Location: Pretentious Beer Snob, ON Joined: 06.22.2015
Sep 30 @ 8:12 PM ET
I was talking about the obvious decisions and considerations of the Leafs. You obviously missed my post of not giving a twat about the back up but went ahead and told me a fictional story of the emphasis i didnt put on something.
It's not about how awesome McBackup is. It's the lack of confidence in the other guys. At the end of the day if Anderson goes down were (frank)ed whether it's sparks Pickard or McBackup filling in. - systemtool
Obviously you weren't so obvious but thanks for clarifying that everything I wrote was some sort of "fiction". Meanwhile, you continue to post about something you don't give a "twat" about -- a bull(poop) claim I didn't take too seriously because you made such a big show about not caring about the backup situation in the first place.
Again, because you "obviously" care so much about the Leafs backup situation, I present the case once again: if McBackup doesn't present a significant upgrade to Sparks and/or Pickard, than why keep him? He's 35 and not getting any younger. Sparks and Pickard have some potential and it would be terrible asset management to expose either of them to waivers. If we're (frank)ed if Freddie goes down than why not give one of the young ones a shot rather than holding onto a mediocre vet?
But please, tell me again how much you don't care.
Obviously you weren't so obvious but thanks for clarifying that everything I wrote was some sort of "fiction". Meanwhile, you continue to post about something you don't give a "twat" about -- a bull(poop) claim I didn't take too seriously because you made such a big show about not caring about the backup situation in the first place.
Again, because you "obviously" care so much about the Leafs backup situation, I present the case once again: if McBackup doesn't present a significant upgrade to Sparks and/or Pickard, than why keep him? He's 35 and not getting any younger. Sparks and Pickard have some potential and it would be terrible asset management to expose either of them to waivers. If we're (frank)ed if Freddie goes down than why not give one of the young ones a shot rather than holding onto a mediocre vet?
But please, tell me again how much you don't care. - mjones242
Location: David Clarkson's Water Bottle, ON Joined: 02.12.2013
Sep 30 @ 8:36 PM ET
[quote=21peter]FIGHT
As I continued on, the second hit is Dotchin on Matthews - not a single Leaf approaches Dotchin after the knee, ffs. Then Big Buff takes out 3...lol...what a beast.
Location: Henry Hudson's Fairchild 24 South Porcupine Joined: 04.03.2016
Sep 30 @ 8:51 PM ET
[quote=21peter]FIGHT As I continued on, the second hit is Dotchin on Matthews - not a single Leaf approaches Dotchin after the knee, ffs. Then Big Buff takes out 3...lol...what a beast. - Woderwick
Dotchin - (should be do-"double chin") - got waived and his contract cancelled for being a fatso. Apparently 30-35 lbs and 25% body fat. Maybe the Bolts can convince Callahan to take the same diet plan. (frank) him, dirty piece of poop, and (frank) Tampa.
Location: David Clarkson's Water Bottle, ON Joined: 02.12.2013
Sep 30 @ 9:06 PM ET
Do you think there is some form of gentleman's agreement regarding waiver pick ups this time of year? As in...please don't, or at least call first and lets talk about it?
Do you think there is some form of gentleman's agreement regarding waiver pick ups this time of year? As in...please don't, or at least call first and lets talk about it? - Woderwick
