|
|
The flames pick I get, but Edmonton is the same team, still without Sekera - jcragcrumple
Yeah, well they also signed Upshall and Garrison to PTO’s.
|
|
Glak18
Philadelphia Flyers |
|
|
Location: "It's pretty big loogie on my face, so I was pretty psssted".", PA Joined: 06.26.2007
|
|
|
Toughest division in hockey? Seriously now I know for fact he makes up things to fit into a blog. Pacific would be the weakest, possibly better than the Atlantic division. |
|
Conquest
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Joined: 08.06.2010
|
|
|
The Pacific division is not the toughest division in hockey, that's for sure. And Edmonton isn't winning that division regardless of McDavid... that D |
|
bchiaro
Pittsburgh Penguins |
|
Location: Tampa, FL Joined: 09.20.2008
|
|
|
Based on the grammar, and what he just said he thinks will happen, I am 99% certain Tanner is completely drunk or high right now. |
|
James Tanner
Washington Capitals |
|
Location: North Cederbrooke , ON Joined: 01.19.2017
|
|
|
If i had to pick 3 teams I would say Ducks, Flames and Sharks makes it one way or another. The rest is a crapshoot. - Cloud
Those three teams are just as much of a crapshoot as picking any other three of the teams. |
|
James Tanner
Washington Capitals |
|
Location: North Cederbrooke , ON Joined: 01.19.2017
|
|
|
Toughest division in hockey? Seriously now I know for fact he makes up things to fit into a blog. Pacific would be the weakest, possibly better than the Atlantic division. - Glak18
That's insane. Other divisions have better teams, but the Pacific has seven more or less equal teams, all of which are playoff threats. I guess if you massively underrate PHX EDM and CGY |
|
James Tanner
Washington Capitals |
|
Location: North Cederbrooke , ON Joined: 01.19.2017
|
|
|
Based on the grammar, and what he just said he thinks will happen, I am 99% certain Tanner is completely drunk or high right now. - bchiaro
I turned parity into a verb. That's not bad grammar, it's genius. I make words up pretty much every day. I am definitely not drunk though. |
|
|
|
Last years goal differential by division
Central: +100
Metropolitan: -5
Atlantic: -42
Pacific: -53
|
|
Glak18
Philadelphia Flyers |
|
|
Location: "It's pretty big loogie on my face, so I was pretty psssted".", PA Joined: 06.26.2007
|
|
|
That's insane. Other divisions have better teams, but the Pacific has seven more or less equal teams, all of which are playoff threats. I guess if you massively underrate PHX EDM and CGY - james_tanner1
Phoenix, Vancouver and Edmonton are bottom NHL teams, only division with more is the Atlantic with Ottawa, Montreal, Detroit and Buffalo. |
|
James Tanner
Washington Capitals |
|
Location: North Cederbrooke , ON Joined: 01.19.2017
|
|
|
Phoenix, Vancouver and Edmonton are bottom NHL teams, only division with more is the Atlantic with Ottawa, Montreal, Detroit and Buffalo. - Glak18
No, they were but they aren't now. Classic mistake - everyone assumes last year's standings will repeat, they forget that the NHL is crazy random and that other the top and bottom few teams, most teams are the same. |
|
Glak18
Philadelphia Flyers |
|
|
Location: "It's pretty big loogie on my face, so I was pretty psssted".", PA Joined: 06.26.2007
|
|
|
No, they were but they aren't now. Classic mistake - everyone assumes last year's standings will repeat, they forget that the NHL is crazy random and that other the top and bottom few teams, most teams are the same. - james_tanner1
Speaking of classic mistakes, thinking a team with the best player automatically makes them one of the top teams. This isn't the NBA.
Thinking teams will magically transform in 1 offseason barely happens. Yes, some teams have bad seasons due to injury to key players or multiple other reasons, but these teams are not good no matter how much you wish them to be. There is no evidence to support other than guessing.
|
|
Newgod77
Boston Bruins |
|
Location: IL Joined: 05.10.2015
|
|
|
xShoot4WarAmpsx
Philadelphia Flyers |
|
|
Location: Hamilton, ON Joined: 06.25.2010
|
|
|
The flames pick I get, but Edmonton is the same team, still without Sekera - jcragcrumple
Exactly, they were the same team last year as the team the previous year that made the playoffs too. Edmonton isnt as bad as they played last season. Talbot had a rough year. He only started to play like himself after it was too late |
|
James Tanner
Washington Capitals |
|
Location: North Cederbrooke , ON Joined: 01.19.2017
|
|
|
Speaking of classic mistakes, thinking a team with the best player automatically makes them one of the top teams. This isn't the NBA.
Thinking teams will magically transform in 1 offseason barely happens. Yes, some teams have bad seasons due to injury to key players or multiple other reasons, but these teams are not good no matter how much you wish them to be. There is no evidence to support other than guessing.
- Glak18
Oilers were 14th in CF%
5th in shots for
3rd in scoring chances
23rd in save percentage
and 22nd in PDO.
They are a perfectly fine team who's core players are still getting better. No one thinks they will magically transform, but they are closer to being the team everyone predicted at the start of last season than they are to the team they ended up being last year.
|
|
James Tanner
Washington Capitals |
|
Location: North Cederbrooke , ON Joined: 01.19.2017
|
|
|
Proof read - Newgod77
Go for it. |
|
bulet13
Philadelphia Flyers |
|
Location: Faceoffs, Plus/Minus, and PIMs...the Holy Trinity, TX Joined: 03.10.2013
|
|
|
The Met has the last 3 cup winners and both the Met and Central sent 5 teams to the playoffs... But the Pacific is the best, when last year it was arguably the easiest? Yeah... No... |
|
LAkings96
Los Angeles Kings |
|
Location: La Verne, CA Joined: 12.15.2012
|
|
|
The Met has the last 3 cup winners and both the Met and Central sent 5 teams to the playoffs... But the Pacific is the best, when last year it was arguably the easiest? Yeah... No... - bulet13
Who was the 5th Central team in the playoffs? Knights, Ducks, Sharks and Kings all made the playoffs last year. And just FYI the cup challengers the last 2 out of three years were Pacific Division teams. I’m not saying it’s the best, but the Pacific Division is not weak by any means. |
|
jimi james
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: Somewhere Between, NB Joined: 07.17.2010
|
|
|
dozerD10
Anaheim Ducks |
|
Location: long beach, CA Joined: 01.29.2014
|
|
|
That's what Dreams are made of
- jimi james
Not only a great album ... it’s also my favorite song with Sammy - |
|
jimi james
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: Somewhere Between, NB Joined: 07.17.2010
|
|
|
Not only a great album ... it’s also my favorite song with Sammy - - dozerD10
I remember when it came out...best song on the album for sure
Balance is my fav with Sammy
OU812 cranked really really loud is cool too...different, but very cool slick production
|
|
LeafGuy89
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
Location: ON Joined: 05.13.2017
|
|
|
Oh god Tanner... delusional or what.
1. Metro
2. Central
3. Pacific
4. Atlantic
And Atlantic will eventually pass the Pacific with all the high draft picks low ranked teams will be getting for the next few years. |
|
LeftCoaster
San Jose Sharks |
|
|
Location: Shark City, CA Joined: 07.03.2009
|
|
|
I think you're underestimating how good Minny, Colorado, St. Louis and Dallas are, they had 101, 95 , 94 & 92 point respectively. Yeah Minnesota seems they can never get over the hump but Colorado should be slightly better and St. Louis should be a lot better. Dallas had 42 wins last year, still a one line team but neither terrible or really good.
SJ
LA
Vegas
Anaheim
Calgary
Edmonton
Arizona
Vancouver |
|
corduroy
Philadelphia Flyers |
|
Location: “How many times is she gonna ask this f'n question?”, NT Joined: 12.09.2006
|
|
|
leonkennedy
Chicago Blackhawks |
|
|
Location: 3 cups in 5 years = DYNASTY Joined: 04.13.2012
|
|
|
sbroads24
Buffalo Sabres |
|
Location: We are in 30th place. It's 2017 , NY Joined: 02.12.2012
|
|
|
Oilers were 14th in CF%
5th in shots for
3rd in scoring chances
23rd in save percentage
and 22nd in PDO.
They are a perfectly fine team who's core players are still getting better. No one thinks they will magically transform, but they are closer to being the team everyone predicted at the start of last season than they are to the team they ended up being last year. - james_tanner1
No, they aren’t.
They are a bad team with a generational player, and a few other really good ones.
Their depth is awful, and they are basically the Sabres of last year with better star power |
|