Wanna blog? Start your own hockey blog with My HockeyBuzz. Register for free today!
 
Forums :: Blog World :: Michael Pachla: Back on the ice at Columbus
Author Message
Sabre_Tooth
Buffalo Sabres
Location: We're all Duane, NE
Joined: 06.17.2015

Jan 29 @ 2:29 PM ET
(frank) IT! CRAPPO FOR KAKKO!
RippedFuel
Buffalo Sabres
Joined: 11.01.2016

Jan 29 @ 2:30 PM ET
If we keep the Sharks pick maybe we're lucky enough to have another Thompson 3 years from now
- mattmoulson


YAY!!! Then three years after that he will be a good 3rd line penalty killer
jdfitz77
Buffalo Sabres
Location: buffalo, NY
Joined: 05.21.2007

Jan 29 @ 2:31 PM ET
SO we are just ignoring the two other first round picks they have where the Sabres can both get Schenn now and a Schenn later, like you say?

SO who is keeping the window short, because right now the Sabres are not even close, next year marginal improvement, still not even close.
So three years out we have all the prospects ready to come up, and maybe make a difference?

- ImThatGuy


And it took Schenn 5 years to become a 20goal scorer,
and even longer to develop into the good 2C he is today

Meanwhile,
Ppl are acting like whoever we draft in the mid-late 1st will be helping us in 2 years

Mittelstadt was a great prospect,
and he’s not helping us 2 years later
ImThatGuy
Buffalo Sabres
Location: I AM MY OWN DAMN SOURCE!, NY
Joined: 11.04.2010

Jan 29 @ 2:31 PM ET
100% agreed.

No point in trading for expensive 28/29 year olds.

- SabreWest



Agreed this team should never try to get better.

never try to upgrade with actual NHL talent.

Even when this team is gunning for the cup, if Botteril trades a first round pick like Dubas just did, we should all go down to Key Bank and murder him.

First round picks are F(_*^ gold!!!
First round pick > Chance at cup.
Lunaion
Joined: 05.23.2016

Jan 29 @ 2:33 PM ET
so youre willing to wait another 10 huh??
- RippedFuel


Not sure how you get that. You want to go all in this year at the expense of the next 10 years. They aren't there yet, not even close.

RippedFuel
Buffalo Sabres
Joined: 11.01.2016

Jan 29 @ 2:33 PM ET
And it took Schenn 5 years to become a 20goal scorer,
and even longer to develop into the good 2C he is today

Meanwhile,
Ppl are acting like whoever we draft in the mid-late 1st will be helping us in 2 years

Mittelstadt was a great prospect,
and he’s not helping us 2 years later

- jdfitz77


lets not even talk about Nylander….or Dal Colle....or Dylan Strome
ImThatGuy
Buffalo Sabres
Location: I AM MY OWN DAMN SOURCE!, NY
Joined: 11.04.2010

Jan 29 @ 2:34 PM ET
And it took Schenn 5 years to become a 20goal scorer,
and even longer to develop into the good 2C he is today

Meanwhile,
Ppl are acting like whoever we draft in the mid-late 1st will be helping us in 2 years

Mittelstadt was a great prospect,
and he’s not helping us 2 years later

- jdfitz77


There is no guarantee Middlestadt gets there either.
jdfitz77
Buffalo Sabres
Location: buffalo, NY
Joined: 05.21.2007

Jan 29 @ 2:35 PM ET
Then provide an example of a player who would cost a total insignificant draft pick between 20-27 straight up?

Or are we adding pieces to further hurt our depth?

What really good player that isn’t late twenties is only going to cost a late-first ?

- sbroads24


Well, Skinner cost less then that, so....
ImThatGuy
Buffalo Sabres
Location: I AM MY OWN DAMN SOURCE!, NY
Joined: 11.04.2010

Jan 29 @ 2:35 PM ET
If Philly comes in and says give me 1st, 3rd and one of Nylander/Guhle/Thompson for Couts

I do it all day every day.
RippedFuel
Buffalo Sabres
Joined: 11.01.2016

Jan 29 @ 2:37 PM ET
Not sure how you get that. You want to go all in this year at the expense of the next 10 years. They aren't there yet, not even close.
- Lunaion


no, I don't want to go "all in"....I would like to take assets that have an unknown value in the future, non lottery picks...and trade them for available KNOWN assets that upgrade glaring holes our team now. We have a lot of the needed requrements satisfied right now...TRUE #1C TRUE #1D. Quality 2-4 D. #1 wingers that would work well with the #1 C (53 and 23).

We DESPERATELY NEED 2nd line forwards and I would not like to waste anymore year of the true 1C we tanked 2-3 years to get...in the hopes that we MIGHT hit a bullseye with a blindfold on when picking 22nd with the sharks pick
RippedFuel
Buffalo Sabres
Joined: 11.01.2016

Jan 29 @ 2:37 PM ET
If Philly comes in and says give me 1st, 3rd and one of Nylander/Guhle/Thompson for Couts

I do it all day every day.

- ImThatGuy



me too.....and Id even up that farther for Duschene
jdfitz77
Buffalo Sabres
Location: buffalo, NY
Joined: 05.21.2007

Jan 29 @ 2:40 PM ET
[quote=sbroads24]

Ppl sure are acting like ALL the 1sts will work out

Otherwise,
there shouldn’t be such an objection to trading for a player we already KNOW is good...
instead of just HOPING the guy we choose will develop into a good player in 3-5 YEARS,
if ever
seedy
Buffalo Sabres
Location: you don't need an ignore button to ignore someone., CA
Joined: 02.22.2007

Jan 29 @ 2:40 PM ET
If Philly comes in and says give me 1st, 3rd and one of Nylander/Guhle/Thompson for Couts

I do it all day every day.

- ImThatGuy


Thats because this makes sense. No one really thinks we should trade ALL 4 first rounders except for a few lunatics. if a competent 2nd line center is available and part of the package for him is one of our first rounders, it a no brainer.
Lunaion
Joined: 05.23.2016

Jan 29 @ 2:41 PM ET
no, I don't want to go "all in"....I would like to take assets that have an unknown value in the future, non lottery picks...and trade them for available KNOWN assets that upgrade glaring holes our team now. We have a lot of the needed requrements satisfied right now...TRUE #1C TRUE #1D. Quality 2-4 D. #1 wingers that would work well with the #1 C (53 and 23).

We DESPERATELY NEED 2nd line forwards and I would not like to waste anymore year of the true 1C we tanked 2-3 years to get...in the hopes that we MIGHT hit a bullseye with a blindfold on when picking 22nd with the sharks pick

- RippedFuel


You've suggested trading all 3 1st's. If that's not going all in to you, not sure what to say.

You can't turn this team into a contender with deadline moves. It's not that close.
jdfitz77
Buffalo Sabres
Location: buffalo, NY
Joined: 05.21.2007

Jan 29 @ 2:48 PM ET
If Philly comes in and says give me 1st, 3rd and one of Nylander/Guhle/Thompson for Couts

I do it all day every day.

- ImThatGuy


We can’t do that
The 1st will end up being Pasternak
The 3rd will be Brayden Point
And Nylander/Guhle/Thompson are future
All-Stars
ImThatGuy
Buffalo Sabres
Location: I AM MY OWN DAMN SOURCE!, NY
Joined: 11.04.2010

Jan 29 @ 2:48 PM ET
me too.....and Id even up that farther for Duschene
- RippedFuel


Duchene shouldnt cost as much being a pending UFA.

I don't think you would have to give up more.
RippedFuel
Buffalo Sabres
Joined: 11.01.2016

Jan 29 @ 2:49 PM ET
Im not looking to turn it into a cup contender...Im looking to turn it AWAY from another 11th place finish in the East...which is coming.

hey...we disagree....youre ok with not making the playoffs for 10 years on the pipe dream that 3 15-25 draft picks are going to step right in and lead us to the cup...

Id take a different approach

and again..Id absolutely trade those 3 picks for a resigned reasonable Duchene.

Eichel (22-28) and Duchene (28-34) over Eichel and 3 18-24 2nd level prospects....yep...

RippedFuel
Buffalo Sabres
Joined: 11.01.2016

Jan 29 @ 2:51 PM ET
Duchene shouldnt cost as much being a pending UFA.

I don't think you would have to give up more.

- ImThatGuy


I wouldn't trade for Duchene as a rental....when I speak of him, its with a new contract for him
sbroads24
Buffalo Sabres
Location: We are in 30th place. It's 2017 , NY
Joined: 02.12.2012

Jan 29 @ 2:52 PM ET
[quote=jdfitz77]
The point I’m making isn’t that all these picks will turn out, it’s that we need to maximize our chances of hitting by using them.

We absolutely NEED to fill the cupboards with cheap skill in the next few years, otherwise we will be trading away the same guys people want to trade for.

Tampa, WPG, NSH etc ALL have homegrown picks playing for cheap and playing big roles because of drafting and developing.

It’s not that trading the 24th pick for Brayden Schenn wouldn’t or can’t be a win for us, it’s that what we need is more than just a Brayden Schenn
RippedFuel
Buffalo Sabres
Joined: 11.01.2016

Jan 29 @ 2:52 PM ET
We can’t do that
The 1st will end up being Pasternak
The 3rd will be Brayden Point
And Nylander/Guhle/Thompson are future
All-Stars

- jdfitz77


Tom Brady was a 6th
RippedFuel
Buffalo Sabres
Joined: 11.01.2016

Jan 29 @ 2:54 PM ET
[quote=sbroads24]

we need a 2nd line center....Brayden Schenn is a 2nd line Center....

the 22nd second pick in the 2019 draft MIGHT be a second line center...in 2023...

hmmmmm...sounds pretty easy...


ImThatGuy
Buffalo Sabres
Location: I AM MY OWN DAMN SOURCE!, NY
Joined: 11.04.2010

Jan 29 @ 2:54 PM ET
Honestly if Duchene hits UFA.

I offer him a 7*9 deal to be the 2nd line center.

RippedFuel
Buffalo Sabres
Joined: 11.01.2016

Jan 29 @ 2:55 PM ET
[quote=sbroads24]


we need a second line winger...Mark Stone is a 2nd line winger....

the 18th pick in the 2019 draft MIGHT be a 2nd line winger...in 2023...

Seems pretty easy to me...
sbroads24
Buffalo Sabres
Location: We are in 30th place. It's 2017 , NY
Joined: 02.12.2012

Jan 29 @ 2:56 PM ET
[quote=RippedFuel]
We need a lot of things
jdfitz77
Buffalo Sabres
Location: buffalo, NY
Joined: 05.21.2007

Jan 29 @ 2:57 PM ET

The point I’m making isn’t that all these picks will turn out, it’s that we need to maximize our chances of hitting by using them.

We absolutely NEED to fill the cupboards with cheap skill in the next few years, otherwise we will be trading away the same guys people want to trade for.

Tampa, WPG, NSH etc ALL have homegrown picks playing for cheap and playing big roles because of drafting and developing.

It’s not that trading the 24th pick for Brayden Schenn wouldn’t or can’t be a win for us, it’s that what we need is more than just a Brayden Schenn

- sbroads24


Well who is saying we should ONLY trade for Schenn & do NOTHING ELSE?

Of course there’s more work to be done

But trading for Coyle doesn’t “move the needle” as you like to say?

And while we do need to draft & develop,
we shouldn’t be sitting on our hands wasting 3-5 years of Eichel & Dahlin to figure out which picks will work out & which won’t
Page: Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31  Next