Wanna blog? Start your own hockey blog with My HockeyBuzz. Register for free today!
 
Forums :: Blog World :: Justin Lowe: Are You Sure You Want the Blackhawks to Make the Playoffs?
Author Message
nickmo2699
Chicago Blackhawks
Location: IL
Joined: 01.06.2012

Feb 14 @ 3:08 PM ET
We're not giving you Williams for AA.

We're in a goddamn playoff race and he's the Captain.

- BINGO!


That's what I said. AA for a free raid at the broken stick bin! #e5
Savetheembers33
Chicago Blackhawks
Location: Chicago, IL
Joined: 01.23.2017

Feb 14 @ 3:09 PM ET
We're not giving you Williams for AA.

We're in a goddamn playoff race and he's the Captain.

- BINGO!


Chill out. It was a suggestion. I doubt he even knew Williams was the captain and that's why he suggested it
I Am The Breadman
Chicago Blackhawks
Location: Richton Park, IL
Joined: 09.16.2018

Feb 14 @ 3:10 PM ET
We're not giving you Williams for AA.

We're in a goddamn playoff race and he's the Captain.

- BINGO!


But we fleece you all the time ... it's kind of our thing.
BINGO!
Carolina Hurricanes
Location: I'll always remember the last words my grandfather ever told me. He said, "A Truck!", SK
Joined: 09.21.2009

Feb 14 @ 3:11 PM ET
Question on Faulk: Has his game fallen off, or is this so they can loosen up the log jam of D prospects they have in the fold?
- nickmo2699


Both. Adam Fox won't sign unless he can play in the NHL right away.

Biggest thing is opening up space on the RHD side and acquiring a top 6 forward.

Not interested in taking any defensemen back.
BINGO!
Carolina Hurricanes
Location: I'll always remember the last words my grandfather ever told me. He said, "A Truck!", SK
Joined: 09.21.2009

Feb 14 @ 3:13 PM ET
Chill out. It was a suggestion. I doubt he even knew Williams was the captain and that's why he suggested it
- Savetheembers33


I wasn't meaning to be rude. But, I mean, Williams is more productive than AA too, so...
z1990z
Chicago Blackhawks
Location: NW USA
Joined: 02.09.2012

Feb 14 @ 3:14 PM ET
Both. Adam Fox won't sign unless he can play in the NHL right away.

Biggest thing is opening up space on the RHD side and acquiring a top 6 forward.

Not interested in taking any defensemen back.

- BINGO!


I would like TVR back. Guy aint flashy, but he plays a solid stay at home game. Hawks could use some consistent/simple on D.
LAHawk
Chicago Blackhawks
Joined: 11.02.2017

Feb 14 @ 3:16 PM ET
We're not giving you Williams for AA.

We're in a goddamn playoff race and he's the Captain.

- BINGO!


He also has a NMC
nickmo2699
Chicago Blackhawks
Location: IL
Joined: 01.06.2012

Feb 14 @ 3:16 PM ET
I would like TVR back. Guy aint flashy, but he plays a solid stay at home game. Hawks could use some consistent/simple on D.
- z1990z


Agreed!
BINGO!
Carolina Hurricanes
Location: I'll always remember the last words my grandfather ever told me. He said, "A Truck!", SK
Joined: 09.21.2009

Feb 14 @ 3:16 PM ET
But we fleece you all the time ... it's kind of our thing.
- I Am The Breadman





.............?
I Am The Breadman
Chicago Blackhawks
Location: Richton Park, IL
Joined: 09.16.2018

Feb 14 @ 3:18 PM ET
.............?
- BINGO!


Awhile ago, some blog said we always fleece you guys when we trade with you. Personally, I don't see it. Just making a joke.
LAHawk
Chicago Blackhawks
Joined: 11.02.2017

Feb 14 @ 3:23 PM ET
Both. Adam Fox won't sign unless he can play in the NHL right away.

Biggest thing is opening up space on the RHD side and acquiring a top 6 forward.

Not interested in taking any defensemen back.

- BINGO!


We have a logjam of #5,6,7 defenseman also, why would we want another one at $2.3mil?
BINGO!
Carolina Hurricanes
Location: I'll always remember the last words my grandfather ever told me. He said, "A Truck!", SK
Joined: 09.21.2009

Feb 14 @ 3:30 PM ET
We have a logjam of #5,6,7 defenseman also, why would we want another one at $2.3mil?
- LAHawk


I hear ya. This proposal was about Faulk though, who is a lot of things but is certainly a top 4 defenseman.
pdx2ord
Chicago Blackhawks
Location: Portland, OR
Joined: 09.02.2015

Feb 14 @ 3:34 PM ET
Please take him. He's not even with the AHL team anymore. They granted him a "personal leave of absence"
- BINGO!


Does the player get paid during LoAs?
Savetheembers33
Chicago Blackhawks
Location: Chicago, IL
Joined: 01.23.2017

Feb 14 @ 3:37 PM ET
I hear ya. This proposal was about Faulk though, who is a lot of things but is certainly a top 4 defenseman.
- BINGO!


Only problem I see is the fact that the Hawks seem to have a bit of a logjam of RHD ourselves and could use a LHD who plays solid D. Can Faulk play his offside? Brett Pesce seems to fit the mold more of what we need on this team, but again another RHD.

Honestly, knowing Bowman I wouldn't be surprised if they did something like AA and Forsling for TVR and a prospect +.

BONUS: AA, Forsling, and Forsberg for TVR, Darling (50% retained), and two prospects OR a prospect and a pick

BINGO!
Carolina Hurricanes
Location: I'll always remember the last words my grandfather ever told me. He said, "A Truck!", SK
Joined: 09.21.2009

Feb 14 @ 3:38 PM ET
Does the player get paid during LoAs?
- pdx2ord


I think so, yeah. He's not suspended, so he should still be being paid.
Elbows15
Chicago Blackhawks
Location: I was going to do the math on this but I don't think it will help., IL
Joined: 08.04.2013

Feb 14 @ 3:40 PM ET
It doesn't cost them anything to sign Perlini to a deal that can be buried in Rockford, aside from a contract slot. If he's playing hurt, as some on here contend is the case, we should see what he's like at 100% before placing him on waivers. He was the scratch off ticket included in the Schmaltz/Strome deal, that's how I look at it.
- 333inthe3rd

Only one person contends he is playing hurt. At this point, he isn't worth a contract slot. He is a lazy player.
Elbows15
Chicago Blackhawks
Location: I was going to do the math on this but I don't think it will help., IL
Joined: 08.04.2013

Feb 14 @ 3:41 PM ET
Awhile ago, some blog said we always fleece you guys when we trade with you. Personally, I don't see it. Just making a joke.
- I Am The Breadman

Never explain yourself to that guy.
BINGO!
Carolina Hurricanes
Location: I'll always remember the last words my grandfather ever told me. He said, "A Truck!", SK
Joined: 09.21.2009

Feb 14 @ 3:41 PM ET
Only problem I see is the fact that the Hawks seem to have a bit of a logjam of RHD ourselves and could use a LHD who plays solid D. Can Faulk play his offside? Brett Pesce seems to fit the mold more of what we need on this team, but again another RHD.

Honestly, knowing Bowman I wouldn't be surprised if they did something like AA and Forsling for TVR and a prospect +.

BONUS: AA, Forsling, and Forsberg for TVR, Darling (50% retained), and two prospects OR a prospect and a pick


- Savetheembers33



Pesce's playing his offside with Faulk right now, actually.
I Am The Breadman
Chicago Blackhawks
Location: Richton Park, IL
Joined: 09.16.2018

Feb 14 @ 3:43 PM ET
Never explain yourself to that guy.
- Elbows15


Hahahaha, noted.
Savetheembers33
Chicago Blackhawks
Location: Chicago, IL
Joined: 01.23.2017

Feb 14 @ 3:47 PM ET
Pesce's playing his offside with Faulk right now, actually.
- BINGO!


Lmao I knew one of them had to be playing their offside with like 5 RHD on the roster already

I could see something around Pesce for AA. Makes sense for both sides. Pesce is a bit more of a Defensive D-Man (from what I've read, you might know more) and would fit what we are looking for. AA adds more Top 9 Forward depth for your Playoff push. Both are signed for about the same amount of money (AA for about 500k more). Could even see something expanded to maybe include Forsling to balance out the backend for you guys and we receive a forward prospect in return (perhaps some of the Center depth where we need more depth like Roy).

Then still leaves the possibly of trading Faulk at some point for a Top 6 Forward and open up roster spots for both Fox and Bean. Just throwing pasta against the wall to see what sticks
Davewn
Chicago Blackhawks
Location: West Des Moines, IA
Joined: 12.16.2015

Feb 14 @ 3:50 PM ET
Only problem I see is the fact that the Hawks seem to have a bit of a logjam of RHD ourselves and could use a LHD who plays solid D. Can Faulk play his offside? Brett Pesce seems to fit the mold more of what we need on this team, but again another RHD.

Honestly, knowing Bowman I wouldn't be surprised if they did something like AA and Forsling for TVR and a prospect +.

BONUS: AA, Forsling, and Forsberg for TVR, Darling (50% retained), and two prospects OR a prospect and a pick


- Savetheembers33



Toss in Bickell and maybe you have something there...What is people's fascination with picking up former Blackhawks? With the exception of possibly Versteeg, none of the retreads have made a positive impact whatsoever. TVR is just a guy and is overpaid for a bottom pair defenseman and redundant for a team loaded with 6-7-8s. Darling has literally been the worst goalie in the NHL since he was traded from Chicago. A bid no thanks to either.

Edited to add (not aimed at you), but there was a reason all these guys are now former Blackhawks.
BINGO!
Carolina Hurricanes
Location: I'll always remember the last words my grandfather ever told me. He said, "A Truck!", SK
Joined: 09.21.2009

Feb 14 @ 3:52 PM ET
Lmao I knew one of them had to be playing their offside with like 5 RHD on the roster already

I could see something around Pesce for AA. Makes sense for both sides. Pesce is a bit more of a Defensive D-Man (from what I've read, you might know more) and would fit what we are looking for. AA adds more Top 9 Forward depth for your Playoff push. Both are signed for about the same amount of money (AA for about 500k more). Could even see something expanded to maybe include Forsling to balance out the backend for you guys and we receive a forward prospect in return (perhaps some of the Center depth where we need more depth like Roy).

Then still leaves the possibly of trading Faulk at some point for a Top 6 Forward and open up roster spots for both Fox and Bean. Just throwing pasta against the wall to see what sticks

- Savetheembers33

Pesce's unlikely to go anywhere, I think.

When it comes to the guys most likely to be traded it goes:

TVR
Faulk
Hamilton
Pesce
Tyler Cameron
Season Ticket Holder
Chicago Blackhawks
Location: Toronto, ON
Joined: 10.31.2017

Feb 14 @ 4:09 PM ET
I had no idea so many people weren't big fans of JJ. I think they both bring different positives to the group. I do feel JJ has more sources and rumor updates while JL just reports what he hears from JJ.

That's not a knock JL, you have done a fantastic job with your insights and team outlook!

- nickmo2699


No knock taken, Nickmo.

I review and chat to a lot of people (JJ included) regarding rumours and happenings.

After working in the sports industry in Toronto for so long, I do have some of contacts myself.

I check in from time to time but don't focus my writing around it, rather would prefer to spark conversations amongst you great people.
BetweenTheDots
Chicago Blackhawks
Location: IL
Joined: 06.13.2015

Feb 14 @ 4:10 PM ET
Well supposedly Stan is looking to only do deals that he considers helping the Hawks, TVR doesn't do that, even with dumping Anisimov's salary
- LAHawk


Hmmm? Present or future, if true draft picks would be nice
Ron Swanson
Chicago Blackhawks
Location: You had me at 'Meat Tornado', IL
Joined: 02.14.2019

Feb 14 @ 4:11 PM ET
Who do you think Stan can make a trade with using Forsling and perlini as a change of scereny trade similar to Koekkoek and drake trades
- Abadseed


Greetings Hawks fans. New guy here (but I've been reading for several years)...

I've been thinking a lot about the off-season and what SB might be able to do to improve this roster. I think using Hayden, Forsling, and even Gus as trade chips makes much more sense then as opposed to now. Looking at both Tampa Bay and Toronto- both are tight up against the cap and will need low-cost players to fill out their rosters.

I'm hoping Stan can pry Andreas Johnsson or (less likely) Kapanen from the Leafs, or maybe JT Miller from the Bolts in exchange for some picks, low-cost players, and/or taking on expensive contracts (Callahan?). Thoughts?
Page: Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32  Next