you have no condifence in the current prospects pool?
I am more optimistic than you I guess.
- fidopro

I'm very confident in the number of good young F they have! And in Primeau, the D sucks

Tatar!!!

Another point for slick nick

you have no condifence in the current prospects pool?
I am more optimistic than you I guess.
- fidopro

Personally, I'm curious to see how our D prospects will develop over time as that is the position where we need the most help right now.

I have been elected to head the north american province of the roman empire
- mr.peanut

i can't believe it. finally an election where my vote counted!

and you didn't even need russia!

I'm very confident in the number of good young F they have! And in Primeau, the D sucks

Tatar!!!
- obie

^ This

Personally, I'm curious to see how our D prospects will develop over time as that is the position where we need the most help right now.
- Garfield512

They have 1 prospect who is projected to be top 4, I guess that and Petry should be enough

i can't believe it. finally an election where my vote counted!

and you didn't even need russia!
- kicksave856

Election or Erection?

They have 1 prospect who is projected to be top 4, I guess that and Petry should be enough
- obie

Fleury will be a very good top4 imo
and then there's Romanov

Election or Erection?
- obie

yes

Fleury will be a very good top4 imo
and then there's Romanov
- fidopro

Romanov is the 1 is was referring to, I like Fleury but if he's your hopeful #3 D, you fawking suck!

Fleury will be a very good top4 imo
and then there's Romanov
- fidopro

not getting romanov to come over is a fire-able offense.

Also Mete is expendable

not getting romanov to come over is a fire-able offense.

Also Mete is expendable
- mr.peanut

Mete is a giant question mark, but you could be right for sure

Romanov is the 1 is was referring to, I like Fleury but if he's your hopeful #3 D, you fawking suck!
- obie

I disagree. I think he'll be very good.
plenty of time before kk and Caufield and Poehling are ready to have a significant impact on the team.

i can't believe it. finally an election where my vote counted!

and you didn't even need russia!
- kicksave856

i am contemplating naming you the archduke of the semi-autonomous greater jersey territory

I disagree. I think he'll be very good.
plenty of time before kk and Caufield and Poehling are ready to have a significant impact on the team.
- fidopro

A top 3 of Petry, Romanov and Fleury is horrible, now or 5 years from now...

Romanov is the 1 is was referring to, I like Fleury but if he's your hopeful #3 D, you fawking suck!
- obie

We stocked up on a few defensemen (Struble, Norlinder, Fairbrother, LeGuerrier, etc) in the last few drafts, hopefully some of them will turn out to be useful long term.

A top 3 of Petry, Romanov and Fleury is horrible, now or 5 years from now...
- obie

I'm not saying they're not missing one, especially on LD. actually I've been saying it for years now. try to follow.

i am contemplating naming you the archduke of the semi-autonomous greater jersey territory
- mr.peanut

i will work so hard you'll never be sorry you chose me.

We stocked up on a few defensemen (Struble, Norlinder, Fairbrother, LeGuerrier, etc) in the last few drafts, hopefully some of them will turn out to be useful long term.
- Garfield512

that's the spirit!

We stocked up on a few defensemen (Struble, Norlinder, Fairbrother, LeGuerrier, etc) in the last few drafts, hopefully some of them will turn out to be useful long term.
- Garfield512

You need a stud, 80% of those guys come out of the top 15 in drafts, they dont have one.... they need 2, it's all bottom pairing potential other than Romanov and maybe, maybe Brook?

The top 4 beyond Weber and Petry years looks like this

??? ???
??? Romanov


Looks pretty good to me!

I'm not saying they're not missing one, especially on LD. actually I've been saying it for years now. try to follow.
- fidopro

They need 2 that are 18-24

that's the spirit!
- fidopro

This year, I would go for a D with our first draft pick, it seems to be our most pressing need and it will be for the foreseable future IMO.

You need a stud, 80% of those guys come out of the top 15 in drafts, they dont have one.... they need 2, it's all bottom pairing potential other than Romanov and maybe, maybe Brook?

The top 4 beyond Weber and Petry years looks like this

??? ???
??? Romanov


Looks pretty good to me!
- obie

again you left Fleury out! take a break, have a kit kat

You need a stud, 80% of those guys come out of the top 15 in drafts, they dont have one.... they need 2, it's all bottom pairing potential other than Romanov and maybe, maybe Brook?

The top 4 beyond Weber and Petry years looks like this

??? ???
??? Romanov


Looks pretty good to me!
- obie

Agreed ... thus my last post above.

again you left Fleury out! take a break, have a kit kat
- fidopro

Yes, I left Fleury out of my top 4 because i hope to have a good team, thanks tips.... I'll have another scotch, you can have the kit kat