Yes, yes and yes.
I think that "need to be professional" portion is the main point to focus on going forward - or in other words - "don't pull that work-to-rule garbage again"...
what they did - whether intentionally or unintentionally - to Kaskisuo was unforgivable. I would hope that Shanahan (not Dubas) would walk into the locker room at the morning skate when Kaskisuo is starting - and say something like - 'time to pay the team, fans and that guy(K) back".
It is ultimately up to Dubas to actually "manage" this part of the team dynamic going forward.
Fact is - the rift (or whatever you want to call it) between Dubas and Babcock - should never have been allowed to get to this point. Egos aside - and Babcock isn't the only one with a giant ego in this equation - their responsibility is to the team - not their own agendas. Same goes for the players.
I don't know about you... but I don't really want to hear anything about philosophy anymore. This isn't about philosophy.. "Can I build a roster than wins"? ... don't care. I'm more interested in "can I adjust my roster in the face of obvious needs"?
What was Babcock accused of THE MOST? Not adjusting - his goal tender usage? his PP deployment? his defensive structure? his in game adjustments? non-existent would be the general observation - so Babcock is therefore a stubborn unbending jerk
What has Dubas adjusted in his "roster construction"? ... exactly, nothing..
so therefore Dubas is and unbending jerk - "philosophically" speaking?
- BorjeFan4Ever
Why should Dubas alter his roster construction when his coach has decided not to apply his philosophy on the ice?
The GM is accountable for the vision of the team. The coach is responsible for taking the pieces given to him and ensuring that the vision is executed.
I think it's pretty clear that Babcock was NOT trying to execute Dubas's vision. Tyson Barrie's quote after last night's game was pretty telling:
"That style that you saw tonight, you're going to see a lot more of it."