Gustafsson's record prior to last season:
2011-12 Sweden 41 games 3+4=7
2012-13 Sweden 49 games 7+16=23
2013-14 Sweden 50 games 2+18=20
2014-15 Sweden 55 games 4+25=29
2017-18 Rockford 25 games 3+14+17
His Chicago stats were similar - 4 seasons - until last season - never double-digits in goals, never more than 1 goal every 7 games, never better than 1 point every 2 games.
Then last season he busts out - and this season reverts to his mean. And, of course, the defensive deficiencies.
How is he worth any more than a 3rd round pick? |
|
PatShart
Chicago Blackhawks |
|
Location: Vegas, NV Joined: 06.25.2015
|
|
|
Offensively Gus is MUCH better than Sami. Defensively Sami's MUCH better than Gus. It's easier to justify paying a 2nd Rd pick for a Defensemen who...actually plays Defense instead of a Defensemen who could make some awesome plays every game...but is more than likely going to give up at least two chances every game that could cost you the game - Savetheembers33
Gus isn't "much" better offensively
Hes a career .54ppg (all 214gms at 27yrs old)
Take away the one career year of the 60pts in 79gms and hes around .41ppg. (This isnt fair to him, since he did get those points...but that year may just have been an outlier)
Vataten is at .45ppg at just over 400gms, and is pretty consistent around 35 point per year - while playing defence respectably |
|
Chunk
Chicago Blackhawks |
|
Location: Why did I move back here again?, IL Joined: 11.06.2015
|
|
|
Serious question, in reference to today, is Sami Vatanen a much better player that Gus? He was able to fetch a 2nd and a former 2nd round prospect.
He’s also an expiring contract and currently on the IR and hasn’t ever eclipsed 40 points in a season. He may be considered a “steady” #4-type of d-man, but hard to believe that he’s more valuable than Gus is (even if Gus is worse defensively). - TommyHawk
Vatanan is historically a much more reliable defenseman and those are considered a premium for the playoffs. IMO, Adventure Gus is not someone you want Qb'ing your playoff PP.
If the Canes held him in anywhere near where they viewed Vatanan, they would have put up the assets. |
|
mohel
Chicago Blackhawks |
|
|
Location: IL Joined: 02.08.2013
|
|
|
Exactly. And that’s my belief too.
Per usual, he thought his guys were more valuable than they really were. That’s why he often re-acquires his own players - more value in his eyes to the team than others.
Wouldn’t surprise me in the slightest if a second was on the table as early as Friday, but Stan held Gus out, holding for more - and waited, waited, and waited before having to accept a third. - TommyHawk
Belief based on no evidence, is my belief.
Or you overvalued Gus and don't want to admit it. |
|
z1990z
Chicago Blackhawks |
|
|
Location: NW USA Joined: 02.09.2012
|
|
|
Wait ... so ... Shalunov wasn't traded? - EbonyRaptor
To Minnesota- Shaulnov
To Chicago- Ryan Hartman.....
Done! |
|
|
|
Exactly. And that’s my belief too.
Per usual, he thought his guys were more valuable than they really were. That’s why he often re-acquires his own players - more value in his eyes to the team than others.
Wouldn’t surprise me in the slightest if a second was on the table as early as Friday, but Stan held Gus out, holding for more - and waited, waited, and waited before having to accept a third. - TommyHawk
I'm with you on that 100%.
I think they had something working with the Canes for Lehner and Gus and he kept pushing it off because he wanted either more from them or Calgary/Vegas and was waiting for one to bite. Once Carolina moved on and made their deals he lost any leverage he had and had to take what he could in his backup deals |
|
Chunk
Chicago Blackhawks |
|
Location: Why did I move back here again?, IL Joined: 11.06.2015
|
|
|
I always have been, maybe you are seeing clearer now. - powerenforcer
Touche. I could simply be a lemming flowing the whim of the majority, I won't deny that. |
|
LAHawk
Chicago Blackhawks |
|
Joined: 11.02.2017
|
|
|
That’s a fair interpretation.
But for a team like Carolina who is top-10 in GA, #1 in SA, and lost their best offensive d-man and will be without him long-term, might Gus have made more sense to them?
We can do this all day long. I’m not here to pick fights. I’m just under the impression that Stan overplayed his hand, that’s all. - TommyHawk
Would you rather have Brade Skej or Gus Carolina decided Skej?
|
|
PatShart
Chicago Blackhawks |
|
Location: Vegas, NV Joined: 06.25.2015
|
|
|
So how is it different...if Stan allegedly held out because "he thought" players were worth more, but they actually weren't..... to fans here complaining that "all he got" was a 2nd, 3rd and prospect for them?
Isnt that doing the exact same thing hes being criticized for? |
|
TommyHawk
Chicago Blackhawks |
|
|
Joined: 05.23.2013
|
|
|
I'm with you on that 100%.
I think they had something working with the Canes for Lehner and Gus and he kept pushing it off because he wanted either more from them or Calgary/Vegas and was waiting for one to bite. Once Carolina moved on and made their deals he lost any leverage he had and had to take what he could in his backup deals - Savetheembers33
Bingo. |
|
TommyHawk
Chicago Blackhawks |
|
|
Joined: 05.23.2013
|
|
|
Would you rather have Brade Skej or Gus Carolina decided Skej? - LAHawk
Irrelevant because Gus would not have fetched a first. |
|
z1990z
Chicago Blackhawks |
|
|
Location: NW USA Joined: 02.09.2012
|
|
|
So how is it different...if Stan allegedly held out because "he thought" players were worth more, but they actually weren't..... to fans here complaining that "all he got" was a 2nd, 3rd and prospect for them?
Isnt that doing the exact same thing hes being criticized for? - PatShart
Im fine with the return. The concern was he would nothing. Now on to the new HC search. |
|
PatShart
Chicago Blackhawks |
|
Location: Vegas, NV Joined: 06.25.2015
|
|
|
Who is to say CAR even offered anything for Lehner?
Did they go out and acquire another goaltender, since the Hawks asking price was allegedly "too high"? |
|