Thats bang on & i’ve looked at that also. When i dream of a Panarin that’s what is behind it all & he is legit elite that do not come around often. Rare a winger can drive the play & exactly what we need.
- Nighthawk

Extremely rare. I would back up the bus for him, his production the last three years is top 10 in the league. Super consistent and I have no doubt would bring Boeser ad EP to new levels. I'd offer 6x10 mill. BUT. Then you've sent a precedent and EP/QH could both demand a lot.

https://www.nhltraderumor...mor-erik-karlsson-to.html

More rumors to agitate the masses.

Don don't read this . I am concerned about your blood pressure

Extremely rare. I would back up the bus for him, his production the last three years is top 10 in the league. Super consistent and I have no doubt would bring Boeser ad EP to new levels. I'd offer 6x10 mill.
- neem55

Body of work & helps the PP & 5v5.
Yes back up the bus

https://www.nhltraderumors.me/2019/06/nhl-trade-rumor-erik-karlsson-to.html

More rumors to agitate the masses.

Don don't read this . I am concerned about your blood pressure
- VANTEL

I mean, it really doesn't offer much of real meat other than they plan on meeting with him. So do 25-26 other teams I'd imagine.

Body of work & helps the PP & 5v5.
Yes back up the bus
- Nighthawk

I'd prefer him to Karlsson too, I wouldn't hate Karlsson but a lot more risk there. Panarin has been one of the most consistant guys in the league since he came to the NHL.

I mean, it really doesn't offer much of real meat other than they plan on meeting with him. So do 25-26 other teams I'd imagine.
- neem55

NHL rumors I don't trust but I do trust the Fourth Period as a reliable source. Freidman also said Canucks were one of the four front runners.

Would you prefer 4 years of Karlsson or Edler? I know most will say neither but I doubt the Canucks would agree.

NHL rumors I don't trust but I do trust the Fourth Period as a reliable source. Freidman also said Canucks were one of the four front runners.

Would you prefer 4 years of Karlsson or Edler? I know most will say neither but I doubt the Canucks would agree.
- VANTEL

Neither is a poor choice to put it politely when those same ppl don’t suggest replacements that are better.

Neither is a poor choice to put it politely when those same ppl don’t suggest replacements that are better.
- Nighthawk

I won't get into the last part everyone is entitled to their own opinion. .

If you are starting to move on some players like Edler Hutton Sutter Ericksson and Tanev then both could be an option.

It is very unlikely that both sign here but the list of players just mentioned will be moved sooner or later.

NHL rumors I don't trust but I do trust the Fourth Period as a reliable source. Freidman also said Canucks were one of the four front runners.

Would you prefer 4 years of Karlsson or Edler? I know most will say neither but I doubt the Canucks would agree.
- VANTEL

I don’t think any team would complain about 4 years of EK

It’s the 7 years at 10 mill per season that scare some fans

I won't get into the last part everyone is entitled to their own opinion. .

If you are starting to move on some players like Edler Hutton Sutter Ericksson and Tanev then both could be an option.

It is very unlikely that both sign here but the list of players just mentioned will be moved sooner or later.
- VANTEL

1 is better than neither.

I don’t think any team would complain about 4 years of EK

It’s the 7 years at 10 mill per season that scare some fans
- Redmile247

I can see Panarin getting long term . Karlsson I doubt will get long term.

So much for an exciting game

I fully understand someone not like having Beagle and Sutter together. I really do agree with you guys on that. You can make a shut down line of Sutter Beagle but it is a little extravagant . I think BS will be moved sometime this year either at the draft or TDL.
- VANTEL

Nature of the beast with this club. So many injuries year after year and Sutter is one of them Beagle is more than capable. Hopefully Sutter is gone this year.

So much for an exciting game
- VANTEL

Not watching it but I heard STL is being outplayed badly and got jobbed on a missed off side call for Boston's third goal. Gary loves him some Bruins!

So much for an exciting game
- VANTEL

Wait until the 3rd when they start hacking each other and we get some line brawls

So much for an exciting game
- VANTEL

Blues style bores me

Nature of the beast with this club. So many injuries year after year and Sutter is one of them Beagle is more than capable. Hopefully Sutter is gone this year.
- LordHumungous

Yup.

Said it last year play with the puck in the other end and the injury list won't be as long

https://www.nhltraderumors.me/2019/06/nhl-trade-rumor-erik-karlsson-to.html

More rumors to agitate the masses.

Don don't read this . I am concerned about your blood pressure
- VANTEL

Awesome news

I don’t think any team would complain about 4 years of EK

It’s the 7 years at 10 mill per season that scare some fans
- Redmile247

It depends on how his contract would be structured, if it’s not buyout proof and its as front loaded as much as the CBA allows, having him would be awesome.

I don’t think any team would complain about 4 years of EK

It’s the 7 years at 10 mill per season that scare some fans
- Redmile247

Doubt Karlsson would take 4 years. First year or two would be fine but after that the contract would be a nightmare.

No thanks.

Doubt Karlsson would take 4 years. First year or two would be fine but after that the contract would be a nightmare.

No thanks.
- LordHumungous

With his injury history a team would be nuts to go long term

With his injury history a team would be nuts to go long term
- VANTEL

For sure.

He'll get you 60+ points as a dman but be -40 doing it.

No way.

https://www.nhltraderumors.me/2019/06/nhl-trade-rumor-erik-karlsson-to.html

More rumors to agitate the masses.

Don don't read this . I am concerned about your blood pressure
- VANTEL

They mention about PK's attitude, in that article, how about Karlson's attitude.
He tore a strip out of his defense partner after a goal, because Karlson cont play defense worth (frank), so he blames the other guy.
Was he liked in the dressing room in Ottawa, or San Jose, for that matter.
No (frank)en thanks to Karlson signing.

They mention about PK's attitude, in that article, how about Karlson's attitude.
He tore a strip out of his defense partner after a goal, because Karlson cont play defense worth (frank), so he blames the other guy.
Was he liked in the dressing room in Ottawa, or San Jose, for that matter.
No (frank)en thanks to Karlson signing.
- Reubenkincade

I don't think I am for it. I am just showing what is being said. I am leaning towards no.

They mention about PK's attitude, in that article, how about Karlson's attitude.
He tore a strip out of his defense partner after a goal, because Karlson cont play defense worth (frank), so he blames the other guy.
Was he liked in the dressing room in Ottawa, or San Jose, for that matter.
No (frank)en thanks to Karlson signing.
- Reubenkincade

How do you know what goes on in the locker room?