Wanna blog? Start your own hockey blog with My HockeyBuzz. Register for free today!
 
Forums :: Blog World :: Carol Schram: Vancouver Canucks waive Sam Gagner & Darren Archibald to set their roster
Author Message
thundachunk
Location: Help
Joined: 12.31.2011

Oct 1 @ 5:04 PM ET
no canucks fan is arguing that waiving him was a mistake. we're arguing whether signing him (at all) was a small mistake or a total non-issue.

what does that tell you about gagner?

- RealityChecker

I’m going with small mistake but for me it’s a non issue. The issue for me is good because Benning did the right thing.

I am actually looking forward to the season. Win or lose this team will be exciting again soon.
A_SteamingLombardi
Location: Systemic failure / Slurptastic
Joined: 10.12.2008

Oct 1 @ 5:09 PM ET
Do you think Gagne can still score 8 points a night in the AHL?
kaptaan
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: Turning a new Leaf, CA
Joined: 09.29.2010

Oct 1 @ 5:14 PM ET
It's worse if Benning held onto Gagner just cuz he didn't want to look bad.

I like Benning more now that he moved on from a guy not living up to his deal.
Codes1087
Vancouver Canucks
Joined: 09.24.2014

Oct 1 @ 5:15 PM ET
It's worse if Benning held onto Gagner just cuz he didn't want to look bad.

I like Benning more now that he moved on from a guy not living up to his deal.

- kaptaan


no one is criticizing benning for waiving gagner. I don't think one person has voiced displeasure in this move.
manvanfan
Vancouver Canucks
Location: MB
Joined: 01.21.2012

Oct 1 @ 5:15 PM ET
Should we grab chaput off waivers just in case?!
- canucksfan1944

I was hoping for Connor Carrick but nope.


SlightlyOffside
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Ajax, ON
Joined: 01.25.2016

Oct 1 @ 5:17 PM ET
Carol,

Thank you for yet another excellent blog post & congrats on the national coverage on the Kelowna game summary!

Last in Division
Last in Conference
29th overall
Picking 2nd (though I’d love the storyline of first overall pick as host)

Marwood
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Cumberland, BC
Joined: 03.18.2010

Oct 1 @ 5:17 PM ET
I was hoping for Connor Carrick but nope.
- manvanfan

That would have been a real difference maker.
neem55
Vancouver Canucks
Joined: 02.02.2012

Oct 1 @ 5:19 PM ET
Lines for the #Canucks in practice this AM:

Baertschi-Horvat-Boeser
Goldobin-Pettersson-Eriksson
Motte-Sutter-Virtanen
Schaller-Beagle-Leipsic/Granlund

Edler-Tanev
Del Zotto-Stecher
Pouliot-Gudbranson
Hutton-Biega

Per BB

- Codes1087


Nice. This is as good of a lineup as we could hope for IMO.
neem55
Vancouver Canucks
Joined: 02.02.2012

Oct 1 @ 5:20 PM ET
Carol,

Thank you for yet another excellent blog post & congrats on the national coverage on the Kelowna game summary!

Last in Division
Last in Conference
29th overall
Picking 2nd (though I’d love the storyline of first overall pick as host)

- SlightlyOffside

Top3 will be good enough!
manvanfan
Vancouver Canucks
Location: MB
Joined: 01.21.2012

Oct 1 @ 5:20 PM ET
Nice. This is as good of a lineup as we could hope for IMO.
- neem55

I would have waived Hutton or Biega over Gagner.
VANTEL
Joined: 07.03.2010

Oct 1 @ 5:20 PM ET
no one is criticizing benning for waiving gagner. I don't think one person has voiced displeasure in this move.
- Codes1087



If Pettersson was not ready this year would Gagner still be a Canuck ? Probably .

So why is signing or waiving a stop gap a huge issue ? When Gaudette is ready Sutter will probably be moved. When Hughes is ready MDZ will be moved.
Codes1087
Vancouver Canucks
Joined: 09.24.2014

Oct 1 @ 5:22 PM ET
Nice. This is as good of a lineup as we could hope for IMO.
- neem55


I agree. I think the top 6 is as good as its going to get. I imagine Rousel slots in the 3rd line and replaces Motte and Motte can hopefully slide to the 4th and Granlund/Schaller sit.
thundachunk
Location: Help
Joined: 12.31.2011

Oct 1 @ 5:25 PM ET
I agree. I think the top 6 is as good as its going to get. I imagine Rousel slots in the 3rd line and replaces Motte and Motte can hopefully slide to the 4th and Granlund/Schaller sit.
- Codes1087

Schaller and Granlund really showed nothing at camp either. It could have just as easily been one of them except neither is making 3 million either.
Marwood
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Cumberland, BC
Joined: 03.18.2010

Oct 1 @ 5:27 PM ET
If Pettersson was not ready this year would Gagner still be a Canuck ? Probably .

So why is signing or waiving a stop gap a huge issue ? When Gaudette is ready Sutter will probably be moved. When Hughes is ready MDZ will be moved.

- VANTEL

To me the issue is pro scouting. Gagner was slow and defensively inept. There must of been better options in that years free agency for a stop gap centre. The UFA signings have been brutal for the most part. Year after year. I understand their strategy, their execution is amateurish and poorly informed.
canucksfan1944
Joined: 12.13.2016

Oct 1 @ 5:28 PM ET
Schaller and Granlund really showed nothing at camp either. It could have just as easily been one of them except neither is making 3 million either.
- thundachunk


True, I think the message to the team is much louder by making it SG though. Almost nobody is safe if they under perform/think they are owed anything.
Codes1087
Vancouver Canucks
Joined: 09.24.2014

Oct 1 @ 5:29 PM ET
If Pettersson was not ready this year would Gagner still be a Canuck ? Probably .

So why is signing or waiving a stop gap a huge issue ? When Gaudette is ready Sutter will probably be moved. When Hughes is ready MDZ will be moved.

- VANTEL


I am not going to open up this can of warms again man. It was covered in the last few pages of the last blog and the first two pages of this blog. No one is saying it was a mistake to waive Gagner, and Gagner's signing itself was never questions, he was brought in to fill a need, on the PP, and it worked. We are all in agreeance on todays move lol.
To your point about Gagner being waived because of Pettersson. I think Gagner was waived because of Motte. Pettersson beats out nearly every player on the team for a roster spot, let alone roster bubble players.
thundachunk
Location: Help
Joined: 12.31.2011

Oct 1 @ 5:30 PM ET
I would have waived Hutton or Biega over Gagner.
- manvanfan

Could still waive them both. One is going to be waived soon enough once Juolevi makes a good showing in Utica.
A_SteamingLombardi
Location: Systemic failure / Slurptastic
Joined: 10.12.2008

Oct 1 @ 5:30 PM ET
To me the issue is pro scouting. Gagner was slow and defensively inept. There must of been better options in that years free agency for a stop gap centre. The UFA signings have been brutal for the most part. Year after year. I understand their strategy, their execution is amateurish and poorly informed.
- Marwood

Yup, that's why I'm worried about this years UFAs, at least their contracts.
A_SteamingLombardi
Location: Systemic failure / Slurptastic
Joined: 10.12.2008

Oct 1 @ 5:32 PM ET
I would have waived Hutton or Biega over Gagner.
- manvanfan

They will all have to be waived if no one is willing to trade for them.
canucksfan1944
Joined: 12.13.2016

Oct 1 @ 5:33 PM ET
Yup, that's why I'm worried about this years UFAs, at least their contracts.
- A_SteamingLombardi


We can just waive them! Joking aside, I think AR and beagle were needed. No floating around / soft play like SG or granlund. Shaller I don't think they sign if they know Motte was going to play so well.
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Canuckville, BC
Joined: 01.09.2015

Oct 1 @ 5:33 PM ET
On Gagner he didn’t produce & I thought he should be waived & help Utica. His D isn’t good enough to get by & earn a spot.
Goldobin is better to run with in his place.
Archie is simply not consistent enough to be bottom 3 but he’s likeable. Possible call up.
Glad to see Motte make the team & hope he can give it 82 games of energy.

In the end i see JB & TG will do what it takes in waiving Gagner. Appears they see Goldy has improved & rewarded Motte.
VANTEL
Joined: 07.03.2010

Oct 1 @ 5:33 PM ET
To me the issue is pro scouting. Gagner was slow and defensively inept. There must of been better options in that years free agency for a stop gap centre. The UFA signings have been brutal for the most part. Year after year. I understand their strategy, their execution is amateurish and poorly informed.
- Marwood


You are bang on with the pro scouting . It bites . Canucks have many other issues also . They have had them for years.

It blows my mind how a guy like Bonino has a good year with Ana comes here and turns into a black hole and leaves and finds his game immediately.

Canucks have a lot of problems and I think Benning is in way over his head but I don't gave an issue with a prospect outplaying a stop gap and making the team.
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Canuckville, BC
Joined: 01.09.2015

Oct 1 @ 5:36 PM ET
To wrap up today—how concerned are you about the Canucks' 1-6-0 record in preseason?

I am not concerned at all, in fact I think you could extrapolate those figures to mirror the upcoming season.

"Where do you think the *Canucks* will finish in the division, the conference and the league?"

I think they finish last in their division, last in their conference and 3rd last in the league.

- Makita


That could very well all come true.
Nucker101
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Vancouver, BC
Joined: 09.26.2010

Oct 1 @ 5:36 PM ET
I would have waived Hutton or Biega over Gagner.
- manvanfan


I'd waive Pouliot before Hutton right now


Also Schaller and Granlund if we're going off of pre-season.
VANTEL
Joined: 07.03.2010

Oct 1 @ 5:36 PM ET
I am not going to open up this can of warms again man. It was covered in the last few pages of the last blog and the first two pages of this blog. No one is saying it was a mistake to waive Gagner, and Gagner's signing itself was never questions, he was brought in to fill a need, on the PP, and it worked. We are all in agreeance on todays move lol.
To your point about Gagner being waived because of Pettersson. I think Gagner was waived because of Motte. Pettersson beats out nearly every player on the team for a roster spot, let alone roster bubble players.

- Codes1087


Well then we are all in agreement . Next big balls move is Eriksson and that one will take talent to fix. Eriksson is the entire reason I am glad we didn't try to fix the scoring.
Page: Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22  Next