JJ almost had a Hainsey end-to-end special!

JJ almost had a Hainsey end-to-end special!
- Hockey66

Lol, Geno wasn't there to assist so no dice

Does JJ think he's Paul Coffey now?
- Rinosaur

Accidental deke

Nice to see Kahun still flying into the corners

Get it, AA!

Nice! Congrats kid

Nice! Congrats kid
- Thorny87

Who needs Geno?

Mark Madden tomorrow: Will Malkin's return to the lineup disrupt the chemistry the Penguins have found with Anthony Angelo?

They review penalties now?

Both sticks hit him in the face

Since when do they review high sticks??

Since when do they review high sticks??
- Hockey66

Only against the Pens lol🤣 I've never seen this before

Only against the Pens lol🤣
- 668710

And probably only for Toronto. This is some serious BS right now.

Only against the Pens lol🤣 I've never seen this before
- 668710

Pretty sure this is the first time this has ever happened.

Hahaha. Dumb (frank)ing rule. If his stick wasnt there it would’ve been right in the chops

Hahaha. Dumb (frank)ing rule. If his stick wasnt there it would’ve been right in the chops
- Thorny87

Yeah, no kidding. It was only a couple inches away, anyway.

Well, I guess all coaches can request a review of high sticks now. Good to know.

Maybe Oshie will be getting some embellishment penalties now.

Yeah, no kidding. It was only a couple inches away, anyway.

Well, I guess all coaches can request a review of high sticks now. Good to know.
- Hockey66

I can see reviewing if it’s a teammates stick. Not if the opposing players stick drives yours into your face.

I can see reviewing if it’s a teammates stick. Not if the opposing players stick drives yours into your face.
- Thorny87

At the game..most confusing thing I've ever seen.

Hahaha. Dumb (frank)ing rule. If his stick wasnt there it would’ve been right in the chops
- Thorny87

I don't disagree with the rule, but the fact is now that I understand the rule, it shouldn't have been reviewed. It is only reviewed in the case that it may be a double-minor. The issue here that double-minors or to some degree objective. Blood isn't an automatic double-minor.

I can see reviewing if it’s a teammates stick. Not if the opposing players stick drives yours into your face.
- Thorny87

Yea that's what I thought it was for.

I don't disagree with the rule, but the fact is now that I understand the rule, it shouldn't have been reviewed. It is only reviewed in the case that it may be a double-minor. The issue here that double-minors or to some degree objective. Blood isn't an automatic double-minor.
- Rinosaur

Wow so basically said, ok we'll make it a double minor so we can review it?! (frank)ing ok then

I don't disagree with the rule, but the fact is now that I understand the rule, it shouldn't have been reviewed. It is only reviewed in the case that it may be a double-minor. The issue here that double-minors or to some degree objective. Blood isn't an automatic double-minor.
- Rinosaur

When I heard it first I thought it was strictly to prevent penalizing a player when it was a teammate that caught the player high.

When I heard it first I thought it was strictly to prevent penalizing a player when it was a teammate that caught the player high.
- Thorny87

It's all based on Vegas against SJ. If a double-minor is called, they review it. What the refs basically did here is know they made a bad call and claimed double-minor to review it and reverse their bad call.

When I heard it first I thought it was strictly to prevent penalizing a player when it was a teammate that caught the player high.
- Thorny87

Right and that absolutely makes sense, I agree with it that way, not with what just happened.

It's all based on Vegas against SJ. If a double-minor is called, they review it. What the refs basically did here is know they made a bad call and claimed double-minor to review it and reverse their bad call.
- Rinosaur

Yea that's (frank)ing ridiculous