Marwood
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Cumberland, BC Joined: 03.18.2010
|
|
|
LOL and š š§
LOL
yes - CanuckDon
I don't think I'm going to make it through this week without getting banned. Two of the last 3 posts had huge potential. |
|
CanuckDon
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Las Vegas Joined: 08.05.2014
|
|
|
I don't think I'm going to make it through this week without getting banned. Two of the last 3 posts had huge potential. - Marwood
You really only have two choices. Start a bath salt and crack bender so the conversations make sense or get banned and return for the stretch drive |
|
NorthNuck
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Yellowknife, NWT Joined: 05.30.2016
|
|
|
I don't think I'm going to make it through this week without getting banned. Two of the last 3 posts had huge potential. - Marwood
|
|
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Location: Canuckville, BC Joined: 01.09.2015
|
|
|
I don't think I'm going to make it through this week without getting banned. Two of the last 3 posts had huge potential. - Marwood
The 2 emoji posts your usual input?
You must have them on speed thumbš |
|
carsonagenic
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: AB Joined: 03.08.2006
|
|
|
Poll
What would you like to see...
Donāt assume the PO race changes but it does goes down to the wire.
Sellers
Buyers
Stand pat - Nighthawk
They are obviously in the race now. It would be almost impossible for them to colapse enough for them to be sellers. There is only 12 games to the deadline! They will not throw in the towel in that timeframe... so no to sellers.
Might be minor buyer, but why with Utica depth and limited cap space. What are you going to get without giving up major asset at the worst time of the season for value? So no to major buyer.
Stand pat and work with our overall depth... yes. |
|
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Location: Canuckville, BC Joined: 01.09.2015
|
|
|
They are obviously in the race now. It would be almost impossible for them to colapse enough from them to be sellers. There is only 12 games to the deadline! They will not throw in the towel in that timeframe... so no to sellers.
Might be minor buyer, but why with Utica depth and limited cap space. What are you going to get without giving up major asset at the worst time of the season for value? So no to major buyer.
Stand pat and work with our overall depth... yes. - carsonagenic
Thatās my choice as well. I omitted the choice of a hockey trade on purpose. A bit premature imo not knowing all the sellers/buyers yet. |
|
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Location: Canuckville, BC Joined: 01.09.2015
|
|
|
NHL said best game of the last decade was the Leaf melt down in game 7. |
|
carsonagenic
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: AB Joined: 03.08.2006
|
|
|
Thatās my choice as well. I omitted the choice of a hockey trade on purpose. A bit premature imo not knowing all the sellers/buyers yet. - Nighthawk
That being said, this is a tough roadtrip coming up. They do need to bank some points off of it. |
|
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Location: Canuckville, BC Joined: 01.09.2015
|
|
|
That being said, this is a tough roadtrip coming up. They do need to bank some points off of it. - carsonagenic
You know it. Have to keep it on the tracks & grind it to the end of 82. |
|
carsonagenic
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: AB Joined: 03.08.2006
|
|
|
You know it. Have to keep it on the tracks & grind it to the end of 82. - Nighthawk
Its all just mathamatics now,
33 games remaining and we have 58 points.
What is the magic number to clinch a spot, 94?
So we need 36 points.
It does seem, with our games in hand, and if we take care of the divisional games, we are in.
|
|
LordHumungous
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Greetings from the Humungous. Ayatollah of rock and rolla! Joined: 08.15.2014
|
|
|
I gotta say tho, we are playing much better defensively lately. Last game I notice much better zone exits and neutral zone play that show the staff tightened the belt defensively. It's great that the team can respond to new instructions that quickly. Suggests green has some playoffs aces saved - SMBDragon
I wouldn't expect playoffs just yet but yes, you are correct they are playing a stronger defensive game. |
|
Nucker101
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Vancouver, BC Joined: 09.26.2010
|
|
|
Thatās my choice as well. I omitted the choice of a hockey trade on purpose. A bit premature imo not knowing all the sellers/buyers yet. - Nighthawk
How about Max Domi as a playmaking winger for Bo? Provides some grit for the playoffs and fits in with the age group of the core.
What would you offer? |
|
CanuckDon
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Las Vegas Joined: 08.05.2014
|
|
|
How about Max Domi as a playmaking winger for Bo? Provides some grit for the playoffs and fits in with the age group of the core.
What would you offer? - Nucker101
Troll |
|
carsonagenic
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: AB Joined: 03.08.2006
|
|
|
I wouldn't expect playoffs just yet but yes, you are correct they are playing a stronger defensive game. - LordHumungous
So you dont think they can get 36 points in 33 games?
15 wins
12 losses
6 OTL's
= 94 points
That seems easily doable to me. Just need to get some of those wins against divisional foes.
Thats not to pom pom is it? |
|
Nucker101
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Vancouver, BC Joined: 09.26.2010
|
|
|
Troll - CanuckDon
How? His name has been popping up in rumours and he'd be perfect beside Bo. They've known each other since they were 10 years old as well so he'd be a seamless fit into the locker room.
And he brings that grit that people are always asking for.
It's basically as logical of a trade idea as anyone can come up with. |
|
Marwood
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Cumberland, BC Joined: 03.18.2010
|
|
|
Troll - CanuckDon
One of the best. |
|
carsonagenic
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: AB Joined: 03.08.2006
|
|
|
How? His name has been popping up in rumours and he'd be perfect beside Bo. They've known each other since they were 10 years old as well so he'd be a seamless fit into the locker room.
And he brings that grit that people are always asking for.
It's basically as logical of a trade idea as anyone can come up with. - Nucker101
I think the cost would be too much for him. Too early in this window to be giving up a first rounderš |
|
Retinalz
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Vancouver, BC Joined: 01.31.2015
|
|
|
How? His name has been popping up in rumours and he'd be perfect beside Bo. They've known each other since they were 10 years old as well so he'd be a seamless fit into the locker room.
And he brings that grit that people are always asking for.
It's basically as logical of a trade idea as anyone can come up with. - Nucker101
I don't think it would be worth the price. He would be pricey, plus we would need to dump salary, which just increases the price. |
|
LordHumungous
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Greetings from the Humungous. Ayatollah of rock and rolla! Joined: 08.15.2014
|
|
|
So you dont think they can get 36 points in 33 games?
15 wins
12 losses
6 OTL's
= 94 points
That seems easily doable to me. Just need to get some of those wins against divisional foes.
Thats not to pom pom is it? - carsonagenic
Not at all lol just a lot of things need to go our way. Injuries could still be a factor and the divisional games are important yes. Depends on how we handle the next losing streak. Basically if this 'is' a PO team they will play through the next losing streak and make it in. Comfortably you need 96+ points which they are on pace for...but again a lot needs to go our way and we'll need help from other teams down the 3 point game stretches. |
|
Marwood
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Cumberland, BC Joined: 03.18.2010
|
|
|
How? His name has been popping up in rumours and he'd be perfect beside Bo. They've known each other since they were 10 years old as well so he'd be a seamless fit into the locker room.
And he brings that grit that people are always asking for.
It's basically as logical of a trade idea as anyone can come up with. - Nucker101
No it's not. Why shake up team chemistry when they are 1st in their division? |
|
Nucker101
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Vancouver, BC Joined: 09.26.2010
|
|
|
I think the cost would be too much for him. Too early in this window to be giving up a first rounderš - carsonagenic
Could do OJ + a lower pick |
|
Nucker101
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Vancouver, BC Joined: 09.26.2010
|
|
|
I don't think it would be worth the price. He would be pricey, plus we would need to dump salary, which just increases the price. - Retinalz
true, Benning would have to throw in Sven or Sutter to trade one of them elsewhere first |
|
Nucker101
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Vancouver, BC Joined: 09.26.2010
|
|
|
No it's not. Why shake up team chemistry when they are 1st in their division? - Marwood
Because the goal is eventually a cup, not just the playoffs
You guys aren't thinking big enough |
|
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Location: Canuckville, BC Joined: 01.09.2015
|
|
|
So Friedman says VGK & Gallant had contract talks before he was fired. Is that weird or what. |
|
Marwood
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Cumberland, BC Joined: 03.18.2010
|
|
|
Because the goal is eventually a cup, not just the playoffs
You guys aren't thinking big enough - Nucker101
Too costly and no cap space even though that isn't a problem. |
|