LeftCoaster
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Island City, BC Joined: 07.03.2009
|
|
|
by this same logic we are 7 pts from being 9th overall - onesmallleap
Exactly, everyone makes it out like its such a sure thing the team is legit, it's nonsense. The league has parity. It's a lot easier to fall than it is to rise. |
|
LeftCoaster
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Island City, BC Joined: 07.03.2009
|
|
|
|
|
Idiot, it's guys like you running the team why they've never won a Cup - LeftCoaster
How many cups do you have?
|
|
onesmallleap
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Be Calm n Swede On, BC Joined: 09.23.2015
|
|
|
Exactly, everyone makes it out like its such a sure thing the team is legit, it's nonsense. The league has parity. It's a lot easier to fall than it is to rise. - LeftCoaster
it just as easy for others to fall too |
|
onesmallleap
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Be Calm n Swede On, BC Joined: 09.23.2015
|
|
|
Idiot, it's guys like you running the team why they've never won a Cup - LeftCoaster
NO ur DA IdiOT |
|
|
|
it just as easy for others to fall too - onesmallleap
When Bo Brock and EP score we usually win. We should bench them or ask them not to try so hard.
|
|
onesmallleap
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Be Calm n Swede On, BC Joined: 09.23.2015
|
|
|
onesmallleap
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Be Calm n Swede On, BC Joined: 09.23.2015
|
|
|
When Bo Brock and EP score we usually win. We should bench them or ask them not to try so hard. - VANTEL
that's it , how do we tank and not do harm to what we are building? |
|
LeftCoaster
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Island City, BC Joined: 07.03.2009
|
|
|
How many cups do you have? - VANTEL
another great arguement on your behalf, what are you 14 lol. |
|
LeftCoaster
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Island City, BC Joined: 07.03.2009
|
|
|
it just as easy for others to fall too - onesmallleap
There's certainly an element of luck involved for the teams looking to slide in the standings. |
|
|
|
LeftCoaster
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Island City, BC Joined: 07.03.2009
|
|
|
|
|
onesmallleap
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Be Calm n Swede On, BC Joined: 09.23.2015
|
|
|
You might want to talk to the Trump administration for some pointers - LeftCoaster
i hate that wiener, but my point is you play the games and have a open idea as to the progression of the team , we are better then thought , so now we have to do things that will help build now and in the future , there is nothing wrong in making moves that help the team |
|
onesmallleap
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Be Calm n Swede On, BC Joined: 09.23.2015
|
|
|
lol - Redmile247
lol flames do suck |
|
|
|
lol flames do suck - onesmallleap
K lol |
|
LeftCoaster
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Island City, BC Joined: 07.03.2009
|
|
|
i hate that wiener, but my point is you play the games and have a open idea as to the progression of the team , we are better then thought , so now we have to do things that will help build now and in the future , there is nothing wrong in making moves that help the team - onesmallleap
Sorry I have to work in between my hockey debates lol. I think through 50 games we know what the team is, yes they are better than we thought, Pettersson and Markstrom changed things. However, they're still only ~ a .500 hockey club because they're not exactly very deep at this point.
Yesterday I posted through 50 games last year they were 20-24-6 for 46 points, this year they are better at 23-21-6 for 52 points, they are a mere three wins better than last year even though it feels like they are so much better.
The organization is not in a position to be trading ANY draft picks to reach, they're not, small moves like the Leivo trade, ok, those are good. |
|
onesmallleap
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Be Calm n Swede On, BC Joined: 09.23.2015
|
|
|
Sorry I have to work in between my hockey debates lol. I think through 50 games we know what the team is, yes they are better than we thought, Pettersson and Markstrom changed things. However, they're still only ~ a .500 hockey club because they're not exactly very deep at this point.
Yesterday I posted through 50 games last year they were 20-24-6 for 46 points, this year they are better at 23-21-6 for 52 points, they are a mere three wins better than last year even though it feels like they are so much better.
The organization is not in a position to be trading ANY draft picks to reach, they're not, small moves like the Leivo trade, ok, those are good. - LeftCoaster
draft picks are unknown comodities, that said they are the lifeblood of a team to a point , but we have so many pieces that can be traded and used to change the room so to speak, Goldy, Gradlund ,Bearschi, Schaller, Motte , JV, almost anyone not named EP or Boeser. Even Bo should be an option if the right offer came up.
before the freakout , if columbus offered Werenski for BO ala johannson for Meyers you have to look at that and make a hard choice |
|
bloatedmosquito
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: The Clit Whisperer Joined: 10.22.2011
|
|
|
playoff experience and the right pick when we pick is a better option, this team is believing in EP and we have to take the steps to build around that asap - onesmallleap
|
|
onesmallleap
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Be Calm n Swede On, BC Joined: 09.23.2015
|
|
|
- bloatedmosquito
u should have dug deep and pulled out a deerhunter meme , |
|
|
|
Sorry I have to work in between my hockey debates lol. I think through 50 games we know what the team is, yes they are better than we thought, Pettersson and Markstrom changed things. However, they're still only ~ a .500 hockey club because they're not exactly very deep at this point.
Yesterday I posted through 50 games last year they were 20-24-6 for 46 points, this year they are better at 23-21-6 for 52 points, they are a mere three wins better than last year even though it feels like they are so much better.
The organization is not in a position to be trading ANY draft picks to reach, they're not, small moves like the Leivo trade, ok, those are good. - LeftCoaster
I still think that the team finishes 10 th from the bottom and I have no interest in being a buyer , but I am definitely interested in trades to improve as long as it is for a young player that will be here for years.
That said I think it is ludicrous to hear fans say we need to tank when a GM has 18 months left on his less than impressive tenure one point out of a playoff spot to tank to take a high draft pick they know very little about.
A more realistic finish with the tank with the is 5,6,7 th . So who do you like at that ranking spot and what part of their game most impresses you about them that you want the team to do a full about face?
|
|
onesmallleap
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Be Calm n Swede On, BC Joined: 09.23.2015
|
|
|
I still think that the team finishes 10 th from the bottom and I have no interest in being a buyer , but I am definitely interested in trades to improve as long as it is for a young player that will be here for years.
That said I think it is ludicrous to hear fans say we need to tank when a GM has 18 months left on his less than impressive tenure one point out of a playoff spot to tank to take a high draft pick they know very little about.
A more realistic finish with the tank with the is 5,6,7 th . So who do you like at that ranking spot and what part of their game most impresses you about them that you want the team to do a full about face? - VANTEL
i would like Byram , it more of a hunch then anything else , but that would be right where he'd be probably |
|
|
|
LeftCoaster
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Island City, BC Joined: 07.03.2009
|
|
|
draft picks are unknown comodities, that said they are the lifeblood of a team to a point , but we have so many pieces that can be traded and used to change the room so to speak, Goldy, Gradlund ,Bearschi, Schaller, Motte , JV, almost anyone not named EP or Boeser. Even Bo should be an option if the right offer came up.
before the freakout , if columbus offered Werenski for BO ala johannson for Meyers you have to look at that and make a hard choice - onesmallleap
What are you expecting for a return for middling guys like Goldy, Grandlund, Baertschi, Schaller, Motte, etc.? That equates to shuffling the chairs on the deck of the Titanic. You're not going to get over the hump by doing that and magically turn this team into a contenders, stop fooling yourself.
If they traded Sutter and Tanev for a player, that might get you something, but it in-turn makes the defense worse. Gudbranson is poop, lets be honest, he's not bringing you a great return. Edler doesn't want to go. So I don't see any moves of significance helping Petey, Horvat and Boeser.
Patience for the rest of this year is the way to go IMO. Do the mid Feb Benning tank, trade Sutter for a 2nd rounder, bring up Gaudette, let Demko get the majority of the games and see where the chips fall. |
|
|
|
i would like Byram , it more of a hunch then anything else , but that would be right where he'd be probably - onesmallleap
Lets assume Hughes Cozens Byram Kakko and Podzkolzin are gone in first 5 and you end up 7 like last year who then?
|
|