1970vintage
Seattle Kraken |
|
|
Location: BC Joined: 11.11.2010
|
|
|
This year he has? I completely disagree, as the majority of those players you've mentioned were not signed this year and those that were are bottom 6 players. - neem55
So signing bottom 6 players isn't signing UFA's? Were they RFA's? Have they been name checked as guys who were going to help the team win? Who were going to provide something special - "they're fast", "tough to play against", "will play the tough minutes". |
|
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Location: Canuckville, BC Joined: 01.09.2015
|
|
|
I'm not saying one way is better than another, I've never met any of these kids. But different people develop under a variety of conditions. Some players will benefit more by playing 8 minutes per night against the best players in the world while others need 20 minutes per night against their age group peers.
Basically what I'm saying is "playing more" does not equal "better development" - 1970vintage
I believe different players develop at differing rates with differing needs. Itโs not one big lump of prospects that fall into one way of developing nor are they on the same course of how they get deployed etc. |
|
1970vintage
Seattle Kraken |
|
|
Location: BC Joined: 11.11.2010
|
|
|
Cool. What I'm saying is: I completely disagree. - neem55
Yeah, I know, you're wrong. |
|
|
|
Gagner, Del Zotto, Beagle, Schaller, Rousel, Neilsson, Vanek
Which "good replacements" are in Utica exactly?
Traded young players/picks for more experienced, NHL ready players.
Benning has basically done the exact opposite of everything you have said here. - 1970vintage
Or maybe Benning doesn't know how to do it. |
|
neem55
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Joined: 02.02.2012
|
|
|
So signing bottom 6 players isn't signing UFA's? Were they RFA's? Have they been name checked as guys who were going to help the team win? Who were going to provide something special - "they're fast", "tough to play against", "will play the tough minutes". - 1970vintage
No signing bottom 6 players was not an attempt to make this a winning team. It's obviously signing UFA's, but it's not trying to fix all of your problems so that you can make a push for the playoffs either. I'm glad they had a hot surprising start, EP, Bo,JV and BB are looking great, but if you think this roster was put together to make the playoffs, given that they have the same awful d and goaltending, than IMO you're wrong. |
|
neem55
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Joined: 02.02.2012
|
|
|
Yeah, I know, you're wrong. - 1970vintage
Good one. I'm so glad to have someone who understands the nuances of development and also how to back up their opinions with facts on this message board. You're an inspiration |
|
1970vintage
Seattle Kraken |
|
|
Location: BC Joined: 11.11.2010
|
|
|
No signing bottom 6 players was not an attempt to make this a winning team. It's obviously signing UFA's, but it's not trying to fix all of your problems so that you can make a push for the playoffs either. I'm glad they had a hot surprising start, EP, Bo,JV and BB are looking great, but if you think this roster was put together to make the playoffs, given that they have the same awful d and goaltending, than IMO you're wrong. - neem55
Lol, everything that Benning has said since he took over has been about being competitive, and making the playoffs. Why would you pay Jay freaking Beafle $12m if you didn't believe he would help you win games. Because they have cap space? |
|
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Location: Canuckville, BC Joined: 01.09.2015
|
|
|
No signing bottom 6 players was not an attempt to make this a winning team. It's obviously signing UFA's, but it's not trying to fix all of your problems so that you can make a push for the playoffs either. I'm glad they had a hot surprising start, EP, Bo,JV and BB are looking great, but if you think this roster was put together to make the playoffs, given that they have the same awful d and goaltending, than IMO you're wrong. - neem55
You should read Vintsys posts. Your imagination is out of control ๐๐ |
|
neem55
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Joined: 02.02.2012
|
|
|
Lol, everything that Benning has said since he took over has been about being competitive, and making the playoffs. Why would you pay Jay freaking Beafle $12m if you didn't believe he would help you win games. Because they have cap space? - 1970vintage
No, because not all of your players are ready for the rigours of the NHL and because it's important to have professionals in order to have kids learn how to be professionals. I'm not the biggest Beagle fan, but he is definitely a solid pro with a good work ethic IMO. |
|
1970vintage
Seattle Kraken |
|
|
Location: BC Joined: 11.11.2010
|
|
|
Good one. I'm so glad to have someone who understands the nuances of development and also how to back up their opinions with facts on this message board. You're an inspiration - neem55
Even Nighthawk understands that player development isn't linear. You want examples?
Mark Scheifele and Ryan Kesler. |
|
neem55
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Joined: 02.02.2012
|
|
|
You should read Vintsys posts. Your imagination is out of control ๐๐ - Nighthawk
Yes, because me responding to his posts directly is not an indication that I'm reading them. You're powers of observation are second to none. |
|
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Location: Canuckville, BC Joined: 01.09.2015
|
|
|
No, because not all of YOUR players are ready for the rigours of the NHL and because it's important to have professionals in order to have kids learn how to be professionals. I'm not the biggest Beagle fan, but he is definitely a solid pro with a good work ethic IMO. - neem55
Curious as to who YOUR team is? ๐ |
|
neem55
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Joined: 02.02.2012
|
|
|
Even Nighthawk understands that player development isn't linear. You want examples?
Mark Scheifele and Ryan Kesler. - 1970vintage
Different players need different things, that's why you have professionals deciding who needs what. I've never, at any point, said I think player development is linear. That's your own inference and it isn't based on any opinions I hold, rather your imagination. |
|
|
|
neem55
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Joined: 02.02.2012
|
|
|
Curious as to who YOUR team is? ๐ - Nighthawk
I'm curious as whether you think your comments are actually intelligible given your ability to articulate. |
|
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Location: Canuckville, BC Joined: 01.09.2015
|
|
|
Player development starts with the GM & is passed on down to Utica. Pros teach on & off ice habits by example. In the end coaches are responsible for every player whether prospect or pro to play within the system & to improve on everything they can. |
|
1970vintage
Seattle Kraken |
|
|
Location: BC Joined: 11.11.2010
|
|
|
Different players need different things, that's why you have professionals deciding who needs what. I've never, at any point, said I think player development is linear. That's your own inference and it isn't based on any opinions I hold, rather your imagination. - neem55
No, it's based entirely on your statement that playing more minutes in the AHL is 100% better for every player than playing fewer minutes in the NHL. |
|
neem55
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Joined: 02.02.2012
|
|
|
No, it's based entirely on your statement that playing more minutes in the AHL is 100% better for every player than playing fewer minutes in the NHL. - 1970vintage
As I said, not every player needs the same thing. That's why you have management and coaches to sort out who needs what. IMO playing more minutes and a more diverse set of in-game situations is better experience than riding the pine in the NHL, in general, but some young guys are good enough to play meaningful minutes at the NHL level and so it can be good experience to be in the show. Depends on the player, but generally more minutes, more opportunities is better than less. |
|
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Location: Canuckville, BC Joined: 01.09.2015
|
|
|
I'm curious as whether you think your comments are actually intelligible given your ability to articulate. - neem55
I suggest you ask a poster a question if uncertain. That is better than your poorly veiled & condescending attempt at claiming โcuriousโ. Intelligibe enough to your liking? |
|
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Location: Canuckville, BC Joined: 01.09.2015
|
|
|
Even Nighthawk understands that player development isn't linear. You want examples?
Mark Scheifele and Ryan Kesler. - 1970vintage
I have my moments donโt expect it often ๐ |
|
1970vintage
Seattle Kraken |
|
|
Location: BC Joined: 11.11.2010
|
|
|
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Location: Canuckville, BC Joined: 01.09.2015
|
|
|
People are always crazy, wins have nothing to do with it - 1970vintage
I agree & itโs all about the process. |
|
neem55
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Joined: 02.02.2012
|
|
|
I suggest you ask a poster a question if uncertain. That is better than your poorly veiled & condescending attempt at claiming โcuriousโ. Intelligibe enough to your liking? - Nighthawk
Arguably the most intelligible thing you've written, there was no veiling I was pretty directly saying you spurt incoherent posts in response to you attempting to insult me with, you guessed it, an incoherent comment. |
|
|
|
Cory
โ
@CoryHergott
8m8 minutes ago
More
A healthy scratch for Boucher is interesting especially when it comes to the teamโs leading scorer. Has he been called up? Has he been traded? Is it just his turn to sit? Is the coach sending him a message? |
|
|
|
MacEwen and Dahlen with goals 2-2 |
|