I like Boldy as well, this year it's tougher to pick.
- VanHockeyGuy

In Judd we trust.

May have given up the demand for a 3rd year.
- A_SteamingLombardi

May also be why they’re shopping Tanev more. Sign Edler for two, trade Tanev for picks

Florida has 0 goalie prospects and their starters are crap. What do you think if we could package Demko + middling prospect (Lockwood?) and later pick to try and get the 13th? Based on the old 9th (Horvat) for Schneider deal? ( and the Bob rumour not happening) it compares.
10th and 13th would get us Boldy / Zegras and Newhook😁
- carsonagenic

I’d package Markstrom for a 1st in a split second if that deal were out there.

Florida has 0 goalie prospects and their starters are crap. What do you think if we could package Demko + middling prospect (Lockwood?) and later pick to try and get the 13th? Based on the old 9th (Horvat) for Schneider deal? ( and the Bob rumour not happening) it compares.
10th and 13th would get us Boldy / Zegras and Newhook😁
- carsonagenic

Yup, and that's one position we're okay with depth wise.

I’d package Markstrom for a 1st in a split second if that deal were out there.
- DrChristianTroy

You are also a whore for draft picks. So there is that

I’d package Markstrom for a 1st in a split second if that deal were out there.
- DrChristianTroy

Full circle LOL.

I’d package Markstrom for a 1st in a split second if that deal were out there.
- DrChristianTroy

Same thoughts on Markstrom, but would Florida want him back? Thats why I went Demko.

You are also a whore for draft picks. So there is that
- CanuckDon

Do you know the difference between a slut and a whore?

A slut will f*ck everyone in town, a whore will f*ck everyone in town (except you)

I'm going with Krebs or Seider.
- VanHockeyGuy

Those 2 are my least fav options of the guys I wouldn’t mind... Starting to realize there might not be a scenario where I’d be happy with Seider being our 1st round haul despite him being my 2nd ranked Dman. I much prefer the forwards this year.

You are also a whore for draft picks. So there is that
- CanuckDon

I’m a whore for using current value (that has no future value for the build) to acquire future value. Not sure why Canuck fans prefer to trade guys only after they lose all value

Do you know the difference between a slut and a whore?

A slut will f*ck everyone in town, a whore will f*ck everyone in town (except you)
- VanHockeyGuy

Lol. I’m borrowing this

Those 2 are my least fav options of the guys I wouldn’t mind... Starting to realize there might not be a scenario where I’d be happy with Seider being our 1st round haul despite him being my 2nd ranked Dman. I much prefer the forwards this year.
- DrChristianTroy

I do as well and logic suggests BPA, but we need D.

Trade to 11-14?

I’m a whore for using current value (that has no future value for the build) to acquire future value. Not sure why Canuck fans prefer to trade guys only after they lose all value
- DrChristianTroy

That’s the Canucks way. We are too old to change now

Yup, and that's one position we're okay with depth wise.
- VanHockeyGuy

Agreed, but if a Binington can win, I would sacrifce the goalie depth for the forward firepower. We have Dipetro. Draft another goalie 2nd /3rd round and develop.
#asset management
#asset management not a banned term...

Agreed, but if a Binington can win, I would sacrifce the goalie depth for the forward firepower. We have Dipetro. Draft another goalie 2nd /3rd round and develop.
#asset management
#asset management not a banned term...
- carsonagenic

Draft Konovalov.

Agreed, but if a Binington can win, I would sacrifce the goalie depth for the forward firepower. We have Dipetro. Draft another goalie 2nd /3rd round and develop.
#asset management
#asset management not a banned term...
- carsonagenic

absolutely

Draft Konovalov.
- DrChristianTroy

You are correct Sir!

Its being heavily reported that Edmonton is leaning towards Broberg at 8.....
- chompsey

Agreed, but if a Binington can win, I would sacrifce the goalie depth for the forward firepower. We have Dipetro. Draft another goalie 2nd /3rd round and develop.
#asset management
#asset management not a banned term...
- carsonagenic

We also have that Thiessen kid that we drafted as well. Don't know how he's progressing though.

Same thoughts on Markstrom, but would Florida want him back? Thats why I went Demko.
- carsonagenic

Carolina might want him.

Agreed, but if a Binington can win, I would sacrifce the goalie depth for the forward firepower. We have Dipetro. Draft another goalie 2nd /3rd round and develop.
#asset management
#asset management not a banned term...
- carsonagenic

YES IT IS! Get that poop out of here! Because I like you, you get 1 warning! Next time, it will rain down obscenities and patented chompsey insults...

Again

JAY JANOWER
@JayJanower
It’s my understanding that Milan Lucic’s situation in Edmonton is currently being figured out...no secret that Canucks have and continue to express interest in acquiring Lucic.

We also have that Thiessen kid that we drafted as well. Don't know how he's progressing though.
- 93Nucks

Slowed down with an off season, and he was a 7th round flier...

Again

JAY JANOWER
@JayJanower
It’s my understanding that Milan Lucic’s situation in Edmonton is currently being figured out...no secret that Canucks have and continue to express interest in acquiring Lucic.
- VanHockeyGuy

Lucic, Puljujarvi for Sutter, Eriksson - who says no?

Carolina might want him.
- golfingsince

True, but the higher end forwards are gone by 28. Thats into the dman drafting zone, which we do kinda have a need for...