DrunkenCanuck
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Location: Check your PM, ON Joined: 07.14.2009
|
|
|
Luke fn Schenn👍 - mr.sir
Luke Schenn would be a lock on this D atm |
|
JohnFergusonJr
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: I'd be happy with Che Guevara; hero of the Cuban revolution. - Canada Cup aka AOCC Joined: 01.14.2011
|
|
|
I hate Stralman
No - mr.sir
Why?
There might not be enough money for Stralman but if they can find it, he would be a welcomed addition to the Leafs lineup.
He's a #4 D at this point and knowing the Leafs they'll play him like Hainsey but I'd rather have Stralman on the cheap than nobody at this point. |
|
JohnFergusonJr
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: I'd be happy with Che Guevara; hero of the Cuban revolution. - Canada Cup aka AOCC Joined: 01.14.2011
|
|
|
Luke Schenn would be a lock on this D atm - DrunkenCanuck
Could probably handle 16-18 minutes a night with the right partner as a 6/7 D. |
|
DrunkenCanuck
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Location: Check your PM, ON Joined: 07.14.2009
|
|
|
Could probably handle 16-18 minutes a night with the right partner as a 6/7 D. - JohnFergusonJr
Phaneuf or Hainsey? |
|
Monkeypunk
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: Whenever, wherever, ON Joined: 06.27.2013
|
|
|
6 players under 1M
21 players listed out of, a usual 22 (23?) roster
Kessel cap hit is 1.2 (I think?)
People who pointed out the cap problems conclude we would have like 7 or 8 players 1M or under. Your roster bears this out.
Maybe that works out just fine, but having 1/3 of your roster under 1M sounds like a lot of potential issues in the lineup
AND... they have to get rid of Nylander to achieve all of this.
You think that is not a problem? - Aetherial
St. Louis had about 9 players at or under $1.
The Capitals the year before had 7.
The Pens the year before had about 10.
The year before that the Pens had about 8 or 9.
Apparently it's not that much of a problem.
Realistically, your 4th line, and 5/6 D, and maybe your backup goalie should all be cheap. That's 6 potential $1m players right there. Throw in a couple of rookies and cheap contracts, and you're sitting at 9 players, which allows you to maximize your superstar salary.
|
|
mr.sir
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: Vancouver Island, BC Joined: 01.18.2015
|
|
|
Phaneuf or Hainsey? - DrunkenCanuck
Hainsey and Schenn |
|
|
|
That's a cap hit as it pertains to the calculation for offer sheets only. His salary cap hit is still the salary he'd agree to.
While I'm pretty sure the Leafs would walk away from $14m, I wonder where they walk away? I think the absolute top-end if you're the Leafs (and you want to push it) is probably $11 million. That gets into the realm of stupid. - Monkeypunk
Exactly. Who even has that type of cap space available, let alone $14M per and is willing to sacrifice FOUR 1st's?
I'm not even sure teams would do that for McDavid... |
|
RogerRoeper
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
Location: Toronto, ON Joined: 03.27.2007
|
|
|
I think Kyle Doofus is the hold up. Why are some of you turning on Marner, who is a home grown talent that we haven’t seen in decades, lives and loves the Leafs, projects to be a top 10pt player in the league for years to come... In favour of a well spoken dork who’s done nothing well since taking over? He’s overpaid the other two, why wouldn’t Marner expect the same? - DrunkenCanuck
People still think NYlander is overpaid? LOL |
|
DrunkenCanuck
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Location: Check your PM, ON Joined: 07.14.2009
|
|
|
Hainsey and Schenn - mr.sir
Yep. Makes too much sense for the current mgmt though. |
|
DrunkenCanuck
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Location: Check your PM, ON Joined: 07.14.2009
|
|
|
People still think NYlander is overpaid? LOL - RogerRoeper
Wild Bill says Hi |
|
Monkeypunk
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: Whenever, wherever, ON Joined: 06.27.2013
|
|
|
Exactly. Who even has that type of cap space available, let alone $14M per and is willing to sacrifice FOUR 1st's?
I'm not even sure teams would do that for McDavid... - As_I_See_It
I would do it in a heartbeat for McDavid.
But your point is completely taken. I think it's a move of sheer desperation in a time where 1st round picks are a remarkably valuable commodity because they afford you those $1m dollar players for 3 years who can potentially play up in your lineup.
If you sign Marner, you'd better be positive you're going to be good and relevant for all 4 years. |
|
Monkeypunk
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: Whenever, wherever, ON Joined: 06.27.2013
|
|
|
Hainsey and Schenn - mr.sir
Hainsey and Schenn? With their footspeed, who is going to be near the puck? |
|
JohnFergusonJr
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: I'd be happy with Che Guevara; hero of the Cuban revolution. - Canada Cup aka AOCC Joined: 01.14.2011
|
|
|
Phaneuf or Hainsey? - DrunkenCanuck
Hard pass on both.
They suck.
They're past their prime (Phaneuf never had one).
Ineffective veterans < Rookies. |
|
DrunkenCanuck
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Location: Check your PM, ON Joined: 07.14.2009
|
|
|
Hainsey and Schenn? With their footspeed, who is going to be near the puck? - Monkeypunk
Marner |
|
JohnFergusonJr
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: I'd be happy with Che Guevara; hero of the Cuban revolution. - Canada Cup aka AOCC Joined: 01.14.2011
|
|
|
Exactly. Who even has that type of cap space available, let alone $14M per and is willing to sacrifice FOUR 1st's?
I'm not even sure teams would do that for McDavid... - As_I_See_It
The Islanders.
They have the coach, they have the team defense and if they keep Lehner, they have the goalie. They lack the offense (Leafs stole it from them).
There are a couple teams out there that, if they make the playoffs every year, don't give a poop about giving up four 20th-25th picks for Marner. |
|
DrunkenCanuck
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Location: Check your PM, ON Joined: 07.14.2009
|
|
|
I’m convinced a deal will get done. Of the three that will be overpaid, please consider which one is durable and can play the PK very well and will only get better defensively. Can you even consider putting the other two on the PK? No. No you can’t. |
|
Monkeypunk
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: Whenever, wherever, ON Joined: 06.27.2013
|
|
|
The Islanders.
They have the coach, they have the team defense and if they keep Lehner, they have the goalie. They lack the offense (Leafs stole it from them).
There are a couple teams out there that, if they make the playoffs every year, don't give a poop about giving up four 20th-25th picks for Marner. - JohnFergusonJr
So the guy who pissed Marner off in the first place by not giving him his Schedule 'B' bonuses is the guy he wants to sign with? It better be a mind-bogglingly big offer, I would think.
I guess we'll see. |
|
JohnFergusonJr
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: I'd be happy with Che Guevara; hero of the Cuban revolution. - Canada Cup aka AOCC Joined: 01.14.2011
|
|
|
So the guy who pissed Marner off in the first place by not giving him his Schedule 'B' bonuses is the guy he wants to sign with? It better be a mind-bogglingly big offer, I would think.
I guess we'll see. - Monkeypunk
I'm not saying the Islanders will do it, I'm just saying they could if they wanted to.
And we're talking about money here, right? If Lou gives him what he wants this time around, pretty sure the chump change he didn't make last time is water under the bridge.
Another example, The Predators.
They have 11 forwards, 8 D and 2 goalies with 13.1 million in cap space.
You think they care about four 1st round picks? |
|
Monkeypunk
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: Whenever, wherever, ON Joined: 06.27.2013
|
|
|
I’m convinced a deal will get done. Of the three that will be overpaid, please consider which one is durable and can play the PK very well and will only get better defensively. Can you even consider putting the other two on the PK? No. No you can’t. - DrunkenCanuck
I think a deal will get done. There's a lot of posturing and high-stakes chicken. Both sides can lose here.
The Leafs can only pay so much despite how good Marner is.
Marner wants to be a Leaf.
I think all of the elite RFAs are sort of waiting for a ball to drop so they can start moving. |
|
gergeswillems
Detroit Red Wings |
|
|
Location: Malkin wants to be The Man, ON Joined: 02.01.2016
|
|
|
Hainsey and Schenn? With their footspeed, who is going to be near the puck? - Monkeypunk
The other team? |
|
DrunkenCanuck
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Location: Check your PM, ON Joined: 07.14.2009
|
|
|
I think a deal will get done. There's a lot of posturing and high-stakes chicken. Both sides can lose here.
The Leafs can only pay so much despite how good Marner is.
Marner wants to be a Leaf.
I think all of the elite RFAs are sort of waiting for a ball to drop so they can start moving. - Monkeypunk
Bang on |
|
DrunkenCanuck
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Location: Check your PM, ON Joined: 07.14.2009
|
|
|
The other team? - gergeswillems
We should see what Kronwall is doing then. |
|
|
|
The Islanders.
They have the coach, they have the team defense and if they keep Lehner, they have the goalie. They lack the offense (Leafs stole it from them).
There are a couple teams out there that, if they make the playoffs every year, don't give a poop about giving up four 20th-25th picks for Marner. - JohnFergusonJr
NYI would also be thinking of Barzal coming down the pipe and possibly getting sheeted. Even if they sheeted Marner and Barzal wasn’t sheeted, what is Barzal’s asking when he sees Marner making $14M per? |
|
gergeswillems
Detroit Red Wings |
|
|
Location: Malkin wants to be The Man, ON Joined: 02.01.2016
|
|
|
We should see what Kronwall is doing then. - DrunkenCanuck
He's trying to decide if coming back to the worst team in the NHL for another season is worth it or not. |
|
Monkeypunk
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: Whenever, wherever, ON Joined: 06.27.2013
|
|
|
I'm not saying the Islanders will do it, I'm just saying they could if they wanted to.
And we're talking about money here, right? If Lou gives him what he wants this time around, pretty sure the chump change he didn't make last time is water under the bridge.
Another example, The Predators.
They have 11 forwards, 8 D and 2 goalies with 13.1 million in cap space.
You think they care about four 1st round picks? - JohnFergusonJr
I think they do care, obviously.
It's not impossible. Nashville is another team with many moving parts. They moved PK to get room for Josi. If they want to keep Granlund and Smith and Watson . . . they can't really be players.
The point isn't that someone won't, the point is that you need to know your team is there now, and you're ready now to contend for 4 years.
It's a bigger roll of the dice than when Burke acquired Kessel, but you are getting a better player for your gamble.
|
|