Wanna blog? Start your own hockey blog with My HockeyBuzz. Register for free today!
 
Forums :: Blog World :: Carol Schram: Who would you like to see the Canucks acquire in a Loui Eriksson trade?
Author Message
1970vintage
Seattle Kraken
Location: BC
Joined: 11.11.2010

Jul 14 @ 11:17 PM ET
Medical report stating will miss 10 games or 24 days or more.
- Nighthawk


Yes, but what I’m saying is the Canucks don’t get $86.5 cap because Rousel is injured. The cap is still $83.5 (or whatever it is). They can go over the cap (provided they are already at the cap) for the duration of his injury, by the amount of his salary. But as soon as he is cleared to play, they have to move that $3m off the books to be compliant.
SMBDragon
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Escaped from Krypton
Joined: 07.29.2010

Jul 14 @ 11:18 PM ET
Teams with cap space are generally going to use that cap space and ask for something in return. Not really worth it to Van to give up assets right now with other options available. No one team needs to get to the cap floor. Actual dollars would only work if you took back a similar contract only to buy it out. Stuck with a longer term problem potentially.
- manvanfan

Edmonton was interested in him and tried to trade for him but he vetoed the trade as 1 of 4 teams he would refuse. This is what I was told yesterday.
I think we will have to play him.... again IF he reports. Moving to Dallas suggests he might not.
But maybe he just moved for the summer, you know how those reports are, panic oriented lol.

The only other option is working him into a trade already involving other players
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Canuckville, BC
Joined: 01.09.2015

Jul 14 @ 11:21 PM ET
Yes, but what I’m saying is the Canucks don’t get $86.5 cap because Rousel is injured. The cap is still $83.5 (or whatever it is). They can go over the cap (provided they are already at the cap) for the duration of his injury, by the amount of his salary. But as soon as he is cleared to play, they have to move that $3m off the books to be compliant.
- 1970vintage

Yes but i don’t see compliance a problem.
1970vintage
Seattle Kraken
Location: BC
Joined: 11.11.2010

Jul 14 @ 11:24 PM ET
Yes but i don’t see compliance a problem.
- Nighthawk


Then LTIR isn’t an issue. They have room to sign all their guys now, including Rousel.
Reubenkincade
Location: BC
Joined: 11.18.2016

Jul 14 @ 11:25 PM ET
$3m more when Roussel on LTIR
- Nighthawk


Yes, I think every single Canuck fan knows, that the Canucks can exceed the cap by the salary of Roussel, until he returns, you obviously missed the whole point, if you thought that rant was about cap space.
SMBDragon
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Escaped from Krypton
Joined: 07.29.2010

Jul 14 @ 11:26 PM ET
I think LE might have a bit of a bounce back year. The team is far deeper overall than if has been since any point he's been here. Obviously, you don't pass up a good deal but you don't take a bad one back just for the sake of change.

If he doesn't report, he's breaching the contract.

- golfingsince

I think you are right. The team as a whole may just improve his stats/play. As I said earlier its possible his play improves.
Ya I cant imagine he wants a breach of contract issue unless he's pursuing a contract cancellation. I'd think jp Barry would be advising against it
A_SteamingLombardi
Location: Systemic failure / Slurptastic
Joined: 10.12.2008

Jul 14 @ 11:27 PM ET
CanuckDon
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Las Vegas
Joined: 08.05.2014

Jul 14 @ 11:29 PM ET
Don 1
Red 0

- Nighthawk

Thank you 🙏
CanuckDon
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Las Vegas
Joined: 08.05.2014

Jul 14 @ 11:30 PM ET
Also, he said attractable...
- 1970vintage

How did a Hawks fan even get in here 🤷‍♂️
Codes1087
Vancouver Canucks
Joined: 09.24.2014

Jul 14 @ 11:32 PM ET
There was articles on this.
Lots of people saw the same info. I'm not the only person saying it either.
It's also long been said that he was an effective penalty killer

- SMBDragon


Those same articles said Hutton was a top 4 dman
1970vintage
Seattle Kraken
Location: BC
Joined: 11.11.2010

Jul 14 @ 11:33 PM ET
How did a Hawks fan even get in here 🤷‍♂️
- CanuckDon


They’re like tics. They burrow deep and suck our life blood to stay alive.
1970vintage
Seattle Kraken
Location: BC
Joined: 11.11.2010

Jul 14 @ 11:34 PM ET
Those same articles said Hutton was a top 4 dman
- Codes1087


He is, just not on a good team...
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Canuckville, BC
Joined: 01.09.2015

Jul 14 @ 11:35 PM ET
Yes, I think every single Canuck fan knows, that the Canucks can exceed the cap by the salary of Roussel, until he returns, you obviously missed the whole point, if you thought that rant was about cap space.
- Reubenkincade

No i missed nothing. I’m sure Brock & Goldy can be signed & the following demotions make us compliant.
Codes1087
Vancouver Canucks
Joined: 09.24.2014

Jul 14 @ 11:35 PM ET
He is, just not on a good team...
- 1970vintage


So hes not a top 4 man d man lol. Probably best to gauge players based on comparisons of top teams instead of bottom if we want to one day get better
SMBDragon
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Escaped from Krypton
Joined: 07.29.2010

Jul 14 @ 11:36 PM ET
Or he has checked out mentally (as his comments would suggest) and it will be a waste of our time.
- LordHumungous

It seems he did that his 1st season when he was taken off the Sedin line. Panties got all twisted after that
1970vintage
Seattle Kraken
Location: BC
Joined: 11.11.2010

Jul 14 @ 11:36 PM ET
No i missed nothing. I’m sure Brock & Goldy can be signed & the following demotions make us compliant.
- Nighthawk


Brock and Goldy? Who are the demotions? We’ll see I guess.
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Canuckville, BC
Joined: 01.09.2015

Jul 14 @ 11:37 PM ET
Then LTIR isn’t an issue. They have room to sign all their guys now, including Rousel.
- 1970vintage

Never thought compliance was an issue.
Sign Brock & Goldy no probs.
Roussel is already signed.
1970vintage
Seattle Kraken
Location: BC
Joined: 11.11.2010

Jul 14 @ 11:38 PM ET
So hes not a top 4 man d man lol. Probably best to gauge players based on comparisons of top teams instead of bottom if we want to one day get better
- Codes1087


I think Hutty could be a decent 3rd pairing guy. Bet you Canucks sign him to a two year two million per deal.
neem55
Vancouver Canucks
Joined: 02.02.2012

Jul 14 @ 11:39 PM ET
He is, just not on a good team...
- 1970vintage

Ya bad teams have bad dmen in their top4. Not the same as him actually being a legit top4 guy, which he has proven he is not
1970vintage
Seattle Kraken
Location: BC
Joined: 11.11.2010

Jul 14 @ 11:39 PM ET
Never thought compliance was an issue.
Sign Brock & Goldy no probs.
Roussel is already signed.

- Nighthawk


Clearly you didn’t understand.

It’s ok, I forgive you.
1970vintage
Seattle Kraken
Location: BC
Joined: 11.11.2010

Jul 14 @ 11:42 PM ET
Ya bad teams have bad dmen in their top4. Not the same as him actually being a legit top4 guy, which he has proven he is not
- neem55


I literally have no idea what you are trying to say?

Canucks have been a very bad teen. Hutton has been playing top 4 for the Canucks. Ergo, Hutton is a top 4 D on a bad team.
onesmallleap
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Be Calm n Swede On, BC
Joined: 09.23.2015

Jul 14 @ 11:47 PM ET
It seems he did that his 1st season when he was taken off the Sedin line. Panties got all twisted after that
- SMBDragon

The best we got was LE Sutter Grandlund when WD still coached, and for whatever reason TG refused to try that again. His family moving to a "base of operations" makes sense , and probably makes it easier to find him a new home. Green has to show some class and make an attempt to make amends.
Reubenkincade
Location: BC
Joined: 11.18.2016

Jul 14 @ 11:48 PM ET
Clearly you didn’t understand.

It’s ok, I forgive you.

- 1970vintage


Lol
SMBDragon
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Escaped from Krypton
Joined: 07.29.2010

Jul 14 @ 11:48 PM ET
I'm with Golfing.
Give Loui a clean slate and see what happens, play him with Petey and Ferland for 5-10 games and if he produces, his trade value goes and might actually be worth keeping.

Worst case scenario, is he sucks and the team is back where they are.

- belcherbd

He's never played with Peter and brock. Try it. Never know could turn into the best line in hockey.
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Canuckville, BC
Joined: 01.09.2015

Jul 14 @ 11:49 PM ET
Barring a trade(s) there is only what Brock comes in at & Goldy will be cheap. Onto training camp & TG probably inputs his line-up & JB demotes who or what is necessary.
Page: Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30  Next