Wanna blog? Start your own hockey blog with My HockeyBuzz. Register for free today!
 
Forums :: Blog World :: Carol Schram: Who would you like to see the Canucks acquire in a Loui Eriksson trade?
Author Message
CanuckDon
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Las Vegas
Joined: 08.05.2014

Jul 14 @ 3:47 PM ET


Kind of insulting...

I wouldn't trade Seabrook straight up for Eriksson.... DeBrincat is untouchable, Kid just put up 41 goals last season and has easy 50 goal potential at some point over the next couple of seasons, wouldn't be shocked if he hit 50 as soon as next season.

DeBrincat is part of the future...

Seabrook's contract is indeed a ball & chain, but so is Loui Eriksson....

Seriously, you want to dump Eriksson you're going to have to add a sweetener of some sort and perhaps even retain salary - that or swap on terrible contract for another....

Besides, Seabrooks contract is becoming a bit more attractable over time considering his salary was front loaded so his actual salary goes down every season, so in a season or 2 he will be an attractive player for a team looking to hit the cap floor while while paying minimal salary on a higher cap hit....

- Savard2Secord

Your last paragraph is (frank)ing laughable. Sounds eerily similar to what the idiots on here say about Loui. Bath salts for you 🧂🛀
canuckfan069
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Langley, BC
Joined: 02.28.2006

Jul 14 @ 3:49 PM ET


Kind of insulting...

I wouldn't trade Seabrook straight up for Eriksson.... DeBrincat is untouchable, Kid just put up 41 goals last season and has easy 50 goal potential at some point over the next couple of seasons, wouldn't be shocked if he hit 50 as soon as next season.



DeBrincat is part of the future...

Seabrook's contract is indeed a ball & chain, but so is Loui Eriksson....

Seriously, you want to dump Eriksson you're going to have to add a sweetener of some sort and perhaps even retain salary - that or swap on terrible contract for another....

Besides, Seabrooks contract is becoming a bit more attractable over time considering his salary was front loaded so his actual salary goes down every season, so in a season or 2 he will be an attractive player for a team looking to hit the cap floor while while paying minimal salary on a higher cap hit....

- Savard2Secord


You wouldn't trade Seabrook for Eriksson straight up? You are (frank)ing delusional lol
CanuckDon
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Las Vegas
Joined: 08.05.2014

Jul 14 @ 3:50 PM ET
You wouldn't trade Seabrook for Eriksson straight up? You are (frank)ing delusional lol
- canuckfan069

Come on man. He isn’t delusional he is high as (frank) in the park
canuckfan069
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Langley, BC
Joined: 02.28.2006

Jul 14 @ 3:51 PM ET
Come on man. He isn’t delusional he is high as (frank) in the park
- CanuckDon

Lol..no kidding.
CoolerHeads
Joined: 07.04.2015

Jul 14 @ 4:08 PM ET
The Canucks can wait. True. But at what cost to the team development?
- NuckUp


Best thing for everyone would be for Eriksson to be traded - should have never been signed and is better off not on this team - no debate there. If they can trade him great.

I guess my point is they shouldn’t trade him out of desperation as there is a good chance he will have more “value” at the TDL or next summer - if they play him in a similar role next season.

Bach was on Sportsnet650 suggesting they include Jake just to get rid of him. That would be a huge mistake IMHO.
LordHumungous
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Greetings from the Humungous. Ayatollah of rock and rolla!
Joined: 08.15.2014

Jul 14 @ 4:09 PM ET
You are an idiot if you think Miller is a questionable top 6 player. Nothing more I can say
- CanuckDon

Remember, Gaunce is gonna win a cup on a different club.

CanuckDon
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Las Vegas
Joined: 08.05.2014

Jul 14 @ 4:11 PM ET
Remember, Gaunce is gonna win a cup on a different club.


- LordHumungous


Shinkaruk Gaunce Jensen

Corrado Subban

Lack

Your 2020 Vancouver Bath salts
VanHockeyGuy
Location: “Who are we to think we’re anybody?” - Tocchet. Penticton, BC
Joined: 04.26.2012

Jul 14 @ 4:12 PM ET
Per Satiar Shah: I’m still keeping an eye on the Stars as a potential destination for Loui Eriksson.

Could see something involving Cogliano who has 2 years at $3.25M per left and/or Comeau who also has 2 years remaining at $2.4M per

- Codes1087


Apparently family is already there.
LordHumungous
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Greetings from the Humungous. Ayatollah of rock and rolla!
Joined: 08.15.2014

Jul 14 @ 4:13 PM ET
Shinkaruk Gaunce Jensen

Corrado Subban

Lack

Your 2020 Vancouver Bath salts

- CanuckDon

See #redmile for the all-troll Canucks line up lol
CoolerHeads
Joined: 07.04.2015

Jul 14 @ 4:13 PM ET
Jim Benning will learn how to slow jam before he figures out the slow play.
- k


Add a hat and glasses and he could easily be a Blues Brother. They had a couple slow jams.
CoolerHeads
Joined: 07.04.2015

Jul 14 @ 4:15 PM ET
cant everyone just finally admit the stealth tank was real
- BobBot


Plus one
Redmile247
Calgary Flames
Joined: 03.17.2013

Jul 14 @ 4:18 PM ET


Kind of insulting...

I wouldn't trade Seabrook straight up for Eriksson.... DeBrincat is untouchable, Kid just put up 41 goals last season and has easy 50 goal potential at some point over the next couple of seasons, wouldn't be shocked if he hit 50 as soon as next season.

DeBrincat is part of the future...

Seabrook's contract is indeed a ball & chain, but so is Loui Eriksson....

Seriously, you want to dump Eriksson you're going to have to add a sweetener of some sort and perhaps even retain salary - that or swap on terrible contract for another....

Besides, Seabrooks contract is becoming a bit more attractable over time considering his salary was front loaded so his actual salary goes down every season, so in a season or 2 he will be an attractive player for a team looking to hit the cap floor while while paying minimal salary on a higher cap hit....

- Savard2Secord


Given age/contract/expansion draft /production/defensive abilities

In any Eriksson for Seabrook deal the hawks are adding ...and I don’t think a first is enough

That’s one ugly contract ....
CoolerHeads
Joined: 07.04.2015

Jul 14 @ 4:18 PM ET
Ok JP


Edit: 🧂🛀

- CanuckDon


Who is JP?
Redmile247
Calgary Flames
Joined: 03.17.2013

Jul 14 @ 4:20 PM ET
See #redmile for the all-troll Canucks line up lol
- LordHumungous


I think I may have to take a look at each team and make an All buyout team

Eriksson
Neal
Lucic
Seabrook

That’s just the start
CanuckDon
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Las Vegas
Joined: 08.05.2014

Jul 14 @ 4:20 PM ET
Who is JP?
- CoolerHeads

JP Barry - Loui’s Agent
NuckUp
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Cap Busters
Joined: 07.01.2019

Jul 14 @ 4:22 PM ET
Sven is worth keeping to see if he can stay healthy and put together a season. His value is to low right now to trade. Sutter...his value is low but I don’t think it’s ever coming back up.
- canucksfan1944


The good thing here is the Canucks no longer need to rely on their performance. They have players to replace them. It would be nice to get some value from them but addition by subtraction works too.
Bob_Zuruncle
Location: CEO Mark Porter, NJ
Joined: 04.21.2006

Jul 14 @ 4:26 PM ET
has brodie for eriksson happened yet?
manvanfan
Vancouver Canucks
Location: MB
Joined: 01.21.2012

Jul 14 @ 4:31 PM ET
The good thing here is the Canucks no longer need to rely on their performance. They have players to replace them. It would be nice to get some value from them but addition by subtraction works too.
- NuckUp

Knowing this team having a 3 million dollar player in the press box injured will happen one after another. No trade would even be needed.
Marwood
Location: Cumberland, BC
Joined: 03.18.2010

Jul 14 @ 4:34 PM ET
has brodie for eriksson happened yet?
- Bob_Zuruncle

Don't know, been doing Listerine bombs in the park with Tiny Jump & the bath salts crew.
Bob_Zuruncle
Location: CEO Mark Porter, NJ
Joined: 04.21.2006

Jul 14 @ 4:40 PM ET
Don't know, been doing Listerine bombs in the park with Tiny Jump & the bath salts crew.
- Marwood

NOICE!
belcherbd
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Nanaimo
Joined: 02.16.2007

Jul 14 @ 4:46 PM ET
I still like Wennberg as the target for either an Eriksson or Sutter trade.
Cbus needs NHL players and Wennberg isn't going to bounce back under Torts.

CanuckDon
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Las Vegas
Joined: 08.05.2014

Jul 14 @ 4:55 PM ET
Don't know, been doing Listerine bombs in the park with Tiny Jump & the bath salts crew.
- Marwood

Tiny and Kuzzi’s crew is growing! Make bath salts great again
NuckUp
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Cap Busters
Joined: 07.01.2019

Jul 14 @ 5:00 PM ET
Best thing for everyone would be for Eriksson to be traded - should have never been signed and is better off not on this team - no debate there. If they can trade him great.

I guess my point is they shouldn’t trade him out of desperation as there is a good chance he will have more “value” at the TDL or next summer - if they play him in a similar role next season.

Bach was on Sportsnet650 suggesting they include Jake just to get rid of him. That would be a huge mistake IMHO.

- CoolerHeads


No need to include assets just to dump his contract at this point. Yeah I would just waive him in that case. Maybe you are right, a low cap team, sees value in his PK ability.
A_SteamingLombardi
Location: Systemic failure / Slurptastic
Joined: 10.12.2008

Jul 14 @ 5:00 PM ET
Best thing for everyone would be for Eriksson to be traded - should have never been signed and is better off not on this team - no debate there. If they can trade him great.

I guess my point is they shouldn’t trade him out of desperation as there is a good chance he will have more “value” at the TDL or next summer - if they play him in a similar role next season.

Bach was on Sportsnet650 suggesting they include Jake just to get rid of him. That would be a huge mistake IMHO.

- CoolerHeads

SMBDragon
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Escaped from Krypton
Joined: 07.29.2010

Jul 14 @ 5:20 PM ET
No need to include assets just to dump his contract at this point. Yeah I would just waive him in that case. Maybe you are right, a low cap team, sees value in his PK ability.
- NuckUp

Or if he reports next season maybe just play him if no trade is made.
Play him solely on pk till his attitude changes and actually puts in effort. Its possible he gets his play in order....not bloody likely but possible.
Page: Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30  Next