An interesting comparison. Luongo will likely be a first ballot hofer, for sure HOF goalie the only one ever from Vancouver. The best goalie weve ever had, by far. Similarly, Karlsson would be the best offensive dman weve ever had, not even close and likely will be a first ballot hofer as well. Good comparison, but not in the way intended it. Karlsson is a defensive liability, but also is easily a top3 offensive dman in the league. While Luongo's contract is terrible, doesn't actually take away from how good he was. I do hope we don't go crazy on Karlsson, but even with Hughes he still fills a huge need on the powerplay/right side. Also, how fun would that powerplay be with EK, QH, EP, BB and BO. Put both offensive guys with solid defenders 5v5. Yes EK continues to be a defensive liability, but he does play with a lot of heart and is a proven playoff guy. Still prefer Panarin, but that's my opinion. For the record, I don't think Karlson should have ever got a Norris, but to deny the offensive advantage he brings is full on stupidity.
- neem55
Boeser & EP40 have changed the outlook for the Canucks, and hopefully Hughes will contribute to that trend next year. Having EK, even at an overpayment, would be a similarly huge boost. Iād much rather watch EK than any combo of LE, BS, Hutton, Beagle or Stetcher. Play him with Tanev as a complimentary player whose defensive style allows EK to rove, and with EP, BB and BH on the power play + OT.
Yes, in 4 years the contract might suck. Iād take that over contracts that already suck for players who suck the life out of the game.
