Gudas? PASS!

Buddy look at the cap. They have 11 million to sign 9 players. Including Marner (10-11 Mil), Kap ( bridge 2-3 years around 3-4) and Johnsson ( bridge 2-3 years around 2-3).
So best case is 15 million for those players and league minmum for the other 5 puts you at 20 million. which is 9 million over the cap.

You add Gudas 3.35 million next year and then they will have to get rid of 12 million and have three rookies/ entry level players on defense.

You think both Kapanen and Johnsson are both going to sign bridge deals? If I was Kapanen, I’d laugh and walk out. Johnsson doesn’t have the leverage Kappy does, but there is no way he is taking 2-3 on a bridge either. That’s wishful thinking.
- Hokeeguy9

Exactly!!!!!! I was doing best case for leaf fans.

6-3-1

You guys already planned it in August.
- Cptmjl

Brootal.

Buddy look at the cap. They have 11 million to sign 9 players. Including Marner (10-11 Mil), Kap ( bridge 2-3 years around 3-4) and Johnsson ( bridge 2-3 years around 2-3).
So best case is 15 million for those players and league minmum for the other 5 puts you at 20 million. which is 9 million over the cap.

You add Gudas 3.35 million next year and then they will have to get rid of 12 million and have three rookies/ entry level players on defense.

You think both Kapanen and Johnsson are both going to sign bridge deals? If I was Kapanen, I’d laugh and walk out. Johnsson doesn’t have the leverage Kappy does, but there is no way he is taking 2-3 on a bridge either. That’s wishful thinking.
- Hokeeguy9

You guys are probably the same people that complain that the Leafs get too much media coverage.

Exactly!!!!!! I was doing best case for leaf fans.
- BigDog912

Leafs will be fine.

1. No Gardiner. No cash, no chance.

2a. If we can move Marleau then that is that.

2b. Can't move Marleau, probably Brown and Johnson gone.

The Flyers are still not in seller mode I am told...

They should be

I used 83 mil cap in my calcs. they have 72 million committed next year. and it will cost more then 15 million for those three. That was best case. So if you get rid of Horton contract then you will have 1.4 million to sign 6 more players.
- BigDog912

Not including Horton, but including the 3 RFA forwards mentioned, they have 11 forwards, 5 defensemen and 1 goaltender under contract for next year.

Really they need to find a way to shed a couple million in salary for next season and then they should be fine assuming some of the kids are ready.

Perhaps you mean circumvent?

Not including Horton, but including the 3 RFA forwards mentioned, they have 11 forwards, 5 defensemen and 1 goaltender under contract for next year.

Really they need to find a way to shed a couple million in salary for next season and then they should be fine assuming some of the kids are ready.
- BINGO!

HockeyBuzz math is my favorite kind of math.

Not including Horton, but including the 3 RFA forwards mentioned, they have 11 forwards, 5 defensemen and 1 goaltender under contract for next year.

Really they need to find a way to shed a couple million in salary for next season and then they should be fine assuming some of the kids are ready.
- BINGO!

They have 11 million to sign 9 players 3 of which will cost 15- 20 million. They need to shed 10 million+ next year.

Eklund: Dubas on Gudas? Jackets/Duchene? Isles/Brassard? Simmonds Staying? Buzz@1
- Eklund

If Keka does the old switcherou , Panarin plus for Duschene then Ottawa deals Panarin for more assets I will laugh at the Panthers

They have 11 million to sign 9 players 3 of which will cost 15- 20 million. They need to shed 10 million+ next year.
- BigDog912

They have 11 million to sign 9 players 3 of which will cost 15- 20 million. They need to shed 10 million+ next year.
- BigDog912

Are you trolling or are you actually this stupid?

They have 11 million to sign 9 players 3 of which will cost 15- 20 million. They need to shed 10 million+ next year.
- BigDog912

u dum

They have 11 million to sign 9 players 3 of which will cost 15- 20 million. They need to shed 10 million+ next year.
- BigDog912

There's no rule that says they have to carry 23 players on the active roster every night, especially with the Marlies in the same city.

[quote=Deeps27]You guys are probably the same people that complain that the Leafs get too much shallow and hollow media coverage. All those shallow articles on Sportnet is written by shallow 15 year old bandwagon fans. Who was not Leaf fans during the BallHard years.


HONEST!

HockeyBuzz math is my favorite kind of math.
- Feds91Stammer

On par with George Double W sugar Bush.

On par with George Double W sugar Bush.
- Landsbergfan

There's no rule that says they have to carry 23 players on the active roster every night, especially with the Marlies in the same city.
- BINGO!

Is this you?

https://nationalpost.com/...e0-471b-acc3-581861553eb9

There's no rule that says they have to carry 23 players on the active roster every night, especially with the Marlies in the same city.
- BINGO!

Gardiner and Marleau out, we keep everybody else including resigning Hainsey.

or

Gardiner, Johnson, Hainsey and possibly Brown out.

unless miracles happen and Zaitsev disappears.

Gudas? Better looking beard than Muffins yellow!!!
- Njuice

Gardiner and Marleau out, we keep everybody else including resigning Hainsey.

or

Gardiner, Johnson, Hainsey and possibly Brown out.

unless miracles happen and Zaitsev disappears.
- Njuice

How you getting rid of Marleau?

Is this you?

https://nationalpost.com/...e0-471b-acc3-581861553eb9
- Feds91Stammer

If only.

How you getting rid of Marleau?
- Feds91Stammer

He ain't going anywhere unless he wins that cup.

Are you trolling or are you actually this stupid?
- poopstash

Someone please explain to me. How they dont need to shed 10 million plus.

11 in cap room if cap goes to 83 million.
marner 10.5 mil
kap 4.5 mil
Johnsson 2.5 mil
Backup goalie 2mil
3-4 entry level or vet min dman 6.5 mil
1-2 entry level forwards forwards 2 mil
That is 28 million needed with only 11 in cap room. So 17 million needed to shed